Case law

State ex rel. Maddox v. Garner

459 S.W.2d 40 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1970

State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. … State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Elliott, Mo.

Paris v. Keefhaver

512 S.W.2d 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1974

Following these statements is a long line of decisions, culminating in Strickner v. Brown, 491 S.W.2d 253 (Mo.1973). It matters not that plaintiffs’ evidence of damage was un-controverted. … [Liberty Loan Ass’n of Antioch v. Brown, 493 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1973)], has chosen not to do so. The judgment will therefore not be disturbed, and Point I is overruled.

Sugarbaker v. SSM Health Care

946 S.W.2d 280 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1997

Sugarbaker to the Board of Healing Arts. The Board of Healing Arts, in turn, communicated the report to the Data Bank. Dr. … Pope v. Howard, 907 S.W.2d 257, 258 (Mo.App. W.D.1995); Cross v. Cross, 815 S.W.2d 65, 66 (Mo.App.1991). “A case is moot when some event occurs making it impossible for the reviewing court to grant relief.”

Redpath Bros. v. Lawrence

42 Mo. App. 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1890

Browne on Fraud, supra. In Peek v. Gurney, L. R. 6 H. … Dulaney v. Rogers, 64 Mo. 201 ; Browne on Frauds, 474; Commonweafh v. Ins. Co. 120 Mass. 495 . The petition does not charge defendants with the suppression of the truth, but with an affirmative misstatement of a fact.

Morgan v. State

569 S.W.2d 16 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1978

In consideration of appellant’s second claim, neither citation to Brown v. State, 436 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.1969), nor Baker v. State, 532 S.W.2d 897 (Mo.App.1976), is apposite. … See also Stout v. State, 543 S.W.2d 797, 798 (Mo.

Davis v. State

745 S.W.2d 782 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1988

Drew v. State, 436 S.W.2d 727, 729 (Mo.1969); Toler v. State, 542 S.W.2d 80, 83 (Mo.App.1976). … Brown, what would the State recommend? What does the State recommend on a guilty plea? MR. BROWN: The State would recommend life sentences on both charges, Your Honor, imposed and executed. THE COURT: Mr.

Lmk v. Dek

685 S.W.2d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1985

Brown v. Brown, 609 S.W.2d 223 (Mo.App.1980) [7]; Amber B. v. Leland S., 592 S.W.2d 201 (Mo.App.1979) [1]. … Brown v. Brown, supra , [7]. The absence of the presumptive father and a guardian ad litem for Stacey obviated development of evidence meeting that test.

Woodson v. City of Kansas City

80 S.W.3d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2002

In Points II and V, he claims that the Board’s requisite findings of fact and conclusions of law in affirming the demolition order were deficient and did not support its decision. … When a decision of an administrative agency or board in a contested case, as authorized by § 536.100, is appealed, we review the agency or board’s decision, not the judgment of the circuit court. Graves v.

Diekroeger v. Jones

235 Mo. App. 1117 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1941

[Houck et al. v. Little River Drainage District, 248 Mo. 373 ; Mississippi & Fox River Dist. v. Ruddick, 64 S. W. (2d) 306 ; Bushnell v. Mississippi & Fox River Dist., 111 S. W. (2d) 946 .] … To like effect is the ruling in the case of the City of Fort Madison v.

Arp v. Arp

572 S.W.2d 232 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1978

Defendant cites In Re Marriage of Vanet, 544 S.W.2d 236 (Mo.App.1976); Foster v. Foster, 537 S.W.2d 833 (Mo.App.1976); and Brown v. … C. v. L. C. C., 559 S.W.2d 623 (Mo.App.1977); In Re Marriage of Prenavo, 556 S.W.2d 463, 466 (Mo.App.1977); C_ L_ R_ v.

Rodgers v. Kansas City

327 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1959

Brown v. City of Craig, 350 Mo. 836 , 168 S.W.2d 1080 . Public funds are trust funds and public policy does not permit them to be diverted from the purposes for which they are raised by taxation.” … Plaintiff dived from the board and was injured. His petition alleged (1) Negligence in maintaining such diving board without warning of its danger and (2) That the same was “inherently dangerous and unsafe.”

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2015

ED101430 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V QUANTRELL COLEMAN, APP 2. ED102069 C.K., RES V B.G.B., APP 3. ED102083 SAUDI BROWN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 4. ED102134 JOSEPH A. … ED101796 FANNIE MAE APP V UNIV VILLAGE APTS RES/CR APP 2. ED102298 WILLIE RANDLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

State Ex Rel. Kemberling v. Peterson

240 Mo. App. 700 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1948

S. 1939, and State ex rel. v. Keirnan, 207 S. W. (2d) 49 . … Hewlett v. Womach, 355 M. 486, 196 S. W. (2d) 809 .

Jones v. Purity Textiles Corp.

328 S.W.2d 714 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1959

Blew v. Conner, Mo.App., 310 S.W.2d 294 . … McFall v. Barton-Mansfield Co., 333 Mo. 110 , 61 S.W.2d 911 . Under this point defendants rely upon the case of Brown v. Douglas Candy Co., Mo.App., 277 S.W.2d 657 .

Estate of Young

185 S.W.3d 767 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2006

See also Cruce v. … In Enright v.

Moore v. City of University City

851 S.W.2d 118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1993

Stoup v. Board of Trustees of Pension Fund, 789 S.W.2d 221, 222 (Mo. App.E.D.1990). Point denied. III. … See Franklin v. Board of Directors, School Dist. of Kansas City, 772 S.W.2d 873, 883 (Mo.App.W.D.1989).

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2015

ED100934 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CEDRIC E. ANDERSON, APP 2. ED101638 JAMES ANDERSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 3. ED101763 WILLIAM BROWN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 4. … ED101807 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEVEN LEE WILLIAMS, APP 5. ED101855 GERALD EDWARDS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 6. ED101863 TERRELL HUGHES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES 7.

Beckmann v. Mepham

97 Mo. App. 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1902

Purcell v. Miner, 4 Wall. 517 ; Browne, St. Frauds, sec. 271. It is moreover undoubted law that “if part of an entire contract is within the statute [of frauds] the whole is governed by it.” 2 Reed, St. … King v. Wood, 7 Mo. 389 ; Fox v. Courtney, 111 Mo. 147 Ringer v. Holtzclaw, 112 Mo. 519 ; Whalen v. Hinchman, 22 Mo. App. (K. C.) 483; Weil v. Willard, 55 Mo. App. (St. L.) 376.

Ban v. State

554 S.W.3d 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2018

(quoting Routt v. State , 493 S.W.3d 904 , 910-11 (Mo, App. E.D. 2016) ). … Parrott v. Martinez , 496 S.W.3d 563 , 570 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).

Andrew Denney v. Syberg's Westport, Inc., d/b/a Syberg's

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2023

Brown, 456 S.W.3d at 870. … Brown, 456 S.W.3d at 870. Point V is denied.