Case law

Missouri Farmers Ass'n v. McBee

787 S.W.2d 756 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1990

Cork Plumbing Co. v. Martin Bloom Associates, 573 S.W.2d 947, 958 (Mo.App.1978). … In Samuelson v.

State v. Williams

545 S.W.2d 342 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1976

Defendant’s action would thereby not comport with the statutory definition of excusable homicide, as he was acting unlawfully. § 559.050 RSMo. 1969; State v. Browning, 442 S.W.2d 55 (Mo.banc 1969); State v. … State v. Brown, 502 S.W.2d 295 (Mo.1973) cert. den., 416 U.S. 973 , 94 S.Ct. 1999 , 40 L.Ed.2d 562 (1974); State v. Walker, 525 S.W.2d 826 (Mo.App.1975). See also MAI-Cr.

State v. Juralos

611 S.W.2d 569 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 1981

Two pairs of brown work gloves were found under the front passenger seat of the vehicle. Mere presence at the scene of the crime is insufficient, by itself, to support a conviction. State v. … State v. Simmons, 494 S.W.2d 302 (Mo.1973). To convict a defendant of burglary, it is not necessary that the state prove that he personally committed each act involved in the offense. State v.

LaRue v. Alcorn

389 S.W.3d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2012

While Sections 3 and 4 of Article V discuss removal and replacement of “[a]ny officer elected by the Board of Directors,” the removal or firing of employees or employee shareholders is not discussed. … . *220 Our Eastern District in Kenney v.

Tillis v. City of St. Louis

472 S.W.3d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2015

State ex rel. Niess v. Junkins

563 S.W.2d 173 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1978

We do not believe the appeal stands in the same premature posture as Peters v. Board of Education of Reorg. Sch. Dist. No. 5, 506 S.W.2d 429 (Mo.1974), cited by the appellants. … V, § 11 (as amended 1970); Winslow v. Sauerwein, 365 Mo. 269, 274 , 282 S.W.2d 14, 17 [4] (1955); Starr v. Mitchell, 231 S.W.2d 299, 301 [4] (Mo.App.1950).

Reber v. Tower

11 Mo. App. 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1881

Wilbur v. Johnson, 58 Mo. 600 ; St. Louis R. Co. v. Silver, 56 Mo. 265 ; King v. Mittalberger, 50 Mo. 182 ; Meyer v. Railroad Co., 43 Mo. 523 ; Smith v. Hutchings, 30 Mo. 380 ; The State v. Hughes, 24 Mo. 147 ; Walsh v. … ” and the plaintiff answered : “ No ; but two days afterward a fireman by the name of Brown showed me some.” And in answer to another question he stated that this was the same Brown who had been on the witness-stand.

Moore by and Through Moore v. Appleton City R-Ii School Dist.

232 S.W.3d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007

(“Board”) meeting. … Co. of America v. Graham, 984 S.W.2d 501, 506 (Mo. banc 1999).

Golden v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

84 Mo. App. 59 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1900

Bartlett v. Hooksett, 48 N. H. 18. In this case the place where the boards were piled was at the intersection of the highway and the defendant’s right of way. … Crocker v. McGregor, 76 Me. 282 ; House v. Metcalf, 27 Conn. 631 ; Gordon v. Railway, 58 N. H. 396; Hill v. Railway, 55 Me. 438 ; Darling v. Westmoreland, 52 N. H. 401.

State Ex Rel. Girard v. Percich

557 S.W.2d 25 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1977

McMullin v. Sulgrove, 459 S.W.2d 383 (Mo.banc 1970); State v. Koon, supra; State ex rel. Wendt v. Journey, supra. … in Curtis v.

Beeler v. Finnel

85 Mo. App. 438 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1900

That afterwards he aided in procuring board for the mother with a private family in said city. That he furnished the money to pay the woman’s board at these places. … Harrington v. Railway, 60 Mo. App. 223, 230 . The statute of limitations does not apply to a running account where there has been a payment within the period of time limited for bringing the action.

State v. Perry

35 S.W.3d 397 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2000

State v. Brown, 958 S.W.2d 574, 580 (Mo.App.W.D.1997); State v. Price, 684 S.W.2d 566, 568 (Mo. App.1984). … State v. Taylor, 944 S.W.2d 925, 936 (Mo. banc 1997). When instructional error arises, prejudice is judicially determined by considering the facts and instruction together. Brown, 958 S.W.2d at 581 .

Gibson v. Adams

946 S.W.2d 796 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1997

Gieselmann v. Stegeman, 443 S.W.2d 127 (Mo.1969). Adams and Murphy increased their salaries while decreasing Gibson’s, an action done without board or shareholder approval. … Haugland v. Parsons, 863 S.W.2d 609, 610 (Mo.App. E.D.1992). Tortious interference with a contract is one such independent tort. Hanrahan v. Nashua Corp., 752 S.W.2d 878 (Mo.App.1988); Honigmann v.

Johnson v. Watkins

298 S.W.2d 535 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1957

The appellant was the sole owner of the Brown Owl Tavern in St. Joseph, and for a number of years had had a license to sell liquor. … Rush v. Swift & Co., Mo.App., 268 S.W.2d 589, 593-594 .

Norton v. Smith

782 S.W.2d 775 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1989

Twiehaus v. Adolf, 706 S.W.2d 443, 445 (Mo. banc 1986). … Barthelette v. Sanders, 756 S.W.2d 536, 538 (Mo. banc 1988).

Reynolds Ex Rel. Reynolds v. National Casualty Co.

231 Mo. App. 453 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1937

[Schmohl v. Travelers’ Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 189 S. W. 597 , affirmed (Mo. Sup.), 197 S. W. 60 ; State ex rel. v. Ellison, 266 Mo. 580 .] In Stewart v. North American Acc. Ins. Co., 33 S. … In the above case the insured was riding upon the running board.

State v. Ryun

784 S.W.2d 636 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1990

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). The question presented is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the state, is sufficient to support the verdict. Id. … State v. Brown, 749 S.W.2d 448, 449 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Masslon, 746 S.W.2d 618 (Mo.App.1988). The evidence establishes a prima fa-cie case and is sufficient for submission to the jury on the issue of Mr.

City of Craig v. Smith

31 Mo. App. 286 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1888

And it is provided by section 4956, Revised Statutes, that: “When the board of aldermen shall fix the rate of taxation, the clerk of the board shall charge the collector with the full amount of such taxes levied and to be … This view is sustained by the Supreme Court in analogous cases: State ex rel. v. Spencer, 49 Mo. 342 ; State ex rel. v. Maguire, 52 Mo. 420 .

Albers v. Merchants' Exchange of St. Louis

140 Mo. App. 446 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1909

[Morton v. Supreme Council, 100 Mo. App. 76 .] … [Lewine v. Sup. Lodge, 122 Mo. App. 547 , 99 S. W. 821 ; Casey v. Transit Co., 116 Mo. App. 235 , 91 S. W. 419 ; s. c. 205 Mo. 721 .]

State ex rel. Fisher v. Fisher

433 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

Kugler v. … In Adler v.