Case law

Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. Peters

384 S.W.3d 279 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2012

Because the Appellants have not established that the Board’s action was clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, we will not substitute our opinion for that of the Board. Riggins v. … Point V is denied.

United Brick & Tile Division of American-Marietta Co. v. Wilkinson

325 S.W.2d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1959

In Guss v. … On page 801 of 287 S.W.2d of the opinion the phrase “primary jurisdiction” as delegated to the Board was construed under the Garner and Weber v.

Weisbrod v. McGauley

629 S.W.2d 413 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

City of Columbia v. Mo. State Bd. of Mediation, 605 S.W.2d 192, 194 (Mo.App.1980). … Chapman v. Sanders, 528 S.W.2d 462, 465 (Mo.App.1975). The only evidence offered by Weisbrod concerning causation was a report by Dr. Milster. Dr.

Bank of Kirksville v. Sloop

198 Mo. App. 225 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1917

[Bank v. Lyons, 220 Mo. 538, 554 ; Bank v. Bank, 244 Mo. 554, 580, 599 ; Hume v. Eagon, 83 Mo. App. 576 ; Van Standt v. Hobbs, 84 Mo. App. 628, 632 ; Powers v. Woolfolk, 132 Mo. App. 354, 363 ; Miles v. Bank, 187 Mo. … [See opinion of Bond, J., in Hume v. Eagon, supra, p. 583 , and Musgrove v. Bank, supra, p. 492; *228 Long v. Long, 167 Mo. App. 83 .] The case cited by plaintiff (Cantrell v. Davidson, 180 Mo.

State v. Turner

713 S.W.2d 877 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1986

Defendant relies primarily on State v. … State v. Jones, 583 S.W.2d 212, 215 (Mo.App.1979) (citing State v. Campbell, 533 S.W.2d 671, 675 (Mo.App.1976)).

Vollrath v. Stevens

199 Mo. App. 5 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1918

[Finer v. Nichols, 172 Mo. App. l. c. 536.] … [Finer v. Nichols, supra, l. c. 538.] "We think that plaintiff’s instruction No. 1 is erroneous for the reason that it casts a burden upon the landlord which she was not required to assume.

Whaley v. Hinchman

22 Mo. App. 483 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1886

Trevor v. Wood, 36 N. Y. 807 ; Duble v. Batts, 38 Texas, 312 ; Wells v. Ry. Co., 30 Wis. 605 . … We feel justified in going somewhat beyond the rule stated in King v.

Ehler v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

254 S.W.3d 99 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2008

Halford v. Mo. State High *101 way Patrol, 909 S.W.2d 362, 364 (Mo.App. W.D.1995). If the findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record, then the decision must be affirmed. Id. … Even if the captain voted in this case, it was a harmless error because the decision of the Board was unanimous. In Medley v.

Jewell Pure Water Co. v. Kansas City Towel & Laundry Co.

74 Mo. App. 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1898

, to convey the same to Brown. … Clarkson v. Mullin, 62 Mo. App. 622 ; Parker v. Roberts, 116 Mo. 657 .

In re the Marriage of Kelly

769 S.W.2d 466 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1989

See Markowski v. Markowski, 736 S.W.2d 463, 466 (Mo.App.1987) (wife’s failure to seek suitable employment supported decision to terminate maintenance). Even had Mrs. … Brown v. Brown, 537 S.W.2d 434, 437-38 (Mo.App.1976), held that the effective date of the modification order is a matter within the sound discretion of the hearing court.

New Birdsall Co. v. Keys

99 Mo. App. 458 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1903

Brown v. Weldon, 27 Mo. App. 1 . c. 268; Comings v. Leedy, 114 Mo. 478 ; Brewing Co. v. McEnroe, 80 Mo. App. 429 , and cases cited. … Brown v. Welden, 27 Mo. App. 251 ; s. c., 99 Mo. 564 ; Brewing Co. v. McEnroe, 80 Mo. App. 429 ; Werner v. O’Brien, 40 Mo. App. 483 .

Kearns v. City of Florissant

393 S.W.2d 841 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1965

Prichard v. Ward, Mo.App., 305 S.W.2d 900, 1 . c. 902 [4-7]. … In Donovan v.

City of Jennings v. Division of Employment Security

943 S.W.2d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1997

The City’s second argument is that the police board’s findings of fact are conclusive on the issue of misconduct. It argues the Commission must defer to the police board. It relies on Howard v. … Keener v. Wilcox, 884 S.W.2d at 746 . That deference by an appellate court has no application here. The Commission has no appellate relationship with the police board.

Properties v. State Tax Commission

742 S.W.2d 242 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1987

Affiliated Medical Transport, Inc. v. State Tax Commission, 741 S.W.2d 25 (Mo. banc 1987). Our Supreme Court has previously addressed plaintiff’s argument, implicitly, if not directly. In May Department Stores Co. v. … Homes v. State Tax Commission, 669 S.W.2d 548 (Mo. banc 1984), and thus plaintiff was not prejudiced by the alleged improper motives of the Board members. Judgment affirmed. KELLY and CRIST, JJ., concur. .

State ex rel. White v. Goodfellow

1 Mo. App. 495 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1876

Bridgeport v. R. R. Co. 15 Conn. 475 . An act. of the Legislature investing the County Court with power to do certain acts necessarily implies the right to use fit and appropriate means. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. … Co. v. Marion County, 36 Mo. 294 . We are of the opinion that the-board of water-works of the city of St.

Byington v. School District of Joplin

224 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1930

[Frazier v. School District, 24 Mo. App. 250 , l. c. 254.] … [Willis v. Reed, 190 S. W. 277 ; Fitz Williams v. North Western Trust Co., 10 S. W. (2d) 334 ; Hecker v. Bleish, 3 S. W. (2d) 1008 , 319 Mo. 149 ; Lee v. Conran, 213 Mo. 404, 415 , 111 S. W. 1151 .]

Merchants' National Bank v. Sells

3 Mo. App. 85 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1876

The case of Pasley v. … And in Lord v.

State ex rel. St. Louis Regional Health Care Corp. v. Wamser

735 S.W.2d 741 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1987

V and VI. … Klayman v. Baine, 622 S.W.2d 757 (Mo.App.1981). The Election Board lacked the authority to certify the proposition to the Board of Aldermen and prohibition was the proper remedy to prevent its doing so.

State ex rel. Clark v. Osborne

24 Mo. App. 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1887

Jefferson City School Board, 71 Mo. 628 ; Morrow v. Wood, 35 Wis. 59 ; Trustees, etc., v. VanAllen, 87 Ill. 303 . … Deskins v. Gose, 85 Mo. 485 .

American Federation of School Administrators, AFL-CIO, Local 44 v. St. Louis Public Schools St. Louis

666 S.W.2d 873 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1984

We recognize that a school board regulation cannot give employees rights they do not have by statute. Hudson v. Marshall, 549 S.W.2d 147, 152-153 (Mo. App.1977). … Hudson, 549 S.W.2d at 151 -152 citing DePoortere v. Commercial Credit Corp., 500 S.W.2d 724, 727 (Mo.App.1973).