Case law

Scarritt v. St. John's Methodist Episcopal Church

7 Mo. App. 174 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1879

The witness further says that he thinks he delivered the answer of the board to *178 Bussell Scarritt. … Kings v. Wood, 7 Mo. 390 . The evidence in the case was insufficient to establish the contract set up in the petition, and no error was committed in refusing to set aside the judgment of nonsuit.

Rodgers v. Kansas City

327 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1959

Brown v. City of Craig, 350 Mo. 836 , 168 S.W.2d 1080 . Public funds are trust funds and public policy does not permit them to be diverted from the purposes for which they are raised by taxation.” … Plaintiff dived from the board and was injured. His petition alleged (1) Negligence in maintaining such diving board without warning of its danger and (2) That the same was “inherently dangerous and unsafe.”

Williams v. Alnutt

72 Mo. App. 62 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1897

Foster v. Reynolds, 38 Mo. 553 ; Henderson v. Henderson, 13 Mo. 151 ; Baile v. Ins. Co., 73 Mo. 306 ; Sparks v. Brown, 46 Mo. App. 529 ; Sparks v. Brown, 33 Mo. App. 505 ; Quick v. Turner, 26 Mo. App. 29 ; McKinster v. … Y. 280 ; Lawrence v. Tucker, 23 How. (U. S.) 14; Goodheart v. Johnson, 68 Ill. 61 ; Cobbey on Chat. Mort., secs. 120, 121.

State ex rel. Gray v. O'Leary

602 S.W.2d 473 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1980

Cardinal Glennon Memorial Hospital for Children v. … Nesbit v. Lasky, 546, S.W.2d 51, 53 (Mo.App.1977). See also St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v.

Bixler v. Special Road District No. 1

236 Mo. App. 336 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1941

Plaintiff also cites the cases of Buchanan v. Ralls County, 222 S. W. 1002 , 283 Mo. 10 ; Harkreader v. … W. (2d) 539 ; Metz v. Warrick et al., 217 Mo. App. 504 , 269 S. W. 626 ; Layne-Western Co. v. Buchanan County, Missouri, 85 Fed. (2d) 343, and other similar cases.

Willsey v. WC Porter Farms Company

522 S.W.2d 29 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1975

Robbins v. Robbins, 328 S.W.2d 552, 556 [7, 9] (Mo.1959); Nutz v. Shepherd, 490 S.W.2d 366, 369 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1973); Stanziale v. Musick, 370 S.W.2d 261, 265 [2, 3] (Mo.1963); Shell-Con, Inc. v. … Josephine Hospital Corportaion v. Modoc Realty Co., 307 Mo. 336 , 270 S.W. 638, 641 [2] (1925); Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Northwestern Bank, 315 Mo. 849 , 288 S.W. 359, 362 [1] (banc 1926); Roth v. J. N.

Space Planners Architects, Inc. v. Frontier Town-Missouri, Inc.

107 S.W.3d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 2003

Any corporation that intends to do engineering or architectural work in Missouri must register with the Board by obtaining a certificate of authority. § 327.401.2; 7 Maran-Cooke, Inc. v. … from Board.

In Re Kw

344 S.W.3d 302 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2011

Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. V.S. (Natural Mother), Appellant. No. WD 73491. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. August 9, 2011. Anne-Linton Pond Hendrickson and Christopher S. … Brown, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. *303 Lori L. Stipp, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent. Katherine J. Rodgers, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem. Before Division I: VICTOR C.

Holigan Homes Missouri, Ltd. v. City of Jackson

997 S.W.2d 109 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1999

Smith v. Morton, 890 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). … Drury Displays, Inc. v. City of Olivette, 976 S.W.2d 634, 635 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). The Board’s findings and decision will be reversed only if there is no substantial evidence to support it. Weber v.

Moss v. Nooter Corporation

344 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1961

Negligence § 43(3), p. 510; Happy v. Walz, 358 Mo. 56 , 213 S.W.2d 410 , loc. cit. 414, 415; Meyer v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 241 Mo.App. 1057 , 253 S.W.2d 525 ; Evans v. … Philibert v.

The Arbors at Sugar Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Company, Inc., Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and McKelvey Homes, LLC, Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2014

See Klonoski v. … to the board.

Chambers ex rel. Abel v. Rice

858 S.W.2d 230 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1993

On that subject, both sides discuss Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, 820 S.W.2d 327 (Mo.App.S.D.1991). … There are cases such as Estate of Schubert v.

Porter v. Lake Waukomis Ass'n

687 S.W.2d 237 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1985

In Kawin v. Chrysler Corp., 636 S.W.2d 40, 43 (Mo. banc 1982), the court stated: The term “replace”, [with new parts] given its plain and ordinary construction, means to supplant with a substitute or equivalent. … The board lost its attempt to enforce its interpretation of its restrictions against Porter. It is settled *240 that attorney fees in such circumstances may be awarded only when the suit is successful. Porter v.

Weaver v. African Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.

54 S.W.3d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2001

Thus, in Hutchison v. … The parties agreed that the claims against AME, Bishop Byrd and the Board of Incorpo-rators would be collectively submitted against AME. 7 .

Royal Meat Products Co. v. Kansas City, Mo.

240 Mo. App. 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1948

Lamm v. Mid-State Serum Company, 265 S.W. 878 , l.c. 879. The board found that the zoning ordinance of 1941 was being violated as follows: "7. … Voorhees v. Faust, 189 N.W. 1006 , l.c. 1007.

Commerce Trust Co. v. Lot Co. and Johnson

208 Mo. App. 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1921

[Farrar v. City of St. Louis, 80 Mo. 379 ; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. 259 ; *265 Adams v. Lindell, 5 Mo. App. 197 ; Adams v. Lindell, 72 Mo. 198 .] The word “assessment” is used in more than one sense. … by said Board.”

State Ex Rel. v. Hill

212 Mo. App. 173 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1923

[State ex rel. v. Dawson, 284 Mo. 490 , 225 S.W. 97 ; Elsberry Drainage District v. Meyers, 284 Mo. 490 , 209 S.W. 913 ; Pemiscot County v. McCarty, 276 Mo. l.c. 537 , 538 , 208 S.W. 450 ; State ex rel. … Co. v. Hughes, ___ Mo. ___, 240 S.W. 802 , l.c. 805, Col. 2; State ex inf. McAllister v.

Roberts v. Hagen

908 S.W.2d 819 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1995

Weber v. Les Petite Academies, 548 S.W.2d 847, 852 (Mo.App.1976); Cheatham v. Melton, 593 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Mo.App.1980). … West v. Director, Mo. Div. of Family Serv., 821 S.W.2d 873, 875 (Mo.App.1991). “In reviewing an administrative decision, the court may not infer findings from the ultimate decision.” Standard Oil Div. Etc. v.

Hutchinson v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co.

721 S.W.2d 158 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1986

Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 [2] (Mo.App.1952); Williams v. International Shoe Co., 213 S.W.2d 657 , 662[6] (Mo.App.1948); Driemeyer v. … In Wynn v.

State v. Fisher

504 S.W.2d 281 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1973

Instructions No. 6 and 7, permitting the jury, after determining defendant’s guilt, to defer assessment of his punishment to the court, are free of error under State v. Brown, 443 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. banc 1969). … See also the following cases subscribing to the rule laid down in Brown: State v. Rand, 496 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.App.1973); State v. Bolden, 494 S.W.2d 61 (Mo.1973); State v. Daugherty, 484 S.W.2d 236 (Mo.1972); State v.