Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.39s

  • Brandenburger v. Jefferson Club Ass'n

    88 Mo. App. 148 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1901

    The trial there, as here, was by the board of directors. Pitcher v. Board of Trade, 22 Ill. App. 319 ; see also People v. Board of Trade, 80 Ill. 104 ; Black & White Smith Co. v. Vandyke, 2 Whart. 309 ; Commonwealth v. … St. 301; Husey v. Gallagher, 61 Ga. 86 ; People v. Commercial Ass’n, 18 Abb. Pr. 271 ; White v. Brunnell, 2 Daly, 329 ; People v. Board of Trade, 45 Ill. 112 ; Green v. A. M. E. Soc., 1 S. & R. 254.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pugh v. St. Louis Police Relief Assn.

    237 Mo. App. 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1944

    [Fenton v. Thompson (Mo.), 176 S. W. (2d) 456 ; State ex rel. Connors v. Shelton, 238 Mo. 281 , 142 S. W. 417 .] … Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S. W. (2d) 943 . See also, 2 Sutherland on Statutory Construction (2 Bel.), section 363.]

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Cox Chapel School District No. 4 of Atchison County v. Atchison County Superintendent of Schools

    429 S.W.2d 348 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1968

    The board fixed March 11 as the date for the election of members of the board of education of the new district. … We so held in Lane v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Conlon Group, Inc. v. City of St. Louis

    980 S.W.2d 37 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1998

    Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). *40 A redevelopment agreement is no different from any other contract, and it is measured by the same tests and subject to the same rights and liabilities. Schweig v. … Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority for Kansas City, Mo. v. Waris, 790 S.W.2d at 455 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Newcomb v. Humansville R-IV School District

    908 S.W.2d 821 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1995

    Ross v. Robb, 662 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Mo. banc 1983). We also understand the Court of Appeals will view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision. Gamble v. … Nevels v. Board of Education, 822 S.W.2d 898 (Mo.App.1991).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rau v. St. Louis County Employees' Retirement Program

    69 S.W.3d 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2002

    Bollinger v. Wartman, 24 S.W.3d 731, 733 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). … Further, the Board claims that the juvenile court is bound by the stipulation of settlement entered in Kathryn Arnold, et al., v. Cary Ashley, et al, and St. Louis County, No. 315-196 (Cir.Ct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Cumley

    398 S.W.3d 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2013

    Section 586.140.2; Lagud v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, 136 S.W.3d 786, 790-91 (Mo. banc 2004); Stacy v. Harris, 321 S.W.3d 388, 393 (Mo.App. S.D.2010). … Orion Sec., Inc. v. Board of Police Comm’rs of Kansas City, 90 S.W.3d 157, 163 (Mo.App. W.D.2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Buffalo Trust Co. v. Producers Exchange No. 148

    224 Mo. App. 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1930

    [Fink v. Gregg Realty Co., 296 S.W. 838 , 839 and cases cited; Sparks v. The Dispatch Transfer Co., 104 Mo. 513 ; Magnolia Compress Warehouse Co. v. St. Louis Cash Register Co., 201 Mo. App. 201 , 207.] … [Bennett v. Potashnick, 214 Mo. App. 507 , 513; Bonner v. Lisenby, 86 Mo. App. 666 ; Hefferman v. Boteler, 87 Mo. App. l.c. 322; 1 Mechem on Agency (5 Ed.), sec. 717, page 506.]

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hankins v. State

    302 S.W.3d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2009

    v. … Brown, 179 S.W.3d at 407 . Point denied. In that the motion court reached the correct result, its order is affirmed. BATES, P.J., and BURRELL, J., Concur. 1 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Waters v. School District No. 4

    59 Mo. App. 580 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1894

    App. 355 ; Bank v. McMenamy, 35 Mo. App. 198 ; District v. Holmes, 53 Mo. App. 487 ; Bank v. Finks, 40 Mo. App. 367 . The issues in the case were very much narrowed down by the instructions. … Rutherford v. Hamilton, 97 Mo. 543 ; City of St. Joseph v. Farrell, 106 Mo. 437 ; State v. Dugan, 110 Mo. 138 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • White v. Bowman

    304 S.W.3d 141 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2009

    Board of Regents v. Harriman, 857 S.W.2d 445, 448 (Mo.App.1993). … Patterson v. Warten, Fisher, Lee & Brown, L.L.C., 260 S.W.3d 417, 419 (Mo.App.2008).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Camden County Public Water Supply District 4 v. Village of Sunrise Beach

    281 S.W.3d 893 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2009

    Gavin v. Gill, 688 S.W.2d 370 (Mo. banc 1985), <u. support for this argument. … Joseph v. Village of Country Club, 163 S.W.3d 905, 907 (Mo. banc 2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Null v. City of Grandview

    669 S.W.2d 78 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1984

    Sumpter v. City of Moberly, supra, l.c. 363, n. 4. … Louis Teachers Association v. Board of Education, 456 S.W.2d 16, 18 [3, 4] (Mo.1970). The judgment is affirmed. .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Haag v. Ward

    89 Mo. App. 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1901

    High on Receivers, sec. 254a; Smith v. Railway, supra; Barton v. Barbour, 104 U. S. 126 ; Brown v. Rauch, 1 Wash. 497 ; Garver v. Kent, 70 Ind. 428 ; Keen v. Breckenridge, supra; Martin v. Atchison, 2 Idaho 590 . … High on Receivers, p. 224; Brown v. Ranch, supra. The receiver by his appeal waived nothing. It will be seen from the two last-cited authorities that the rule laid down in Bornschein v. Finck, 13 Mo.

    Overruled in part by Reed v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad, 277 Mo. 79 (1919)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Snelling v. Middleton

    706 S.W.2d 891 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1986

    As the Supreme Court observed in Vanacek v. St. … On the other hand, the medical staff’s responsibility under the JCAH’s standards is to the board, and to the board alone. 3 See Pedroza v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Industrial Bearing & Transmission Co.

    575 S.W.2d 875 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1978

    Louis v. … On February 22, 1978, that court affirmed the Board decision and handed down its opinion granting enforcement of the Board’s order. Industrial Bearing & Transmission Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Hughes

    223 S.W.2d 106 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1949

    See State v. … Love v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sturdevant v. Fisher

    10 S.W.3d 184 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1999

    Holt v. Clarke, 965 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Mo.App.1998). … Rule 84.04(d); Blackstock v. Kohn, 1998 WL 726263 at 3.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Baer v. Campbell

    794 S.W.2d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1990

    Edmonds v. McNeal, 596 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Mo. banc 1980). … Ewbank v. Sayad, 669 S.W.2d 566, 567 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Riener v. Riener

    926 S.W.2d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1996

    We review in accord with Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Young Dental Manufacturing Co. v. Engineered Products, Inc., 838 S.W.2d 154,155 (Mo.App.E.D.1992); Brown v. Brown, 848 S.W.2d 551, 552 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.