Case law

Bailey v. Phelps County Regional Medical Center

328 S.W.3d 770 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2010

S.D.2010) (quoting Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App. E.D.2004)). “ ‘An argument that violates Rule 84.04(i) wholly fails to preserve any error for review.’ ” Brown v. … Coale v. Hilles, 976 S.W.2d 61, 65 (Mo.App. S.D.1998). To interpret Appellant’s point as written would force us to advocate for Appellant, which we cannot do. Christomos v.

Albers v. Acme Paving & Crusher Co.

196 Mo. App. 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1917

[Kansas City Mill Co. v. Riley, 133 Mo. 574 ; Reid v. Board of Education, 73 Mo. 295 ; Longworth v. Sedevic, 165 Mo. 221 .] … [Meiners v. City of St. Louis, 130 Mo. 284 .]

Miller v. Enyeart

893 S.W.2d 901 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1995

Brown v. Beeney, 756 S.W.2d 940, 942 (Mo.App.1988) (citing Rule 78.07). The plaintiffs’ motion to set aside challenges the trial court’s order to dismiss. … Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). We are satisfied that the petition states a cause of action for ejectment, quiet title and reformation of a written instrument. See Flaspohler v.

Benton v. Windyville Consolidated School District, No. 32

228 Mo. App. 85 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1934

in support thereof: Boswell v. … W. (2d) 665 ; Baxter v. School Dist. of Miller, 260 S. W. 760 , and Edwards v. School Dist. No. 73, of Christian Co., 297 S. W. 1001 , and R. S. 1929, Sec. 9210.

Erickson v. Civic Plaza National Bank of Kansas City

422 S.W.2d 373 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1967

The names of the organizers and members of the board of directors were listed, among whom were defendants Barket and Truitt. Also listed as organizers and members of the board were Dan T. McKeever and Alfred C. … See also Kuraner v. Columbia National Bank of Kansas City, 230 Mo.App. 358 , 90 S.W.2d 465 ; Thornhill v. Masucci, 202 Mo.App. 357 , 216 S.W. 819 ; J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Brown Machinery Co., Mo.App., 14 S.W.2d 491 .

George Weis Co. v. Dwyer

867 S.W.2d 520 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1993

Rupard Asphalt Co., Inc. v. O’Dell, 382 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.App.1964) [1,2]; Energy Masters Corp. v. Fulson, 839 S.W.2d 665 (Mo.App.1992) [7]. … See Austin v. Ransdell, 207 Mo.App. 74 , 230 S.W. 334 (1921); Rupard Asphalt Co., Inc. v. O’ Dell, supra. In Austin the school board members were the only defendants, the contractors were not parties.

McNeil v. City of Cape Girardeau

153 Mo. App. 424 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1911

[Perrigo v. St. Louis, 185 Mo. 274 , 84 S. W. 30 ; Culler v. The Railroad, 84 Mo. App. *428 340 ; McRae v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 125 Mo. App. 562 , 102 S. W. 1032 .] … [Davidson v. The Transit Co., 211 Mo. 320 , 109 S. W. 583 ; Slaughter v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 116 Mo. 269 , 23 S. W. 760 ; O’Brien v. Loomis, 43 Mo. App. 29 ; Stoetzle v. Sweringen, 96 Mo. App. 592 , 70 S.

State v. Bibb

922 S.W.2d 798 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

This void in the rules was pointed out by our colleagues in the Western District in State v. Brown, 722 S.W.2d 613, 617 (Mo.App.1986). … We agree with the Brown court’s reasoning and rule in favor of the state.

State v. Gage

768 S.W.2d 174 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1989

He then told the officer he would find what he was looking for “in a brown paper bag located in [the back of his jeep].” … State v. Lowrance, 619 S.W.2d 354, 355 (Mo.App.1981).

Seger v. Downey

969 S.W.2d 298 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1998

We treat the AHC’s decision and the Board’s disciplinary order as one decision and as the final decision of the AHC subject to review. Larocca v. … See Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express, 819 S.W.2d 338, 341 (Mo. banc 1991); Perez v. State Bd. of Registration for the Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 165 (Mo.App.1991).

Dobyns v. Rice

22 Mo. App. 448 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1886

Liebke v. Knapp, 79 Mo. 27 ; Fontaine v. Boatmen’s Sa vings Institution, 57 Mo. 561; Hollocher v. Hollocher, 62 Mo. 267 ; Baile v. Insurance Co., 73 Mo. 371 Hall v. Morgan, 79 Mo. 51 . … Beshears v. Rowe, 46 Mo. 503 . See, also, Hale v. Stuart, 76 Mo. 22 , and Browne v. Browne, 47 Mo. 130 . III.

Security Savings Trust Co. v. Donnell

81 Mo. App. 147 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1895

The following authorities are in point: Curtis v. Whitney, 13 Wall. 68 ; Tennessee v. Sneed, 96 U. S. 69 ; Moore v. Mansert, 49 N. Y. 332 ; Oullahan v. Sweeney, 79 Cal. 537 ; Gage v. Seewart, 127 Ill. 207 ; Plum v. … Co. v. Hill, 86 Mo. 466 ; State v. Jackson, 105 Mo. 199 ; 23 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law, 450, and cases cited. 2. As well expressed by the supreme court of the United States in Tennessee v.

Polish Roman Catholic St. Stanislaus Parish v. Hettenbach

303 S.W.3d 591 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2010

Wallace v. Munton, 989 S.W.2d 641, 645 (Mo.App. S.D.1999) (quoting State ex rel. Chassaing v. Mummert, 887 S.W.2d 573, 577 (Mo. banc 1994)). … Corp. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 588 F.2d 221, 225 (7th Cir.1978); Chrispens v. Coastal Ref. & Mktg., Inc., 257 Kan. 745 , 897 P.2d 104, 111 (1995).

Crutchfield v. City of Warrensburg

30 Mo. App. 456 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1888

Thrush v. City of Cameron, supra; The Board of Commissioners of Cass County v. Ross, 46 Ind. 404 ; McDonald v. Mayor, 68 N. Y. 23 . Not even if a majority of the board had sanctioned it. Butler v. … In Woolfolk v.

McIlhenny v. Kansas City

188 Mo. App. 218 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1915

The walk was constructed of boards two inches thick and eight inches wide, laid over stringers. It was in bad condition; there being loose boards and in places boards were out altogether. … [Graney v. St. Louis, 141 Mo. 180 ; Chilton v. St. Joseph, 143 Mo. 192 ; Devlin v. St. Louis, 252 Mo. 203 ; Howards v. New Madrid, 148 Mo. App. 57 ; Lueking v. Sedalia, 181 Mo. App. 203 .] The judgment is affirmed.

Stanfield v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n

588 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1979

Merriman v. Caton, 395 S.W.2d 106, 109 [1-3] (Mo.1965). … Maddock v. Lewis, 386 S.W.2d 406, 410 [5] (Mo.1965).

Shelton v. City of Springfield

130 S.W.3d 30 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2004

Grime v. Altec Indus., 83 S.W.3d 581, 583 (Mo.App. W.D.2002); see also Davies v. Carter Carburetor, 429 S.W.2d 738, 749 (Mo.1968); McCoy v. Simpson, 346 Mo. 72 , 139 S.W.2d 950, 952 (1940). … See Elliott v. Indiana Western Express, 118 S.W.3d 297, 299 (Mo.App. S.D.2003) (quoting Garibay v. Treasurer of Missouri, 930 S.W.2d 57, 59 (Mo.App. E.D.1996)); see also Cochran v. Indus.

Chamberlain v. Spalding

237 Mo. App. 1040 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1943

Brown, designated as second party, is shown as duly signed. … Secuundum, “Agency”, par. 214; Hotel Co. v. Furniture Co., 73 Mo. App. 138 ; International Store Co. v. Barns, 3 S. W. (2d) 1039 .]. In Hotel Company v.

Williams v. City of Kansas City

841 S.W.2d 193 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1992

Best v. … See Munz v.

Seabaugh v. Cassell

998 S.W.2d 593 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1999

We review Board’s decision, not the circuit court’s judgment. McCall v. Goldbaum, 863 S.W.2d 640, 642 (Mo.App.1993). … Prenger v. Moody, 845 S.W.2d 68, 73-74 (Mo.App.1992).