Case law

Armstrong v. School District No. 3

28 Mo. App. 169 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1887

It was taken and kept by the clerk of the board, as of papers on file by the board. This made out a prima-facie case, and entitled the plaintiff to introduce it in evidence. Rev. Stat., sect. 7046; Crane v. … In Crane v.

Mprove v. KLT Telecom, Inc.

135 S.W.3d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2004

W.D.1994) (quoting Brown v. McIBS, Inc., Ill S.W.2d 337, 341 (Mo.App. E.D.1986)). … Brown, 111 S.W.2d at 341.

Barchers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

669 S.W.2d 235 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1984

Ramacciotti v. Zinn, 550 S.W.2d 217, 224 (Mo.App.1977). The National Railroad Adjustment Board is just such a body. Mock v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, 454 F.2d 131, 134-35 (8th Cir.1972). … Public Law Boards were established by the same act, and have the same duties, as the National Board. Their decisions are subject to the same narrow scope of review. 45 U.S.C. § 153 .

State v. Tull

42 Mo. App. 324 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1890

Law, sec. 415; State v. Evers, 49 Mo. 542 . A promise to do something in the future has never been considered a false pretense. 2 Bish. Crim. Law, secs. 419, 420. … Every one who boards at a hotel or boarding house directly or indirectly promises to pay his board, and yet it- would scarcely be thought such promise, though false, would subject the promisor to a criminal prosecution.

State Ex Rel. Devanssay v. McGuire

622 S.W.2d 323 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1981

Allright Missouri v. Civic Plaza Redevelopment Corp., supra. In determining the propriety of the Board’s action, we are not limited to the redevelopment plan itself. … This additional material may be considered in determining whether the action of the Board of Aldermen was arbitrary. Parking Systems, Inc. v.

State ex rel. Kugler v. Tillatson

304 S.W.2d 485 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1957

Mansur v. Morris, 355 Mo. 424 , 196 S.W.2d 287 ; State ex rel. Hagerman v. Drabelle, Mo., 191 S.W. 691 ; State ex rel. Crow v. Carothers, 204 Mo.App. 209 , 222 S.W. 1043 . … Kelleher v. Board of President and Directors of St. Louis Public Schools, 134 Mo. 296 , 35 S.W. 617 ; State ex rel. Hagerman v. Drabelle, supra.

State ex rel. St. Louis Regional Health Care Corp. v. Wamser

735 S.W.2d 741 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1987

V and VI. … Klayman v. Baine, 622 S.W.2d 757 (Mo.App.1981). The Election Board lacked the authority to certify the proposition to the Board of Aldermen and prohibition was the proper remedy to prevent its doing so.

Johnson v. City of Buckner

610 S.W.2d 406 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1980

The court stated at p. 712: Subsequent lower court decisions have interpreted the guidelines articulated in Roth [Board of Regents v. … In Buhr v.

Clanton v. Teledyne Neosho

960 S.W.2d 532 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1998

Doe Run Co. v. Brown, 918 S.W.2d 303, 306 (Mo.App.1996)(citing Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Exp., 819 S.W.2d 338, 340 (Mo. banc 1991)). … Brown, 918 S.W.2d at 306 .

Brinkmann v. Common School Dist. No. 27

238 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1951

Dye v. School District No. 32, supra. … See also Cantrell *6 v.

State ex rel. Clark v. Osborne

24 Mo. App. 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1887

Jefferson City School Board, 71 Mo. 628 ; Morrow v. Wood, 35 Wis. 59 ; Trustees, etc., v. VanAllen, 87 Ill. 303 . … Deskins v. Gose, 85 Mo. 485 .

Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Pall, Inc.

817 S.W.2d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1991

See American Family Mutual Ins. v. Brown, 657 S.W.2d 273 (Mo.App.1983). The trial court properly granted summary judgment against Farm Bureau. II. … See Riss International Corp. v. Sullivan Lines Inc., 684 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.App.1984); Lowery v. Tucson Diesel Inc., 17 Ariz.App. 348 , 498 P.2d 160 (1972); Miller v.

Sides v. Contemporary Homes, Inc.

311 S.W.2d 117 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1958

Defendant claims error in submitting the case to the jury because there was no evidence of a definite acceptance of plaintiff’s offer, citing Brown v. Childers, Mo.App., 254 S.W.2d 275 , and Shofler v. … Beeler v. Board of Adjustment of City of Joplin, Mo.App., 298 S.W.2d 481 (2).

State v. Russ

642 S.W.2d 706 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1982

State v. Chapman, 627 S.W.2d 597, 598 (Mo.1982); State v. Moore, 580 S.W.2d 747, 749 (Mo. banc 1979). … Sours v.

State ex rel. School Dist. No. 4 v. School District No. 3

163 Mo. App. 253 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1912

Louis Court of Appeals, in State ex rel. v. Denny, 94 Mo. App. 559, 566 , determines the case against the validity of the proceedings. … We have been cited to the cases of State ex rel. v. Andrae, 216 Mo. 617 , and State ex rel. v.

Reyes v. St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

716 S.W.2d 294 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1986

Liberty Loan Corporation of Antioch v. Brown, 493 S.W.2d 664, 666 (Mo.App.1973); Mohesky v. City of Washington, 432 S.W.2d 364, 366 (Mo.App.1968). … Id; see also Liberty Loan Corporation of Antioch v. Brown, supra, 493 S.W.2d at 666 . Here, the trial court’s sole ground for granting defendant a new trial was that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

Burnett v. Barnes

546 S.W.2d 744 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1977

In addition, this court notes the citation of State v. Ozark Transmission District, 409 S.W.2d 71 (Mo. banc 1966), Purdy v. Bankers’ Life Ass’n, 101 Mo.App. 91 , 74 S.W. 486 (1903); Westlake Hospital Ass’n v. … Blix, 13 Ill.2d 183 , 148 N.E.2d 471 (1958); Schrick v. St. Louis Mutual House Bldg. Co., 34 Mo. 423 (1864); State ex rel. Schrempp v. Grand Lodge A. O. U.

Wild v. Western Union Building & Loan Ass'n

60 Mo. App. 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 1895

Browne on Parol Evidence, page 13.■ Nor does the rule apply “when papers or documents are introduced collaterally in the trial of a cause” (Browne on Parol Evidence, page 18; Faulcon v. Johnston, 102 N. … But, under the rule stated in Duncan v.

Bowers v. Bowers

225 Mo. App. 1197 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1931

Dawson v. St. … Other cases cited by defendant are State v. Superior Court (Wash.), 148 Pac. 882 , L. R. A. 1915E. 567; Peel v. Peel, 50 Ia. 521 ; Latham v Latham, 2 Swab & T. 299; Mangels v. Mangels, 6 Mo. App. 481 .

State ex rel. Hicks v. Village of Bel-Ridge

669 S.W.2d 251 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1984

The nonrestrictive language of this statute permits an employee to be discharged at will by the board of trustees. Goodner v. Ford, 600 S.W.2d 681, 682 (Mo.App.1980); Karzin v. … Christy v. Petrus, 365 Mo. 1187 , 295 S.W.2d 122, 124 (banc 1956); Karzin v. Collett, 562 S.W.2d at 400 .