Case law

Butz v. Murch Bros. Construction Co.

137 Mo. App. 222 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1909

[Butz v. Const. Co., 199 Mo. 279 .] … [Sheperd v. Transit Co., 189 Mo. 362 ; Flori v. St. Louis, 69 Mo. 341 ; Flynn v. Bridge Co., 42 Mo. App. 529 .]

Stewart Concrete & Material Co. v. James H. Stanton Construction Co.

433 S.W.2d 76 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

In Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. et al., 350 Mo. 1178 , 171 S. … Plaintiff quotes as follows from our Supreme Court en banc in the case of Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown.

Waller v. City of Macon

277 S.W.2d 886 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1955

Brown v. Town of Westport, supra [ 116 Mo. 582 , 22 S.W. 888 ], it was held that but one ordinance was necessary, and we will so hold in this case.” … Earl V.

State v. Mays

884 S.W.2d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1994

Betts a brown vial, and Mr. Betts poured a liquid from a vanilla bottle into the brown vial and handed it to Detective Quinlan. Detective Quinlan then gave $30 to Mr. … In State v.

State ex rel. Maddox v. Garner

459 S.W.2d 40 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1970

State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. … State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Elliott, Mo.

Young v. Consolidated School District No. 3

196 Mo. App. 419 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1917

The Supreme Court, in State ex rel. v. Jones, 155 Mo. 570, 576 , 56 S. … This plainly implies the right of the school board,, and not the voters, to select all new school house sites in city, town and consolidated districts. In Martin v. Bennett, 139 Mo. App. 237, 245 , 122 S.

Mathews v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

156 Mo. App. 715 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1911

[Stager v. Railroad, 119 Pa. St. 70.]” … [Booth on Street Railway Law, sec. 336; Briggs v. Railroad, 148 Mass. 75 ; Morrison v. Raiload, 130 N. Y. 169 . Blumenthal v. Broch, 126 Mo. 1 . c. 676.]”

Chaney v. State

223 S.W.3d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 2007

Brown v. State, 821 S.W.2d 113, 117 (Mo.App.1991); see Samuels v. State, 770 S.W.2d 717, 722 (Mo.App.1989). … Brown, 821 S.W.2d at 117 .

State v. Hill

996 S.W.2d 544 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1999

As the officers arrived, they noticed a brown Ford Tempo parked in Hill’s driveway with a white plastic bag in the front seat. … State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Mo. banc 1992), quoting State v. Kraus, 530 S.W.2d 684, 685 (Mo. banc 1975).

State v. Hunter

783 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1990

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). … In State v.

Woodson v. City of Kansas City

80 S.W.3d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2002

In Points II and V, he claims that the Board’s requisite findings of fact and conclusions of law in affirming the demolition order were deficient and did not support its decision. … When a decision of an administrative agency or board in a contested case, as authorized by § 536.100, is appealed, we review the agency or board’s decision, not the judgment of the circuit court. Graves v.

Hudson v. State

190 S.W.3d 434 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2006

(quoting State v. Brown, 998 S.W.2d 531, 550 (Mo. banc 1999)). I. … See State v.

Spengler v. Kaufman & Wilkinson

43 Mo. App. 5 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1890

It would seem that the trial court concluded that, under the decisions of Brown v. Brown, 68 Mo. 388 , and Whitehead v. … But Brown v. Brown , and the subsequent case of Blandy v.

River Fleets, Inc. v. Carter

990 S.W.2d 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1999

Appellant resubmitted its request for a refund to the new board of trustees in February, 1997. On June 19, 1997 the board approved the refund request but denied a request for interest on the refunded fees. … Among the numerous cases supporting this well settled proposition is Beatty v. Metropolitan St.

De Andrea Gray v. State of Missouri

498 S.W.3d 522 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 2016

Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 730 (Mo. banc 2002), disagreed with on unrelated grounds by State ex rel. Zinna v. Steele, 301 S.W.3d 510, 516-17 (Mo. banc 2010). … State v. Onate, 398 S.W.3d 102, 106 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013) (quoting Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 731 n.5).

Raney v. Home Insurance

213 Mo. App. 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1922

In that year he was sued by one William Brown and fearing that Brown might recover a judgment against him, he conveyed this land to his minor son, C. E. … [Lee v. Bowman, 55 Mo. 400 ; Brown v. Baldwin, 121 Mo. 106 , 25 S. W. 858 ; Marlow v. Liter, 87 Mo. App. 584 ; Richmond v. Ashcraft, 137 Mo. App. 191 , 117 S. W. 689 .]

Duckworth v. Sayad

670 S.W.2d 88 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1984

Worley v. Whaley, 586 S.W.2d 721, 722 (Mo.App.1979). … We find the amended charge neither unconstitutionally vague per se, Milani v. Miller, 515 S.W.2d 412, 416 (Mo.1974); Vorbeck v.

Wells v. National Surety Co.

194 Mo. App. 389 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1916

It is certain that the board of directors of the hank was authorized to discontinue plaintiff’s services as cashier on May 3, as it did, and this is true notwithstanding the record of the board, made in February, to the effect … Court in the case of State v. Lentz, 184 Mo. 223, 237, 241 , 83 S. W. 970 , *396 and the same view expressed concerning the intent essential to sustain a conviction under it.

Andrew Denney v. Syberg's Westport, Inc., d/b/a Syberg's

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2023

Brown, 456 S.W.3d at 870. … Brown, 456 S.W.3d at 870. Point V is denied.

State Ex Rel. Watkins v. Watkins

972 S.W.2d 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1998

Brown v. Brown, 670 S.W.2d 167, 170 (Mo.App.1984). … The rationale for this rule is stated in Wisdom v.