Case law

Nuckols v. Andrews Investment Company

364 S.W.2d 128 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1962

In April, 1960, Butch went to work for the Johnsons as a regular farm hand for $80.00 per month, plus room and board, and was so employed at the time of his death on July 11, 1960. … On this subject, see Loyal’s Auto Exchange v. Munch, 153 Neb. 628 , 45 N.W. 2d 913, 921 (12); Brown v. Kroger Company, Mo.App., 358 S.W.2d 429, 434 ; Brown v. Kroger Company, Mo.Sup., 344 S.W.2d 80 (17); Kaufman v.

State ex rel. Yates v. Mock

420 S.W.2d 4 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1967

In England v. Eckley (Mo.) 330 S.W.2d 738, 743 , the court held that the provisions of the above section of the statute contemplate the continued existence of both (or all) of the districts affected. … See England v. Eckley, supra (Mo.) 330 S.W.2d 738, 743 . MAUGHMER, C., concurs. PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of SPERRY, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All concur.

Nixon v. Lichtenstein

959 S.W.2d 854 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1997

Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App.E.D.1994). The standard of review is governed by Rule 73.01(c) and Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). … Hillyard v. Leonard, 391 S.W.2d 211, 223 (Mo.1965).

Smith v. State

680 S.W.2d 412 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1984

State v. Brown, 554 S.W.2d 574 (Mo.App.1977). Movant contends that Baker applies here and dismisses the factual distinctions between Baker and this case. … In State v. Brown, 554 S.W.2d 574 (Mo.App.1977), defendant was convicted simultaneously in one court of both manslaughter and carrying a concealed weapon.

Citizens for Environmental Safety, Inc. v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources

12 S.W.3d 720 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1999

Valentine v. Board of Police Comm’rs of Kansas City, 813 S.W.2d 955, 957 (Mo.App.1991). … Competitive Telecommunications v. Missouri Pub. Serv.

Hribernik v. Reorganized School District R-3

276 S.W.2d 596 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1955

Koch v. Board of Regents, etc., supra, 265 S.W.2d 424 ; State ex rel. Myers v. Shinnick, Mo.Sup., 19 S.W.2d 676 , 678. … Myers v. Shinnick, supra, 19 S.W.2d 678 ; Koch v. Board of Regents, etc., supra, 265 S.W.2d 424 ; Fugel v. Becker, supra, 2 S.W.2d 746 . An injunction was sought by taxpayers in Hurtgen v.

Fairbanks, Marsh & Co. v. Crescent Elevator Co.

52 Mo. App. 627 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1893

As said in DeWitt v. … Brown v. Gas Co., 16 Wis. 556 ; Brown v. Wright, 25 Mo. App. 58 ; Phillips on Mechanics’ Liens, sec. 283. Judgment reversed and cause remanded. All concur.

Farmers & Merchants Bank of St. Clair v. Burns & Hood Motor Co.

295 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1956

Parsons v. Guarantee Inv. Co., 64 Mo.App. 32 , loc. cit. 35, and cases cited; Magnolia Compress & Warehouse Co. v. St. Louis Cash Register Co., 201 Mo.App. 201 , 210 S.W. 125 ; Johnson v. … Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, Mo.App., 287 S.W. 835 ; Jones v. Montieth, Mo.App., 34 S.W.2d 1014 ; Osmer v. LeMay-Wegmann Brokerage Co., 155 Mo.App. 211 , 134 S.W. 65 ; Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.

WCT & D, LLC v. City of Kansas City, Missouri

476 S.W.3d 336 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2015

Cashew appealed to the Liquor Control Review Board. … Standard of Review “On appeal from a circuit court’s review of an [administrative] decision, this [c]ourt reviews the [Board]’s decision, not the judgment of the circuit court.” Prescott v. Mo.

Delmar Investment Co. v. Lewis

180 Mo. App. 22 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1913

Our Supreme Court in Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co., 224 Mo. 369 , 123 S. … Noticing a decision by the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Rackliff v. Peters, 136 Mo. App. 168 , 115 S.

State v. Achter

514 S.W.2d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1974

Renard, 273 S.W. 1058 (Mo.1925); State v. Brown, 306 Mo. 532 , 267 S.W. 864 (1924); State v. DeGroat, supra, 168 S.W. at 704 ; State v. Smith, 233 Mo. 242 , 135 S.W. 465 (1911) ; State v. … In Brown , the court set forth the law as we have stated it, relying on State v. O’ Brien, supra; State v. Bockstruck, supra; State v. Price, supra; and State v.

State v. Cook

512 S.W.2d 907 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1974

State v. Browning, supra. Nor is this a case of “sudden combat, without any undue advantage being taken, and without any dangerous weapon being used.” … State v. Browning, supra. Defendant’s own testimony, however, demonstrates as a matter of law that he was committing an illegal act when the killing occurred.

State v. Kelly

506 S.W.2d 61 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1974

State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527 , 24 S.W. 1027 (1894); State v. Brownridge, 353 S.W.2d 715 (Mo.1962, first appeal); Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313 , 25 L.Ed. 667 (1879). … Swain v. Alabama, supra [See also: Brown v. State, 470 S.W.2d 543 (Mo.1971); State v. Smith, 465 S.W.2d 482 (Mo.1971); Clark v. State, 465 S.W.2d 557 (Mo.1971); State v. Davison, 457 S.W.2d 674 (Mo.1970); State v.

Better Built Homes & Mortgage Co. v. Nolte

211 Mo. App. 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1923

[See: Albert v. Order of Chosen Friends, 34 Fed. 721 ; Kingfisher B. of E. v. Kingfisher, 5 Okla. 82 ; Sweeney v. Vaughn, 94 Tenn. 534 , 29 S. W. 903 .] … This has been pointed out by this court as early as the case of McKenna v. City of St. Louis, 6 Mo. App. 320 . [See also: State ex rel. v. Gates, 190 Mo. 540 , 89 S. W. 881 .]

Bank of Washington, Appellant, vs. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Louis, and LCRA Holdings Corporation, Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2025

Reciprocal Exch. v. Missouri Emps. Mut. Ins. … Mathews v. FieldWorks, LLC, 696 S.W.3d 382, 395-96 (Mo. App. W.D. 2024); see also Hibbs v. Berger, 430 S.W.3d 296, 320-21 (Mo. App.

Campbell v. Jeffries

753 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1988

The Board further finds that the Appellant did not perform an act of neglect of the proper care of a client.” … Respondent relies upon Twiehaus v. Watkins, 730 S.W.2d 298 (Mo.App.1987) as rejecting dismissal for failure of an employee to take action based upon rumor. That case is not applicable.

State v. Blevins

581 S.W.2d 449 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1979

State v. … Spring testified that he advised Brown and Lincecum that defendant had requested an attorney. Neither Brown nor Lincecum remembered that Spring had so advised them, although neither denied that Spring did so.

Waller v. City of Macon

277 S.W.2d 886 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1955

Brown v. Town of Westport, supra [ 116 Mo. 582 , 22 S.W. 888 ], it was held that but one ordinance was necessary, and we will so hold in this case.” … Earl V.

Ohmes v. Lanzarini

720 S.W.2d 425 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1986

Peters (city), its mayor and the Board of Aldermen, § 527.010 RSMo 1978. … Joseph v. Hankinson, 312 S.W.2d 4, 8 (Mo.1958), which means the decision of the legislative body is so erroneous as to not be fairly debatable, Binger v.

State ex rel. Case v. Wilson

151 Mo. App. 723 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1910

[State v. Ebbs, 89 Mo. App. 95 ; Springfield v. Starke, 93 Mo. App. 70 .] … Keeping in view the rule declared in State v. Ebbs, and Springfield v.