Case law

City of Dexter v. McCollom

58 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1894

Brown, mayor of the city of Dexter, a city of the fourth class, upon the following complaint: “State of Missouri, h “County of Stoddard, ss“City of Dexter. . Before W. C. Brown, Mayor of the City of Dexter. … “City of Dexter, plaintiff, v. Jesse W. McCollum, and Newton Pardue, defendants. Jesse W. McCollum and Newton Pardue to the city of Dexter, Dr.

Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. Manion

297 S.W.2d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1956

Co. v. … .” *37 I11 Slocum v.

GJRB Ex Rel. RJK v. JKB

269 S.W.3d 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 2008

In a case with strikingly similar facts, the Eastern District of our court, in Brown v. … Brown, 141 S.W.3d at 82 .

Division of Employment Security v. Cusumano

785 S.W.2d 310 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1990

Cusumano cites three cases, In re Marriage of Haggard v. Haggard, 585 S.W.2d 480 (Mo. banc 1979), Thummel v. Thummel, 609 S.W.2d 175 (Mo.App.1980), and the consolidated appeal in Division of Employment Security v. … Smith and Division of Employment Security v. Brown, 615 S.W.2d 66 (Mo. banc 1981), to support her contention that the trial court’s order denying her Motion to Quash Garnishment is properly appealed.

State v. Perkins

753 S.W.2d 567 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 1988

In Mathis v. … In United States v. Brown, 466 F.2d 493 (10th Cir.1972), the defendant was convicted of making a false and fictitious statement likely to deceive a gun dealer in the acquisition of a firearm.

City of Kirkwood v. City of Sunset Hills

589 S.W.2d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1979

Trantina v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Retirement System, 503 S.W.2d 148, 152 (4] (Mo.App.1973); State ex rel. Burnau v. Valley Park Fire Protection Dist., 477 S.W.2d 734, 735 (2] (Mo.App.1972). … Askew v.

Monroe v. Missouri Department of Corrections

105 S.W.3d 915 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 2003

In Goings v. … Nixon v. Kelly, 58 S.W.3d 513, 519 (Mo. banc 2001).

Transit Casualty Co. in Receivership v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

963 S.W.2d 392 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1998

Transit relies on Abrams v. Four Seasons Lakesites/Chase Resorts, Inc., 904 S.W.2d 37 (Mo.App. S.D.1995). In Abrams , the plaintiff brought suit against the named defendants as well as one Peter Brown. … Sadler v. Board of Educ. of Cabool Sch. Dist., R-4, 851 S.W.2d 707, 712 (Mo.App. S.D.1993). Any ambiguities in a reinsurance agreement will be construed against the party who drafted the contract. Grave v.

Helbig v. Murray

558 S.W.2d 772 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1977

Kelley v. Schnebelen, 545 S.W.2d 332, 334 [1] (Mo.App.1976). … State v. Smith, 345 Mo. 1158 , 139 S.W.2d 929, 933 [5] (banc 1940).

Arnold v. McLeod

720 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1986

Board of Education Mt. Vernon Schools, Mt. Vernon v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 782 (Mo. banc 1976), quoting from Merideth v. Board of Education, 513 S.W.2d 740, 745 (Mo.App.1974). … See Bell v. Board of Education, 711 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Mo.App.1986).

Riordan v. Clark

67 S.W.3d 610 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2001

Charles v. City of St. Peters, 876 S.W.2d 46, 47-48 (Mo.App.1994). … Charles v. Mehan, 854 S.W.2d 531, 535 (Mo.App.1993)).

Edmisten v. Director of Revenue

92 S.W.3d 270 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2002

Wilcox v. Director of Revenue, 842 S.W.2d 240, 242 (Mo.App.1992). … State of Missouri v. Myers, 940 S.W.2d 64, 65 (Mo.App.1997). It is not essential that field sobriety tests be performed in order to show reasonable grounds. Todd A. Brown v.

State ex rel. McCain v. Acom

241 Mo. App. 446 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1951

Porter v. Hudson, et al. 226 Mo. 239 , l. c. 264, 126 S. … See Board of Commissioners v. Handley, (Fla.) 59 Southern, 14, and State v. Buckhannon, (W. Va.) 123 S. E. 182 .

State v. Goff

516 S.W.2d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1974

At trial, Miss Kauffman described the “male” who was driving as having brown or black hair and a beard. During several of the passes, Marina noted the man was wearing a small brown straw hat. … Defendant’s reliance on State v.

Friedman Textile Co. v. Northland Shopping Center, Inc.

321 S.W.2d 9 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1959

Rosen v. Alside, Inc., Mo., 248 S.W.2d 638 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Seegers v. Marx & Haas Clothing Co., 334 Mo. 632 , 66 S.W.2d 526 . … Rosen v. Alside, Inc., supra; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., supra; Seegers v. Marx & Haas Clothing Co., supra.

Bailey v. State Farmers Mutual Casualty Co.

377 S.W.2d 485 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1964

Vogeler v. Punch, 205 Mo. 558 , 103 S.W. 1001, 1005-1006 ; Caldwell v. Eubanks, 326 Mo. 185 , 30 S.W.2d 976, 979 , 72 A.L.R. 621 ; Schick v. Riemer, 263 S.W.2d 51, 54 . … Vogeler v. Punch, supra, 103 S.W. 1005 .

State v. Byrd

423 S.W.3d 882 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2014

State v. Johns, 34 S.W.3d 93, 116 (Mo. banc 2000) (citing State v. Deck, 994 S.W.2d 527, 543 (Mo. banc 1999)). … State v. Baumruk, 280 S.W.3d 600, 608 (Mo. banc 2009) (quoting State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995)). “[PJlain errors are those which are evident, obvious, and clear.” Id. (citation omitted).

Western Outdoor Advertising Co. of Nebraska v. Berbiglia, Inc.

263 S.W.2d 205 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1953

following facts: (1) the plaintiff is a “foreign corporation”; (2) it has never procured a “certificate of authority” to do business in this state; (3) its principal business is the manufacture of advertising signs or bill-boards … Ramlose, 210 Mo. 631 , 109 S.W. 567 ; Mandel Bros., Inc., *209 v. Henry A. O’Neil, Inc., 8 Cir., 69 F.2d 452 ; Browning v. City of Waycross, 233 U.S. 16 , 34 S.Ct. 578 , 58 L.Ed. 828 ; General Railway Signal Co. v.

Spotts v. City of Kansas City

728 S.W.2d 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1987

Board of Police Commissioners Sovereign immunity. 6. Sun Restaurants, Ltd. Carver v. Schafer, 647 S.W.2d 570 (Mo.App.1983), is not retroactive. … Although the Board may provide police protection for the municipality of Kansas City, it continues to be obligated, as a legal subdivision of the state. See State ex rel. Spink v.

State v. Abbott

547 S.W.2d 853 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1977

In State v. Brown, 502 S.W.2d 295, 299 [3, 4] (Mo.1973), the trial court failed to meet the requirements of Section 546.230 by simply stating at each recess that the jury was to “keep in mind” its previous admonition. … For the same reasons excusing literal compliance with § 546.230 in State v. Brown, supra, we find the error harmless in this case.” (Emphasis supplied) A very recent case of State v.