Case law

St. Louis Police Officers' Ass'n v. Sayad

685 S.W.2d 913 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1984

State Board of Registration for the *918 Healing Acts v. Giffen, 651 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. banc 1988) [2]; Labor’s Educational and Political Club-Independent v. Danforth, 561 S.W.2d 339 (Mo. banc 1977) [15]. … City of Kirkwood v.

State ex rel. Bouchard v. Grady

86 S.W.3d 121 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 2002

Board of Election Com’rs of St. Louis County v. Knipp, 784 S.W.2d 797, 798 (Mo. banc 1990). The relief the courts may grant is limited to what the statutes specifically authorize. Id.; Hockemeier v. … Hockemeier v. Berra, 641 S.W.2d 67 (Mo. banc 1982); Harter v. Kehm, 733 S.W.2d 775 (Mo.App. E.D.1987); and Winchester v. Adkisson, 522 S.W.2d 825 (Mo.App. S.D.1975).

Beckmeyer v. Beuc

367 S.W.2d 9 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1963

Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491 , certiorari denied, 344 U.S. 913 , 73 S.Ct. 336 , 97 L.Ed. 704 ; Carlyle-Lowell, Inc. v. Ennis, Mo.App., 330 S.W.2d 164 . … Carlyle-Lowell, Inc. v.. Ennis, supra. Again referring to appellants’ own citation from the McQuillin text, asset out above, this property should be viewed in the light of its environment.

In the Interest of J.B.

58 S.W.3d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2001

Parents, John and Mary Brown, of minor child J.B. … See KV Pharmaceutical Co. v.

McCarthy v. Peterson

121 S.W.3d 240 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2003

Further, chapter 138 details the procedures for real estate tax assessment review by the Board. St. Peters Hosp. v. Zimmerman, 914 S.W.2d 26, 28 (Mo.App.E.D.1995). … While the above procedures contemplate an appeal to the Board, it is not absolutely necessary to first appeal to the Board to recover for sums paid under protest. Id. In Pentecostal Church of God v.

Thomas v. Mahan

886 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1994

Neither the circuit court nor this court reviews the decision of the Board de novo. Kimble v. Worth County R-III Board of Education, 669 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Mo.App.1984). … If there was substantial and competent evidence of any one of the charges, where the authorized punishment on the proven charge is termination of employment, the Board’s decision must stand. Kell v.

State Ex Rel. Goodman v. ST. LOUIS BD. OF POLICE COMM'N

181 S.W.3d 156 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005

181 S.W.3d 156 (2005) STATE of Missouri, ex rel., Jason GOODMAN, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, Joann Freeman, Susan Rollins, Michael Quinn, Bartholomew Saracino, and Francis Slay, Respondents. … Hunter v. Lippold, 142 S.W.3d 241, 242 (Mo.App. W.D. 2004).

State v. Pilkinton

310 S.W.2d 304 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1958

Brown, 306 Mo. 532, 535 , 267 S.W. 864, 865 ; State v. Zammar, Mo., 305 S.W.2d 441, 444 . … However, defendants may be interested in reading In re Conlin, Child.Ct, 130 N.Y.S.2d 811 , in which a father’s failure to place his children in school was not excused by refusal of the Board of Education to transport them

Keesee v. Freeman

772 S.W.2d 663 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1989

An exception to that rule was recognized in Brown v. National Supermarkets, 679 S.W.2d 307 (Mo.App.1984), where a grocery store patron was beaten and shot in the store’s parking lot. … Brown v. National Super Markets, Inc., 731 S.W.2d 291 (Mo.App.1987). More recently, the supreme court had occasion to review the Brown doctrine in Decker v. Gramex Corp., 758 S.W.2d 59 (Mo. banc 1988), and Madden v.

Eubank v. Sayad

669 S.W.2d 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1984

We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings and reverse only if there is no substantial evidence in support. Macchi v. Whaley, 586 S.W.2d 70 (Mo.App.1979) [1,2]; Hanebrink v. … State v. Foster, 490 S.W.2d 659 (Mo.App.1973).

Matter of Weissinger

720 S.W.2d 430 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1986

Wallace argues that relatives still have preference over strangers absent the particular circumstances set forth in Roots v. Reid, 555 S.W.2d at 54 , relying on our recent opinion in Brown v. … The Brown case involved the appointment of a guardian of the person and a conservator of the estate of Carolyn Storz Brown, who had suffered severe brain damage.

Medley v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

776 S.W.2d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1989

Medley appealed and our court, in Medley v. … Our standard of review has been aptly set forth in Gamble v.

Leonard v. Pioneer Finance Co.

568 S.W.2d 937 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1978

Liberty Loan Corporation of Antioch v. Brown, 493 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1973). See also Zimmerman v. Associates Discount Corp., 444 S.W.2d 396 (Mo. banc 1969) and Biederman’s of Springfield, Inc. v. … Union County Board of Review v. Hotel Investment Co., 250 Iowa 59 , 92 N.W.2d 397 (1958); Anderson v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 133 La. 896 , 63 So. 395 (1913); Freeman v.

Erica Williams v. Favored, LLC and Division of Employment Security

443 S.W.3d 716 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2014

Brown. … Brown in February 2013 in order to assist Williams and other staff and satisfy ratio requirements. Ms.

DCW Enterprises, Inc. v. Terre Du Lac Ass'n

953 S.W.2d 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1997

The Association is governed by a board of directors. … Phillips v. Authorized Investors Group, 625 S.W.2d 917, 921 (Mo.App.1981). Here, sections 8(A) and 12(A) of the association’s by-laws do vest the board with broad discretion in levying assessments against the members.

State ex rel. Walmar Investment Co. v. Armstrong

477 S.W.2d 730 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1972

Kassen v. Carver, Mo.App., 355 S.W.2d 324, 327 ; State ex rel. Shaw State Bank v. … Buff v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, Mo.Sup., 467 S.W.2d 273 .

State v. Lee

332 S.W.3d 267 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2011

State v. Kuhlenberg, 981 S.W.2d 617, 621 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). … State v. Blom, 45 S.W.3d 519, 521 (Mo.App. W.D.2001).

Clay v. Special School District of St. Louis County

211 S.W.3d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2007

Brown v. MOCAP, Inc., 105 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). Here, the Appeals Tribunal mailed its decision to Claimant on September 12, 2006. The application for review was due thirty days later, on October 12, 2006. … Brown, 105 S.W.3d at 855 ; Truel v. Division of Employment Security, 166 S.W.3d 131, 132 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). Our only recourse is to dismiss the appeal. The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Salmons v. State

16 S.W.3d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2000

The court first notes that in State v. Brown, 750 S.W.2d 139 (Mo.App.1988) it was held that conviction for the manufacture of marijuana and felony possession of marijuana did not constitute a double jeopardy violation. … State v. White, 14 S.W.3d 121, 126 (Mo.App.W.D.2000) citing State v. O’Brien, 5 S.W.3d 532 (Mo.App.1999). This case is analogous to State v. Brown, supra.

State ex rel. King City, Missouri R-1 School District v. Ueligger

430 S.W.2d 433 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1968

The regularity of the proceedings of this Board of Arbitration has already been tested *434 in this court and found to be proper. Reorganized School District R-ll, DeKalb and Andrew Counties, Missouri v. … Consolidated School District No. 1, Mississippi and New Madrid Counties v. Jones, 320 Mo. 353 , 8 S.W.2d 66 , is directly in point.