Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.33s

  • Hemphill v. Kansas City

    100 Mo. App. 563 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1903

    Perrette v. Kansas City, 162 Mo. 244 . Baustian v. Young, 152 Mo. 318 (l. c. 326), may be cited as an authority also upholding the action of the court in giving it. … Bank v. Murdock, 62 Mo. 70 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Clinch v. Heartland Health

    187 S.W.3d 10 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2006

    During September, the board decided to exclude, temporarily, non-employed physicians from providing cardiovascular services at the hospital, and the board made the exclusion permanent during March 2002. … Brown Shoe Company v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); Atlantic Richfield Company v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Mercantile Trust Co. v. Carp

    648 S.W.2d 920 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1983

    Ralston Purina Co. v. Nabisco Inc., 541 F.2d 679, 684 (8th Cir.1976); Restate *924 ment of Contracts, supra, § 31; see also Industrial Bank & Trust Co. v. Hesselberg, 195 S.W.2d 470 , 474 (Mo.1946) and Miner v. … Pruellage v. De Seaton Corporation, 380 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. 1964); Brewer v. Blanton, 555 S.W.2d 381, 383 (Mo.App.1977). 2 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Favorite v. Cottrill

    62 Mo. App. 119 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1895

    The English rule, as-declared by Lord Holt in the case of Lane v. … Alabama, etc., Railroad Co. v. Sellers, 93 Ala. 9 ; Wilson v. Vaughn, 23 Fed. Rep. 229; Hefley v. Baker, 19 Kan. 9 ; 1 Sedgwick on Damages [8 Ed.], sec. 361.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Bushcheney 2000, Inc. v. Baker

    34 S.W.3d 410 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2000

    Relators Board of Election Commissioners of the City of St. Louis (“Board”) and Bush-Cheney 2000, Inc., separately filed petitions with this court seeking to prohibit Respondent Judge Evelyn M. … Memphis v. Hackman, 273 Mo. 670 , 202 S.W. 7, 14 (1918)(characterizing statute as directory rather than mandatory). 4 . In Armantrout v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Off. of Pub. Counsel v. Pub. Serv. Com'n

    326 S.W.3d 868 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2010

    Brown v. Wheatley, 306 S.W.3d 664, 665 (Mo.App. S.D.2010). Nonetheless, we have elected to exercise our discretion to entertain OPC's appeal, as we are able to discern the nature of the issues raised by OPC on appeal. … Board of Prob. & Parole, 299 S.W.3d 33 , 36 (Mo.App. W.D.2009).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Alnutt

    72 Mo. App. 62 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1897

    Foster v. Reynolds, 38 Mo. 553 ; Henderson v. Henderson, 13 Mo. 151 ; Baile v. Ins. Co., 73 Mo. 306 ; Sparks v. Brown, 46 Mo. App. 529 ; Sparks v. Brown, 33 Mo. App. 505 ; Quick v. Turner, 26 Mo. App. 29 ; McKinster v. … Y. 280 ; Lawrence v. Tucker, 23 How. (U. S.) 14; Goodheart v. Johnson, 68 Ill. 61 ; Cobbey on Chat. Mort., secs. 120, 121.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri, el rel. Attorney General Eric Schmitt v. City of St. Louis

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 2022

    Holmes v. Steelman, 624 S.W.3d 144, 148 (Mo. banc 2021); see also ITT Com. Fin. Corp. v. Mid.- Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). … Until 2005, SLEF included coverage for the Board as an agency of the State and for SLMPD officers as officers of the State. Holmes, 624 S.W.3d at 149-50; see also Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dobyns v. Rice

    22 Mo. App. 448 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1886

    Liebke v. Knapp, 79 Mo. 27 ; Fontaine v. Boatmen’s Sa vings Institution, 57 Mo. 561; Hollocher v. Hollocher, 62 Mo. 267 ; Baile v. Insurance Co., 73 Mo. 371 Hall v. Morgan, 79 Mo. 51 . … Beshears v. Rowe, 46 Mo. 503 . See, also, Hale v. Stuart, 76 Mo. 22 , and Browne v. Browne, 47 Mo. 130 . III.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Chamberlain v. Spalding

    237 Mo. App. 1040 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1943

    Brown, designated as second party, is shown as duly signed. … Secuundum, “Agency”, par. 214; Hotel Co. v. Furniture Co., 73 Mo. App. 138 ; International Store Co. v. Barns, 3 S. W. (2d) 1039 .]. In Hotel Company v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Turner

    716 S.W.2d 462 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1986

    Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 737 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). 4 In the present case the officers did not have a search warrant nor did they have the owner’s consent. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 739 , 103 S.Ct. 1541 . 6 . The principles of Miranda only apply to custodial interrogation. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 , 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1612 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Youmans v. Everett

    173 Mo. App. 671 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1913

    (Richardson v. Walsh, 142 Mo. App. 328 ; McCormick v. Moore, 134 Mo. App. 669 ; Barton v. Kansas City, 110 Mo. App. l. c. 40; Dickey v. Holmes, 109 Mo. 721 .) … In Curtice v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vogel v. Hall Implement Co.

    551 S.W.2d 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1977

    Merriman v. Ben Gutman Truck Service, Incorporated, 392 S.W.2d 292, 296 [1-3] (Mo.1965); Brown v. Missouri *924 Lumber Transports, Inc., 456 S.W.2d 306, 307 (Mo.1970); Slider v. … Brown Shoe Company, 308 S.W.2d 306, 307 [1, 2] (Mo.App.1957); Stegall v. St. Joseph Lead Company, 465 S.W.2d 855, 861 [3] (Mo.App.1971); Saale v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Sappington

    261 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1953

    Compton Co. v. Walter, 324 Mo. 290 , 23 S.W.2d 167, 171 . … No. 1 of Mississippi & New Madrid Counties v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Albers v. Acme Paving & Crusher Co.

    196 Mo. App. 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1917

    [Kansas City Mill Co. v. Riley, 133 Mo. 574 ; Reid v. Board of Education, 73 Mo. 295 ; Longworth v. Sedevic, 165 Mo. 221 .] … [Meiners v. City of St. Louis, 130 Mo. 284 .]

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Churchir

    658 S.W.2d 35 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1983

    Immediately before the arrest, Huffman observed appellant getting out of a brown automobile and entering a basement apartment. … State v. Hicks, 591 S.W.2d 184, 192 (Mo.App.1979).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Revelle

    957 S.W.2d 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1997

    Brown, 490 F.2d 758, 774-780 (D.C.Cir.1973); and State v. Singh, 586 S.W.2d 410, 417-19 (Mo.App. … Kelley also relies heavily on Brown and Singh .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Irwin v. Kansas City

    173 Mo. App. 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1913

    [Carrington v. City of St. Louis, 89 Mo. 208 .] … [Reed v. City of Mexico, 101 Mo. App. 155 , l. c. 158.] In Beauvais v. City of St.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lamar Co., LLC v. City of Kansas City

    330 S.W.3d 767 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2010

    Precision Invs., L.L.C. v. … Similarly, in Veal v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Delmar Investment Co. v. Lewis

    180 Mo. App. 22 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1913

    Our Supreme Court in Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co., 224 Mo. 369 , 123 S. … Noticing a decision by the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Rackliff v. Peters, 136 Mo. App. 168 , 115 S.

    Overruled in part by Delmar Investment Co. v. Lewis, 271 Mo. 317 (1917)Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.