Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.08s
McClelland v. Hagerty Wrecking Co.
384 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1964
Gardner v. Ford Motor Co., Mo.App., 130 S.W.2d 201 , 205; Collins v. Reed-Harlin Grocery Co., Mo.App., 230 S.W.2d 880, 891 . … Gardner v. Ford Motor Company, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublished183 Mo. App. 553 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1914
[See Hyde v. Honiter, supra; Birch v. Birch, 112 Mo. App. 157 , 86 S. W. 1106 , and authorities cited; Jarboe v. Jarboe, 106 Mo. App. 459 , 79 S. W. 1162 .] In Birch v. … The case differs materially from that of Hyde v. Honiter, Hartley v. Estate of Hartley, Kingston v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Remy v. Alexander
77 S.W.3d 628 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2002
Sander v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Creve Coeur, 60 S.W.3d 14, 15 (Mo.App.2001). … Hutchens v. St. Louis County, 848 S.W.2d 616, 617 (Mo.App.1993) (quoting Rice v. Board of Adjustment of the Village of BelRidge, 804 S.W.2d 821, 822 (Mo.App.1991)).
Cited 1 timesPublished542 S.W.2d 306 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1976
before the board of aldermen sitting as a board of impeachment. … Kendall v. Wilson, et al., 151 Mo.App. 719 , 132 S.W. 623, 624, 625 (1910).
Cited 4 timesPublished646 S.W.2d 884 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1983
State v. Brown, 611 S.W.2d 301, 302 (Mo.App.1980). By failing to request a mistrial, appellant has not preserved that contention for review. State v. Ginnery, 617 S.W.2d 117, 120 (Mo.App.1981). … State v. Meiers, 412 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.1967); State v. Brown, supra, 611 S.W.2d at 302 ; State v. Miller, 593 S.W.2d 895, 897 (Mo.App.1980).
Cited 5 timesPublishedArbuthnot v. Brookfield Loan & Building Ass'n
98 Mo. App. 382 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1903
For we have ruled in a series of cases, beginning with Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. … Brown v. Archer, supra; Moore v. Building & L. Assn., 74 Mo. App. 468 ; Barnes v. Building & L. Assn., 83 Mo. App. 466 ; Clark v. Mo. Guar. Assn., 85 Mo. App. 388 ; Pry v. Savings Assn., 88 Mo. App. 289 ; Cover v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKramer v. Park-Et Restaurant, Inc.
226 S.W.3d 867 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2007
Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 146 (Mo.App. W.D. 2007); Hicks v. Division of Employment Security, 41 S.W.3d 638, 640 (Mo.App. S.D. 2001). … Id.; Brown, 211 S.W.3d at 147 ; Bishop, 209 S.W.3d at 48 ; Thornton, 161 S.W.3d at 920 .
Cited 20 timesPublishedBrooke Buddemeyer v. Trevor Foley, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections
Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2024
See e.g., Edger v. Missouri Bd. Of Prob. & Parole, 307 S.W.3d 718, 721 (Mo. App. 2010); Cooper v. Holden, 189 S.W.3d 614, 617-618 (Mo. App. 2006); Johnson v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 92 S.W.3d 107, 113-114 (Mo. … App. 2002); Elliot v. Carnahan, 916, S.W.2d 239, 241 (Mo. App. 1995).
Cited 0 timesPublished634 S.W.2d 203 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1982
State v. Cooper, 358 Mo. 269 , 214 *204 S.W.2d 19 [1-3] (1948). … See also State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished504 S.W.2d 269 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1973
Among cases so holding are Harwood v. State ex rel. Pillars, 184 Tenn. 515 , 201 S.W.2d 672 (1947); Sonnenberg v. Markley, 289 F.2d 126 (C.A.7, 1961); Suarez v. Wilkinson, 133 F.Supp. 38 (D.C.Penn., 1955); Arkadiele v. … What was said in Commonwealth v.
Cited 5 timesPublished765 S.W.2d 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1988
State v. West, 559 S.W.2d 282, 285 (Mo.App.1977). … See State v. Hall, 687 S.W.2d 924, 927 (Mo.App.1985). In addition, the brown plastic container found in defendant’s bedroom was almost identical to the one found in defendant’s automobile.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJones v. Western Missouri Mental Health Center
878 S.W.2d 84 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1994
Our review is directed at the Board’s decision regarding its lack of jurisdiction rather than the Circuit Court’s decision. See Lebedun v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-10 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). However, Jones was not fired: he was reinstated in his former position after a promotion.
Cited 2 timesPublished416 S.W.2d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1967
Defendant cites Cunningham v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 276 S.W.2d 633 . That case was a review by certiorari to the circuit court from an order and award of the St. Louis Board of Adjustment (zoning). The board appealed. … Division of Employment Security v. Industrial Commission, Mo.App., 242 S.W.2d 593, 597 . In State ex rel. Bruno v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSoos v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co.
19 S.W.3d 683 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2000
In contrast, in Seyler v. Spirtas Indus., 974 S.W.2d 536 (Mo.App.1998) and Hannick v. … The Commission then discussed Brown v. Douglas Candy Co., 277 S.W.2d 657 (Mo.App.1955), in which an employee fell at work and experienced a severe pain in her back, which continued for several months.
Cited 14 timesPublished86 Mo. App. 346 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1900
Brown v. Gay, 76 Texas 444 ; Telegraph Co. v. Jewett, 115 N. Y. 166 ; Bond v. State, 68. Miss. 648; Fordyce v. DuBose, 87 Texas 78 ; Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Railway, 7 Fed. Rep. 537. In Ryan v. … Ry. v. Johnson, 76 Texas 421 ; Boggs v. Brown, 82 Texas 41 ; Texas Pac. Ry. v. Comstock, 83 Texas 537 .
Cited 1 timesPublished136 Mo. App. 421 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1909
Schmidt, 202 Mo. 703, 721-725 , and Swift v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. 80, 95 , and of Schoenberg v. Field, 95 Mo. App. 241 , as well as of the Supreme Courts of other States. … We are cited by plaintiff to the decision in Construction Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished487 S.W.3d 519 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2016
Callahan v. … J.D.W. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished417 S.W.2d 505 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1967
That the first board of Directors of the said Gravois-Nagel Investment Co. are as follows: Alfred Von Talge, Clara Rivituso, Betty Duke and V. Gladys Birmes. “5. … Murphy v. Burney, 269 Mo. 602 , 191 S.W. 981 ; The State ex rel. Heimburger v. Wells, 210 Mo. 601 , 109 S.W. 758 . The last contention raised is that the Board’s action was “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable.”
Cited 1 timesPublished199 Mo. App. 5 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1918
[Finer v. Nichols, 172 Mo. App. l. c. 536.] … [Finer v. Nichols, supra, l. c. 538.] "We think that plaintiff’s instruction No. 1 is erroneous for the reason that it casts a burden upon the landlord which she was not required to assume.
Cited 9 timesPublished744 S.W.2d 542 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1988
Browning-Ferris Ind. of Kansas City v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801, 811 (Mo.App.1914). … V.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna