Case law

Ganahl v. United Railways Co.

197 Mo. App. 495 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1917

Jones, a witness for plaintiff, stated that at the stopping place in question the distance from the ground to the running board of the car was about two and one-half feet. George V. … [Section 1828, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1909; Waechter v. Railroad, 113 Mo. App. 270 ; l. c. 278, 88 S. W. 147 ; Wade v. Douglas, 161 Mo. App. 348 , l. c. 357, 143 S. W. 830 .]

State v. Bynum

299 S.W.3d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2009

Defendant then offered testimony from Leslie Brown (“Ms. Brown”), a representative from Children’s Division, concerning the hotline report that Dr. Munimuddap-pa’s call generated. … Brown’s statements.

Jones Lumber Co. v. Snyder

221 Mo. App. 1227 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1927

[Rall Bros. v. McCrary, supra; Ranson v. Sheehan, 78 Mo. 668, 674, 675 ; Lumber Co. v. Clark, 82 Mo. App. 225, 233, 234 ; Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co. v. Clark, 172 Mo. 588, 597, 598 ; Cornice & Roofing Co. v. … [May v. Mode et al., 142 Mo. App. 656, 671 .] But, as stated in the case of Engineering Co. v. Baker, 134 Mo.

Adkins v. Hazelwood School District

743 S.W.2d 869 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1987

This process was aptly outlined by this court in Iven v. … Likewise, in Hanlon v.

Moody v. Hicks

956 S.W.2d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1997

State v. Payne, 660 S.W.2d 24, 25 (Mo.App.E.D.1983); State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665, 671 (Mo.bane 1987). … Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 56 (Mo.banc 1993). Point denied. V.Other Points Relied On We summarily deny plaintiffs three remaining points.

JANET DAILEY, CLINT SMITH, SHARON K. JOBE and DONALD W. INGRAM, CO-TRUSTEES of the WILLIAM and JANET DAILEY TRUST, Relators/Petitioners-Respondents v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT of the CITY OF BRANSON, MISSOURI, and the CITY OF BRANSON, MISSOURI, Defendants/Respondents-Appellants.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 2014

"Only where the board exceeds its authority should the reviewing court hold the board's ruling to be illegal and void." Baumer v. City of Jennings, 247 S.W.3d 105, 111 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). … See White v.

American Federation of School Administrators, AFL-CIO, Local 44 v. St. Louis Public Schools St. Louis

666 S.W.2d 873 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1984

We recognize that a school board regulation cannot give employees rights they do not have by statute. Hudson v. Marshall, 549 S.W.2d 147, 152-153 (Mo. App.1977). … Hudson, 549 S.W.2d at 151 -152 citing DePoortere v. Commercial Credit Corp., 500 S.W.2d 724, 727 (Mo.App.1973).

State v. Flowers

630 S.W.2d 585 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

State v. Simpson, 614 S.W.2d 31, 33 [3] (Mo.App.1981); State v. Clark, 607 S.W.2d 817, *587 821 [5] (Mo.App.1980); State v. Brown, 607 S.W.2d 881, 886 [8] (Mo.App.1980). … Thus, under Brown , the use of MAI-CR2d 2.12 may have been inappropriate.

State v. Henke

820 S.W.2d 94 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1991

Henke argues that the board did not send statutory jury summons and qualification forms to all jury venire candidates, the board members improperly disqualified certain venire candidates, and the board did not inform disqualified … State v. Gresham, 637 S.W.2d 20, 26 (Mo. banc 1982) (quoting State v. McGoldrick, 361 Mo. 737 , 236 S.W.2d 306 (1951)).

State v. Eddington

829 S.W.2d 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1992

State v. Simms, 602 S.W.2d 760, 761 (Mo.App., W.D.1980). Appellant’s own testimony reveals the lack of such a situation. With respect to William Murphy, Mr. Brown provided even less help. Mr. … See State v. Vincent, 755 S.W.2d 400, 403 (Mo.App., E.D.1988). Where six blacks remained on the jury, this court clearly would have held no equal protection violation occurred. State v.

Eliot v. Merchants' Exchange

14 Mo. App. 234 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1883

The learned judge then cites Hyde v. Woods (supra), as directly in point, and says that if In re Sutherland (supra), can not be distinguished from Hyde v. … The next cases to be considered, in chronological order, are Thompson v. Adams, and Pancoast v.

City of Jennings v. Division of Employment Security

943 S.W.2d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1997

The City’s second argument is that the police board’s findings of fact are conclusive on the issue of misconduct. It argues the Commission must defer to the police board. It relies on Howard v. … Keener v. Wilcox, 884 S.W.2d at 746 . That deference by an appellate court has no application here. The Commission has no appellate relationship with the police board.

State v. Koonse

123 Mo. App. 655 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1907

Willie Brown is an orphan, who was twelve years old at the time of the commission of the first offense charged. … [State v. Boyer, supra; State v. Cox, 43 Mo. App. 328 .]

Bazzell v. Bazzell

907 S.W.2d 328 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1995

In Brown v. Brown, 537 S.W.2d 434 (Mo.App.1976), we recognized that when a modification is made prospective, after a lengthy delay under submission, the effective date of the decree should be the date of hearing. … We find the circumstances in this appeal virtually identical to those in Brown . Mother’s motion to modify was heard on January 7,1994.

Schueler v. City of Kirkwood

191 Mo. App. 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1915

[See Whitworth v. Webb City, 204 Mo. 579 , 103 S. … [See Walker v. St. Louis, 15 Mo. 563 ; Christy’s Adm’r v. St. Louis, 20 Mo. 143 ; State ex rel. v. Powell, 44 Mo. 436 ; Robins v. Latham, 134 Mo. 466 , 36 S. W. 33 .]

Scott v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.

196 S.W.3d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 2006

Brown v. Mercantile Bank, 820 S.W.2d 327, 336 (Mo.App.1991). “It is well established at common law that there can be an estate by the entirety in a bank account.” Id. … Brown, 820 S.W.2d at 337 . “A CD is a contract ... generally created and terminated according to the terms of the CD.” Capitol Sav. Bank, FSB v. Snelson, 998 S.W.2d 862, 866 (Mo.App.1999).

Ireland v. Spickard

95 Mo. App. 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1902

Callahan v. Riggins, 43 Mo. App. 130 ; Stanton v. Ryan, 41 Mo. 510 ; McGlothlin v. Hemry, 59 Mo. 213 ; Martin v. Jones, 59 Mo. 187 ; Wade v. Hardy, 75 Mo. 394 ; Banking House v. Rood, 132 Mo. loc. cit. 263; Eyermann v. … V.

Continental Bank Supply Co. v. International Brotherhood of Bookbinders

239 Mo. App. 1247 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1947

The purported award was later approved by the National War Labor Board. … In Hamlin v.

Murray v. City of St. Louis

947 S.W.2d 74 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1997

Asotsky v. … See also Heinkel v.

Herbert Morrison v. Karen Goodwin, City Clerk for the City of Florissant, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2023

Board (the “Board”). Section 125.270 allowed individuals to file complaints concerning police officer misconduct. … for the Env’t v. Joint Comm. on Admin. Rules, 519 S.W.3d 805, 810 (Mo. banc 2017). Here, 6 Morrison requests that Clerk Goodwin forward his complaints to the Board.