Case law

Armstrong v. School District No. 3

28 Mo. App. 169 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1887

It was taken and kept by the clerk of the board, as of papers on file by the board. This made out a prima-facie case, and entitled the plaintiff to introduce it in evidence. Rev. Stat., sect. 7046; Crane v. … In Crane v.

Valdez v. MVM SECURITY, INC.

349 S.W.3d 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2011

In support of its position, the Division cites as authority Board of Education, 633 S.W.2d 126 , and O’Neal v. … The Board of Education appealed.

Keeton v. Sloan's Moving and Storage Company

282 S.W.2d 194 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1955

in the Brown case. … The law as to the liability of a warehouseman has been fully .set out in Brown v. Sloan’s Moving & Storage Co., Mo.Sup., 274 S.W.2d 310 ; Gutknecht v. Wagner Bros.

La Tour v. Green Foundry Co.

230 Mo. App. 1063 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1936

[Brown v. Corn Products Co., supra.] . . . … [Brown v. Corn Products Refining Co., supra. . . .]

In re the Marriage of Matthew Witt and Elizabeth Witt MATTHEW WITT, Petitioner-Respondent v. ELIZABETH WITT

487 S.W.3d 519 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2016

Callahan v. … J.D.W. v.

McCoy v. Spelman Memorial Hospital

845 S.W.2d 727 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1993

He relies heavily on Geisinger v. … See e.g., Triggs v. Risinger, 772 S.W.2d 381 (Mo.App.1989); Alexander v. Johnson Furnace Co., 543 S.W.2d 539 (Mo.App.1976).

State ex rel. School Dist. No. 4 v. School District No. 3

163 Mo. App. 253 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1912

Louis Court of Appeals, in State ex rel. v. Denny, 94 Mo. App. 559, 566 , determines the case against the validity of the proceedings. … We have been cited to the cases of State ex rel. v. Andrae, 216 Mo. 617 , and State ex rel. v.

Capital Bank v. Barnes

277 S.W.3d 781 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2009

Petrol Properties, Inc. v. Stewart Title Co., 225 S.W.3d 448, 453 (Mo.App. S.D.2007). A tenancy by the entirety means that a “husband and wife hold property as one person.” Brown v. … Brown, 820 S.W.2d at 336 . A tenancy by the entirety can be severed by consent, agreement or acquiescence. Langworthy v. Preston, 975 S.W.2d 249, 252 (Mo.App. W.D.1998).

State ex rel. Hicks v. Village of Bel-Ridge

669 S.W.2d 251 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1984

The nonrestrictive language of this statute permits an employee to be discharged at will by the board of trustees. Goodner v. Ford, 600 S.W.2d 681, 682 (Mo.App.1980); Karzin v. … Christy v. Petrus, 365 Mo. 1187 , 295 S.W.2d 122, 124 (banc 1956); Karzin v. Collett, 562 S.W.2d at 400 .

Suburban Bank of Kansas City v. Proposed Jackson County State Bank of Kansas City

326 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1959

Burger v. Boardman, 254 Mo. 238 , 162 S.W. 197 ; Jennemann v. Bucher, 186 Mo.App. 179 , 171 S.W. 613 ; Bradbury v. Donnell, 136 Mo.App. 676 , 119 S.W. 21 ; Prudot v. Stevens, Mo.App., 266 S.W.2d 756 . … Burns v. Stanton, 311 S.W.2d 137 , an opinion by this court.

Hanly v. Street

169 Mo. App. 593 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1913

Plaintiff informed defendant immediately he learned of Brown’s refusal to recognize him, and defendant insisted that Brown had given him authority to rent the building and thqt he, plaintiff, should not allow Brown to interfere … [Long v. Wheeler, 84 Mo. App. 101 .] Tbe judgment was for tbe right party and is affirmed. All concur.

Laws v. Secretary of State

895 S.W.2d 43 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1995

Byrd v. Board of Curators of Lincoln Univ., 863 S.W.2d 873, 875 (Mo. banc 1993) (colleges and universities are “agencies” under section 536.010(1)). … Byrd v. Board of Curators of Lincoln Univ., 863 S.W.2d 873, 875 (Mo. banc 1993). 3 . See Mo.

State of Missouri v. Oscar Garner

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2023

State v. Taylor, 298 S.W.3d 482, 502 (Mo. banc 2009). … (quoting State v. Davidson, 242 S.W.3d 409, 418 (Mo. App. E.D. 2007)); see also State v. Reichert, 854 S.W.2d 584 (Mo. App.

State v. Dickerson

646 S.W.2d 884 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1983

State v. Brown, 611 S.W.2d 301, 302 (Mo.App.1980). By failing to request a mistrial, appellant has not preserved that contention for review. State v. Ginnery, 617 S.W.2d 117, 120 (Mo.App.1981). … State v. Meiers, 412 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.1967); State v. Brown, supra, 611 S.W.2d at 302 ; State v. Miller, 593 S.W.2d 895, 897 (Mo.App.1980).

Sharaga v. Auto Owners Mutual Insurance Co.

831 S.W.2d 248 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1992

In Point V, Auto Owners argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony on the source of the fire given by a fire fighter, Charles Brown, who participated in fighting the fire. … Brown’s identity and role in the event soon after the fire and long before the trial. Turner v. Fuqua Homes, Inc., 742 S.W.2d 603, 611 (Mo.App.1987). Finally, Mr.

Builders Material & Supply Co. v. J. B. Evans Construction Co.

204 Mo. App. 76 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1920

Louis Lumber Co. v. Banks et al., 136 Mo. App. 44 , 117 S. W. 611 ; School District ex rel. v. Beggs, 147 Mo. App. 177 , 126 S. W. 530 ; Board of Education of St. Louis ex rel. v. … It was for the School Board to prescribe the terms of the bond. That it did not embody all the requirements of the architects was a matter for the Board. In Electric Appliance Co. v.

Moffett-West Drug Co. v. Johnson

80 Mo. App. 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1899

McCrary v *429 Good, 74 Mo. App. 425 ; Doggett v. Blanke, 70 Mo. App. 500 ; Brashears v. Strock, 46 Mo. 221 ; Swartz v. Nicholson, 65 Mo. 508 ; Weese v. Brown, 102 Mo. 299 . Reversed. All concur.

State v. Evans

820 S.W.2d 545 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1991

BROWN [defense counsel]: Objection. MR. SIEGEL [prosecutor]: I wouldn’t try this case. MS. BROWN: Objection, Your Honor. May we approach the bench, please. … State v. Beck, 745 S.W.2d 205, 209 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1987) citing State v. Allen, 363 Mo. 467 , 251 S.W.2d 659, 662 (1952).

Heidrich v. City of Lee's Summit

916 S.W.2d 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1996

See, e.g., Greene County Concerned Citizens v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 873 S.W.2d 246, 256 (Mo.App. 1994). As explained in Hoffman v. … Van Petten still interprets the ordinance to require future Board approval of Phases IV and V. In other words, the parties and the Board treated the Phases as severable.

State v. Hickerson

66 S.W.3d 787 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2002

State v. Brown, 974 S.W.2d 630, 632 (Mo.App. S.D.1998). In this case Appellant’s sentencing was postponed eleven months because of his escape. … In State v. Brown, the appeal was dismissed after the defendant escaped from jail and was absent for more than two months. 974 S.W.2d at 631, 633 .