Case law

Wilson v. Riddler

92 Mo. App. 335 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1902

v. … But it contained or suggested enough to put a prudent man on inquiry, and thereby, under the case of Brown v. Hoffelmeyer, was competent evidence on the question of actual notice.

Pac-One, Inc. v. Daly

37 S.W.3d 278 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 2000

Workers v. Pendergast, 891 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo. banc 1995). Initially, taxpayers must appeal Collector's assessment of their property to the Board pursuant to section 138.180. See Nexus Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. … Indus., Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n, 797 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1990), in support of its contention that an appeal before the Board subject to an appeal to the Commission satisfies section 139.031.3.

Wright v. Interco, Inc.

567 S.W.2d 149 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1978

A mechanical engineer testified that a person’s foot would be more likely to slip off a beveled edged board than a square board. … Ward v. Temple Stephens Company, supra, 418 S.W.2d 935, 938-39 [5-6] (Mo.1967). Pagano v. Kolbrener, Inc., 469 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 [3] (Mo.App.1971); Richardson v.

State v. Abbott

547 S.W.2d 853 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1977

In State v. Brown, 502 S.W.2d 295, 299 [3, 4] (Mo.1973), the trial court failed to meet the requirements of Section 546.230 by simply stating at each recess that the jury was to “keep in mind” its previous admonition. … For the same reasons excusing literal compliance with § 546.230 in State v. Brown, supra, we find the error harmless in this case.” (Emphasis supplied) A very recent case of State v.

Pessin v. State Tax Commission

875 S.W.2d 143 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1994

Louis County, Missouri with reference to the Questover v. … Gullic v. City of Fredericktown, 679 S.W.2d 436, 437 (Mo.App.1984). Plaintiffs abandoned Count IV which sought review of the Tax Commission ruling in Questover v. Morton where they were not parties.

CARTER CTY. SCH. DIST. v. Palmer

582 S.W.2d 347 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1979

Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. Louis, 500 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.App.1973); Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools, Mt. Vernon v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779 (Mo. banc 1976). … Board of Ed. of Francis Howell Sch. Dist., St. Charles, 575 S.W.2d 827 (Mo.App.1978); Pollard v. Board of Ed. Reorg. Sch. Dist. No.

State v. Ferrell

317 S.W.3d 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2010

See also State v. Mahurin, 207 S.W.3d 662, 662-68 (Mo.App.2006); State v. Carrillo, 935 S.W.2d 328 , 329 & n. 1 (Mo.App.1996). … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 619 (Mo. banc 2006) and State ex rel. Dane v. State, 115 S.W.3d 876, 879 (Mo.App.2003).

Galbreath v. Newton

30 Mo. App. 380 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1887

Moran v. Lindell, 52 Mo. 229 ; Carlin v. Cavender, 56 Mo. 288 . In State v. … People v. Board, 43 N. Y. 227 . The advertisement for bidders for this work was under the terms of *394 the ordinance, while the contract, as actually let, was as has been shown.

Tuckness v. Adams

403 S.W.3d 597 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2011

Patterson v. Warten, Fisher, Lee & Brown, L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 417, 419 (Mo. App.2008); Thiel v. Miller, 164 S.W.3d 76, 82 (Mo.App.2005); Steward v. … Rea v. Moore, 74 S.W.3d 795, 799 (Mo.App. S.D.2002) (quoting Brown v. Kirk-ham, 23 • S.W.3d 880, 882-83 (Mo.App. W.D.2000)).

Kirk v. Mercy Hospital Tri-County

851 S.W.2d 617 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1993

See Luethans v. Washington Univ., 838 S.W.2d 117, 119 (Mo.App.1992); Petersimes v. Crane Co., 835 S.W.2d 514, 517 (Mo.App.1992); Rothweil v. Wetterau, Inc., 820 S.W.2d 557, 559 (Mo.App.1991); Crockett v. … The Court relied on Wehr v.

Savory v. Hensick

143 S.W.3d 712 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2004

Charles Brown, another carpenter on the job, said the younger dog chewed on his tools and kept pulling his hat off of his head. He also asked Mr. Hensick and Ms. Davis directly, or through Mr. … Board of Curators, 51 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Mo.App.2001).

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Ripley County Bank

208 Mo. App. 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1921

[See: Prairie State Bank v. United States, 164 U. S. 227 ; Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co., 208 U. S. 404 ; Hardaway v. National Security Co., 211 U. S. 552 ; 25 R. C. L., p. 1383, sec. 65.] … [See: Prairie State Bank v. United States, 164 U. S. 227 .] II.

State ex rel. Dolgin's, Inc. v. Bolin

589 S.W.2d 106 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1979

R —V of Ozark County v. Lay, 358 S.W.2d 77, 79 (Mo.App.1962). … In conjunction with former Rule 52.11, Ozark County School Disk R-V of Ozark County v. Lay, supra, 358 S.W.2d at 80 , citing State ex rel. Farmers Mutuals Automobile Insurance Company v.

Shadowood Development Co. v. City of Lake St. Louis

668 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1984

Jones Construction Co. owners of a parcel known as Ravenwood was presented to the Board. … Comm. v. City of Sullivan, 520 SW2d 186 (Mo.App.1975). That case resolves ours. There the trial court excluded from evidence an agreement signed by the city’s mayor and also the board’s minute entry referring thereto.

Johnston v. Conger

854 S.W.2d 480 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1993

Spencer v. Crawford, 687 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Mo.App. 1985). … State v. Caston, 509 S.W.2d 39, 41 (Mo.1974).

De Runtz v. St. Louis Police Relief Ass'n

180 Mo. App. 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1913

Heaven v. Ziegenhein et al. (respondents there being the St. Louis Police Board), 144 Mo. 283 , 45 S. W. 1099 , and it was there held that the pension provision of that ‘law was unconstitutional. … As was said in State ex rel. v.

Charlier v. Corum

774 S.W.2d 518 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1989

The legislature inserted this language in response to this courts’ decision in Tribune Publishing Co. v. … In Baker v. St. Francis Levee Dist., 606 S.W.2d 668 (Mo.App.1980), it was held that the dismissal of a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus is not appealable. The court relied on State ex rel Brandon v.

State v. Gonzalez

108 S.W.3d 209 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2003

The police asked for consent to search, but were denied by the lessees, Atkinson and John Brown. Defendant, however, consented to a search of his room, i.e., the southwest bedroom. … In the southeast bedroom (Brown’s room), the police found 109 grams of marijuana, notes evidencing prior sales of marijuana, cash, and drug paraphernalia.

Hayes v. Fry

110 Mo. App. 20 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1904

[Brown’s Admr. v. Finley, 18 Mo. 1 . c. 378; Criddle’s Admr. v. Criddle, 21 Mo., 522 ; George v. Williamson, 26 Mo. 190 ; Merry v. Fremon, 44 Mo. 518 ; Jackson v. Robinson, 64 Mo. 1 . c. 292; Zoll v. … [Abbott v. Tenny, 18 N. H. 109; Cross v. Brown, 51 N. H. 486.] And the same is held in Maine. [McLean v. Weeks, 61 Maine 277 ; Frost v. Libby, 79 Maine 56 .]

Rolla Apartments/Overall Construction Industries, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

797 S.W.2d 781 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1990

Cass County v. … Anderson Motor Service Co. v.