Case law

Camden v. Dodds Truck Line, Inc.

404 S.W.2d 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1966

contends that Camden’s theory of recovery as to the amount B & M owed creditors was based on his claimed trusteeship for the benefit of creditors and that Camden may not do this without joining the other members of the board … See Clark Estate Co. v. Gentry, 362 Mo. 80 , 240 S.W.2d 124 , l.c. 127(2); Bruun v. Katz Drug Co., 351 Mo. 731 , 173 S.W.2d 906 , l.c. 907, 910; Turner v. Browne, 351 Mo. 541 , 173 S.W.2d 868 , l.c. 875(13); Watkins v.

Jones v. Western Missouri Mental Health Center

878 S.W.2d 84 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1994

Our review is directed at the Board’s decision regarding its lack of jurisdiction rather than the Circuit Court’s decision. See Lebedun v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-10 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). However, Jones was not fired: he was reinstated in his former position after a promotion.

Tuller v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

241 Mo. App. 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1950

As stated by our Supreme Court in Mershon v. … Walker v. Pickwick Hotel, 211 S.W. (2nd) 55 .

Kansas Ass'n of Private Investigators v. Mulvihill

159 S.W.3d 857 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2005

Suhr v. Okorn, 131 S.W.3d 886, 891 (Mo.App. W.D.2004). … See Powell v.

American Oil Co. v. Pierce

472 S.W.2d 458 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1971

She estimated that the cost of engaging a woman to live with her would be from $125.00 to $150.00 per month and the cost of her board. … .; Wood v. Wagner Electric Corporation, 355 Mo. 670 , 197 S.W.2d 647, 649 [1-5]. We are authorized to set aside *461 such an award only when it is clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Brown v.

Moseley v. Grundy County District R-V School

319 S.W.3d 510 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2010

Boyd v. Boyd, 134 S.W.3d 820, 823-824 (Mo.App. W.D.2004). … ) will have to have in hand prior to the Board meeting.

Dempsey v. Boys' Club of the City of St. Louis, Inc.

558 S.W.2d 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1977

Cavender, 378 S.W.2d 537 [1] (Mo.1964); Crampton v. Osborn, 356 Mo. 125 , 201 S.W.2d 336 (1947); Bridgeforth v. Proffitt, 490 S.W.2d 416 [3] (Mo.App.1973); 30 Am.Jur.2d Evidence § 1089. … Co. v. City of New York, 50 A.D.2d 265 , 377 N.Y.S.2d 20, 28 (1975). . Maher v. City of New Orleans, supra, 516 F.2d 1 . c. 1065. . See First Presbyterian Church of York v.

Moody v. Hicks

956 S.W.2d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1997

State v. Payne, 660 S.W.2d 24, 25 (Mo.App.E.D.1983); State v. Amrine, 741 S.W.2d 665, 671 (Mo.bane 1987). … Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 56 (Mo.banc 1993). Point denied. V.Other Points Relied On We summarily deny plaintiffs three remaining points.

Phipps v. School District of Kansas City

645 S.W.2d 91 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1982

State Banking Board, 496 S.W.2d 17, 26 [19-26] (Mo.App.1973); Johnson v. Watkins, 298 S.W.2d 535, 538 [2,3] (Mo.App.1957)]. … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150, 157 [1-3] (Mo.App.1974).

Gardner v. Contract Freighters, Inc.

165 S.W.3d 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2005

Once or twice each year, he had to secure his load by nailing boards beside pallets to keep the pallets from sliding on the wooden floor of the trailer. … Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Co., 941 S.W.2d 31, 36 (Mo.App.1997). Arguably, the “significant precipitating factor” testimony and the “last straw” comment, standing alone, might be read as reflecting that Dr.

Shochet v. Allen

987 S.W.2d 516 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1999

(Board) in 1990 for insurance fraud. … Subsequently, the Board brought a second complaint against Client, alleging violations of the terms of the suspension.

Hilfiker v. Gideon School District 37

403 S.W.3d 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2012

Roberts v. Buckley, 533 S.W.2d 551, 553 (Mo. banc 1976). . Although it did not affect the outcome, we had indicated otherwise in Grissom v. First Nat. Ins. Agency, 364 S.W.3d 728, 739 (Mo. App.2012) and Murray v. … Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 254 n. 7, 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981). See, e.g., Carraher v.

Hays v. Estate of Miller

189 Mo. App. 72 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1915

As one person does not usually pay for the board of another and such would require a special contract, the natural inference is that a bill for board and nursing against a person is for the board and nursing of such person … The cases of Bowman v. Shelton, and Hyde v.

Rogers v. Gage

59 Mo. App. 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1894

Darling v. Wilson, 60 N. H. 59; Winter v. Landphere, 42 Iowa, 471 ; Meyers v. Cook, 85 Ala. 417 ; Funk v. Paul, 64 Wis. 35 ; Kellog v. Lovely, 46 Mich. 131 . … Sparks v. Brown, 46 Mo. App. 529 . And so we think other rulings on the admission of evidence have not materially affected the rights of the parties and offer no sufficient ground for disturbing the result.

State ex rel. Morehead v. Cartwright

122 Mo. App. 257 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1907

We readily concede that the appointment of the district clerk should have been made by the board at a regular or special meeting thereof. [Pugh v. School District No. 5, 114 Mo. App. 688 .] … [Usher v. Telegraph Co., (not yet reported).] The school board by a course of conduct extending over a period of years recognized Mr.

McCarty v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

105 Mo. App. 596 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1904

Other witnesses swore plaintiff attempted to board the car while it was moving. … Blanton v. Dold, 109 Mo. 64 ; Turner v. Hoar, 114 Mo. 335 ; Gallagher v. Illuminating Co., 72 Mo. App. 576 ; Suter v. Birchoff, 63 Mo. App. 157 ; Minister v. Railway, 53 Mo. App. 276 ; Hill v. Scott, 38 Mo.

Stone v. Kelley & Son

59 Mo. App. 214 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1894

Mort., sec. 472; Jones on Liens, sec. 691; Hauch v. Ripley, 127 Ind. 151 ; McGee v. Edwards, 87 Tenn. 506 ; Easter v. Goyne, 51 Ark. 222 ; Charles v. Neigelsen, 15 Ill. App. 17 ; Sargent v. Usher, 55 N. … H. 287; Reynolds v. Case, 60 Mich. 76 ; White v. Smith, 44 N. J. Law, 105; Ingalls *221 v. Nance, 61 Vert. 582; Small v. Robenson, 69 Maine, 425; Wright v. Shearman, 52 N. W. Rep. (S. D.) —; Chapman v. Bank, 13 S. Rep.

State Ex Rel. Sharp v. Knight

224 Mo. App. 761 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1930

[Smith v. St. Francis Co. Court, 19 Mo. 433 ; State ex rel. v. Burkhardt, 59 Mo. 75, 78 ; State ex rel. Conran v. Williams, 96 Mo. 1 , 18; State ex rel. v. Fraker, 166 Mo. 130, 142 ; State ex rel. v. Cook, 201 S. … [Cole v. Cole, supra; State ex rel. v. Slavens, 75 Mo. 508 ; Heather v. City of Palmyra, 276 S. W. 872, 875 ; State ex rel. v. Cook, supra.]

The Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention, A Missouri Non-Profit Corporation, As Representatives of the Missouri Baptist Convention, An Unincorporated Association v. Missouri Baptist University The Baptist Home

569 S.W.3d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2019

between the Convention and the Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention at length in Executive Bd. of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. … The first case is Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Missouri Baptist Foundation, 380 S.W.3d 599 (Mo.

State v. Loggins

778 S.W.2d 783 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1989

In State v. … Arthur Brown, who worked with the victim. Mr. Brown would indicate that he left work with the victim at approximately 7:00 p.m. on the evening prior to the murder. ...