Case law

Maryland Plaza Redevelopment Corp. v. Greenberg

594 S.W.2d 284 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1979

Boswell v. Brinckmann, 579 S.W.2d 781 (Mo.App.1979); McHenry v. Claspill, 545 S.W.2d 690 (Mo.App.1976). … Morton v.

Homa v. Carthage R-IX School District

345 S.W.3d 266 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 2011

’s decision.’ ” Stacy v. … The Board was free to believe all, part, or none of the witnesses’ testimony. See Hanford v. City of Arnold, 49 S.W.3d 707, 710 (Mo.App. E.D.2001).

Moran v. Whaley

608 S.W.2d 446 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1980

Perez v. Webb, 533 S.W.2d 650, 654 (Mo.App.1976). We must determine if the Board’s findings and conclusions are reasonable in light of all the evidence presented. … If they are clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence, it is our duty to reverse the Board or order any further action that is appropriate. Vlasak v.

Bd. of Directors of Richland Twp. v. Kenoma, LLC

284 S.W.3d 672 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2009

While there is merit to the Township Board’s last three points, 2 the court’s first holding, which concluded that the Supreme Court of Missouri’s decision in Premium Standard Farms, Inc. v. … Savannah Place, Ltd. v. Heidelberg, 164 S.W.3d 64, 68 (Mo.App. S.D.2005).

Ballpark Lofts III, LLC v. City of St. Louis

395 S.W.3d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2013

Phillips v. Schafer, 348 S.W.3d 753 , 757 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). … Missouri Veterans Home v. Bohrer, 849 S.W.2d 77, 78 (Mo.App. W.D.1993). B.

Salmons v. State

16 S.W.3d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2000

The court first notes that in State v. Brown, 750 S.W.2d 139 (Mo.App.1988) it was held that conviction for the manufacture of marijuana and felony possession of marijuana did not constitute a double jeopardy violation. … State v. White, 14 S.W.3d 121, 126 (Mo.App.W.D.2000) citing State v. O’Brien, 5 S.W.3d 532 (Mo.App.1999). This case is analogous to State v. Brown, supra.

State ex rel. Walmar Investment Co. v. Armstrong

477 S.W.2d 730 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1972

Kassen v. Carver, Mo.App., 355 S.W.2d 324, 327 ; State ex rel. Shaw State Bank v. … Buff v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, Mo.Sup., 467 S.W.2d 273 .

City of Lake Lotawana v. Lehr

529 S.W.2d 445 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1975

Christopher v. … In Tramonti v.

Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

937 S.W.2d 300 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1996

Highfill v. Brown, 340 S.W.2d 656, 664 (Mo.1960). The trial court must not only be dissatisfied with the verdict, but there must be some compelling reason to warrant its dissatisfaction. Van Loon v. St. … The Railroad Retirement Board annuities are funded partially by the employer and partially by the employee.

Pollard v. BD. OF ED. REORG. SCH. DIST., ETC.

533 S.W.2d 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1976

533 S.W.2d 667 (1976) Vera POLLARD, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION REORGANIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. III, PLATTE COUNTY, Missouri, Respondent. No. KCD 27651. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. … Blue Springs Reorganized School District IV v. Landuyt, supra.

State v. Gibson

122 S.W.3d 121 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 2003

In State v. … In relying to some extent on Brown for our interpretation of § 577.023, we are aware of this court’s holding in State v.

Tanisha Ross-Paige v. Saint Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Steven A. Gori, Michael A. Deeba, Sr., Saint Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Richard H. Gray, Bettye Battle Turner, Thomas J. Irwin and Francis G. Slay

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

Edwards v. Gerstein, 363 S.W.3d 155, 170 (Mo.App.W.D. 2012). Even if the Board’s attack on Instruction No. 8 were preserved, the Board has failed to demonstrate reversible error. … In support of its argument, the Board cites State ex rel. Koster v. McElwain, 340 S.W.3d 221 (Mo.App.W.D. 2011)14 and Neighbors v. Wolfson, 926 S.W.2d 35 (Mo.App.E.D. 1996).

School Districts Numbered 18 v. Yates

161 Mo. App. 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1912

No. 1 v. … No. 1 v.

Hay v. Schwartz

982 S.W.2d 295 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1998

In our review, we must not substitute our judgment for that of the Board. Paulson v. Missouri Dep’t of Revenue, 961 S.W.2d 63, 65 (Mo.App.1998). … Following Knapp , in our review of the Board’s decision here, we cannot infer that the Board made a finding of incredibility as to Dr. Kling and Hay because it denied him benefits. Century State Bank v.

Heusmann v. Priest

366 S.W.2d 42 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1963

Respondent, however, cites in support of such construction of that term Buckner v. Quick Seal Inc., et al., 233 Mo. App. 273 , 118 S.W.2d 100, 111 , and Crow v. … Cheek v. Durasteel Co., Mo. App., 209 S.W.2d 548 ; Gegg v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co. et al., Mo.App., 271 S.W.2d 223 ; Lofton v. Armour & Co., Mo. App., 311 S.W.2d 350 .

McShane v. School District Number 5, Township 32, Range 18

70 Mo. App. 624 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1897

wuphciaerk.fihns The first of these objections is sufficiently answered by what is said in Saleno v. Neosho, 127 Mo. 638 , and in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gill in Globe Furniture Co. v. District No. 7, 51 Mo. … Scruggs v. Scruggs, 41 Mo. 243 ; Lincoln v. Thompson, 75 Mo. 613 .

Tipton v. Barton

747 S.W.2d 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1988

Great American Insurance Company v. … Waldron v. Ragland, 716 S.W.2d 861, 863 [3] (Mo.App.1986); Mills v. Mills, 663 S.W.2d 369, 374 [12] (Mo.App.1983).

Cathy's Kitchen & Diner, LLC v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2024

Webb v. … Brown as Tr. of George E. Heard Revocable Tr., Dated Feb. 24, 2000 v. Barnes, 641 S.W.3d 241, 247 n.3 (Mo. App. W.D. 2021).

State ex. rel. Dienoff v. Galkowski

426 S.W.3d 633 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2014

Shall the Board of Directors of the St. … Reed v.

Wyckoff v. Southern Hotel Co.

24 Mo. App. 382 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1887

Cayle’s Case, 8 Coke Rep. 32a; Threfall v. Borwick, L. R. 7 Q. B. 177; s. c. affirmed, L. R. 10 Q. B. 210; Manning v. Hollenbeck, 27 Wis. 202 ; Cook v. Prentice, (Supreme Court, Oregon, 1886) 34 Alb. L. J. 93; Jones v. … Fitch v. Newberry, 1 Doug. (Mich.) 1; Robinson v. Baker, 5 Cush. 37; Stevens v. Railroad, 3 Gray, 262 ; Clark v. Railroad, 9 Gray, 231 .