Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

2.30s

  • Dean v. Wissmann

    996 S.W.2d 631 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1999

    Relying on Walter v. … Board of Regents of Southwest Missouri State University, v. Harriman, 792 S.W.2d 388, 391 (Mo.App.1990).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Emergency Patient Services, Inc. v. Crisp

    602 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1980

    Hedden Co. v. Dozier, 133 A. 857, 859 (N.J.Eq.1926); Schmidt v. Paul, 105 A.2d 118, 121 (Pa. 1954); and 18 C.J.S. Corporations § 19, p. 612. … See Ramacciotti v. Joe Simpkins, Inc., 427 S.W.2d 425, 431 (Mo.1968). As stated in Jorndt v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • French v. School Dist. No. 20 of Scott Co.

    223 Mo. App. 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1928

    The May provides that the board of education of defendant school district shall select a depository for its funds. [Sec. 11268, R. S. 1919.] But no selection of a de *54 pository was made by the board. … [Ahl v. Rhoads, 84 Pa. 319 ; Cameron v. Christy, 133 Atl. (Pa.) 551; City of Williston v. Ludowese, 208 N. W. (S. D.) 82; Richards v. Oseola Bank, 45 N. W. (Iowa) 294; Ward v. Johnson, 95 Ill. 215 ; McFerson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kutz v. Cargill, Inc.

    793 S.W.2d 622 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1990

    Johnson v. Johnson, 764 S.W.2d 711, 713 (Mo.App.1989). … Co. v. Koenigsmark, 717 S.W.2d 271, 273 (Mo.App.1986).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Gay v. Mutual Union Telegraph Co.

    12 Mo. App. 485 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1882

    The ordinance says, the board of public improvements. That discretion has been committed to them, and we have no power to revise it, unless possibly in case of manifest abuse. The Commonwealth v. … Codding, 2 Bing. 226; Iveson v. Moore, 1 Ld. Raym. 486; s. c. Willes, 74, note a), or renders it more tedious (Blagrave v. Bristol Waterworks Co., 1 Hurl. & N. 367; s. c. 26 L. J. (Exch.) 57; Wiggins v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fields v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

    169 Mo. App. 624 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1913

    [Quinn v. Railway, 218 Mo. l. c. 554; Hays v. Railway, 51 Mo. App. l. c. 445.] … Rep. 489 , and of the Supreme Court in Stid v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ragsdale v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

    229 Mo. App. 545 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1934

    , which refused said elaim and gave due notice of such refusal to plaintiff, and that the action of the beneficiary board would be reported to the Insurance Board and this last named Board would meet on the second Monday … board as provided by said constitution and that said board disapproved said elaim, and the same was referred to the board of insurance which also disapproved the same, and therefore he is not entitled to any benefits under

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. City of Louisiana

    734 S.W.2d 890 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1987

    Great Lakes Pipe Line Company v. … Section 89.110 was enacted to address challenges to actions of boards of adjustment or any other entities taking action with respect to applying a valid ordinance. See, State ex rel. Croy v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Richardson

    810 S.W.2d 544 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1991

    Donohoe, supra; State v. Brown, 762 S.W.2d 471, 474 (Mo.App.1988). … Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). That belief must rest on the particular facts and circumstances of the situation, State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • FIRST MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH v. Rollins

    151 S.W.3d 846 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 2004

    151 S.W.3d 846 (2004) FIRST MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALLWIN, a/k/a First Baptist Church of Ballwin, by and through its Board of Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. … Wall USA, Inc. v. City of Ballwin, 53 S.W.3d 168, 172 (Mo.App. E.D.2001).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eyermann v. Scollay

    16 Mo. App. 498 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1885

    In Eyermann v. … Louis v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Schmitt v. St. Louis Transit Co.

    115 Mo. App. 445 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1905

    recovery for an injury caused by acceleration of speed while the party was in the act of boarding it. … [Hansberger v. Railroad, 82 Mo. App. 566, 579 , and citations.] If the car is moving very slowly, it is a question for the jury whether the act was negligent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McAninch v. Robinson

    942 S.W.2d 452 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1997

    Miller v. Ernst & Young, 892 S.W.2d at 389 . … Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d at 381.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • West Central Missouri Region Lodge 50 of The Fraternal Order of Police v. The city of Grandview, Missouri

    460 S.W.3d 425 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2015

    See City of Columbia Missouri v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 605 S.W.2d 192, 194 (Mo. App. 1980); Golden Valley Memorial Hospital District v. … Federation of Teachers v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lodderhose v. City of Ferguson

    837 S.W.2d 361 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1992

    Appellant (Policeman) appeals an order of the circuit court affirming a decision of the Personnel Board of the City of Ferguson (Board). … Crow v. West Side St. Ry. Co., 146 Mo. 155 , 47 S.W. 959, 961 (1898); accord State ex rel. Adams v. Corrigan, 538 S.W.2d 372, 373 (Mo.App.1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ebert v. A. J. Kasper Co.

    228 Mo. App. 589 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1934

    *Page 593 [Martin v. Kline Apparel Co., 249 S.W. 965 ; Birdsong v. Jones, 30 S.W.2d 1094 .] Moreover, one of the defenses was that a toe board was maintained in each floor. … [Bachman v. Q.O. K.C.R.R. Co., 274 S.W. 764 , 767.]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. School District No. 15, Pleasant Valley, Jackson County v. Conley

    470 S.W.2d 170 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1971

    School District v. Byers, 67 Mo. 706 , determined that in such a situation mandamus would issue to compel the county clerk to extend the school tax levy on the county tax book. … Consolidated School District C-4 of Caldwell County v. Blackwell, Mo.App., 254 S.W.2d 243 , this court issued its writ for such purpose.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hayden v. First Community State Bank of Savannah

    575 S.W.2d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1978

    In Leggett v. … The rule is well stated in Upshaw v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kenney v. Emge

    972 S.W.2d 616 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1998

    Rallo Contracting Co. v. Blong, 313 S.W.2d 734, 738 (Mo.App. E.D.1958); Smith v. Bennett, 472 S.W.2d 623, 627 (Mo.App. S.D.1971). … Hamilton v. Hecht, 299 S.W.2d 577, 579 (Mo.App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sandretto v. Q., O. K.C.R.R. Co.

    218 Mo. App. 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1924

    [State ex rel. v. Little River Drainage District, 271 Mo. 429 ; Monroe v. Chicago, etc., R. Co., 219 S.W. 68 , 69.] … In Breen v. Johnson Bros.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.