Case law

City of Westport ex rel. Whiting v. Mastin

62 Mo. App. 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1895

Eddy, 123 Mo. 546 ; Kiley v. Oppenheimer, 55 Mo. 374 . … In Abbot v. Lindenbower, the following is quoted with approval from Dillon, J., in Allen v.

State v. Tibbs

523 S.W.2d 108 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 13, 1975

Swope v. Printz, 468 S.W.2d 34, 40 (Mo.1971). … State v. Cook, 440 S. W.2d 461 (Mo.1969). Appellant cites aggravated cases of judicial interference, such as State v. James, 321 S.W.2d 698 (Mo.1959), and State v.

Henning v. Holbrook-Blackwelder Real Estate Trust Co.

218 Mo. App. 433 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1925

[Corum v. Arnold, 156 Mo. App. 547 , 137 S.W. 622 ; Hovey Brown v. Aaron, 133 Mo. App. 573 , 113 S.W. 718 ; Reitz v. Oglebay, 213 Mo. App. 611 , l.c. 616, 251 S.W. 771 ; Dodge v. Childers, 167 Mo. … App. 620 , l.c. 625, 153 S.W. 277 ; Bassford v. West, 124 Mo. App. 248 , l.c. 257, 101 S.W. 610 ; Wright Orrison v. Brown, 68 Mo. App. 577 ; Brown Fenwick R.E. Abs. Co. v. Marks, ___ Mo. App. ___, 226 S.W. 55 .]

State of Missouri v. Sara M. Eyler

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2023

Eyler relies on State v. Brown, 457 S.W.3d 772 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014) 6 and State v. Watkins, 804 S.W.2d 859 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991). Both cases are distinguishable. … This Court reversed the conviction because “no 6 Brown was overruled on other grounds by State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). State v. Turrentine, 524 S.W.3d 55, 58 n.5 (Mo. App.

State v. Stavricos

506 S.W.2d 51 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1974

[Rule 28.18; State v. … State v.

State ex rel. Sweaney v. Gentry

112 Mo. App. 589 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1905

Sweaney, claiming to act for the old board, not to pay any funds in his hands as aforesaid on any warrant issued by the new board of directors, nor to pay any of said funds to the new board of the village district. … [State ex rel. v. St. Louis Circuit Court, 1 Mo. App. 543 ; State ex rel. v. Thayer, 10 Mo. App. 540 ; Gamble v. Gibson, 10 Mo. App. 329 ; Hurck v. Erskine, 45 Mo. 484 ; State ex rel. v. Oliver, 116 Mo. 188 .]

State v. Hall

829 S.W.2d 29 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1992

Officer Cole found a red canvas bag on the rear floor board of the car, opened the bag and took the .357 magnum out of it. … Rule 29.15(j); State v. White, 798 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Mo. banc 1990); Brown v. State, 785 S.W.2d 759, 761 (Mo.App.1990). Judgments affirmed. SMITH, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER, C.J., concur.

State ex rel. Goodnow v. Police Commissioners

80 Mo. App. 206 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1899

for cause, after a hearing by the board, and said board is hereby invested with exclusive jurisdiction in such matters. … State ex rel. v. Field, 99 Mo. 352 ; Kansas City v.

Steiger v. City of Ste. Genevieve

235 Mo. App. 579 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1940

[State ex rel. v. Trimble, 309 Mo. 546 , 274 S.W. 683 ; City of New Franklin v. Edwards (Mo. App.), 23 S.W.2d 235 .] … Not only does a board of aldermen or municipal council have the inherent power to amend or correct its records to make them speak the truth (State v.

Suburban Bank of Kansas City v. Jackson County State Bank

330 S.W.2d 183 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1959

Wall v. Fenner, 1956, 76 S.D. 252 , 76 N.W.2d 722, 726 . Similarly, the Supreme Court of Michigan in Moran v. … Dybdal v. State Securities Commission, 145 Minn. 221 , 176 N.W. 759 .

State v. Simpson

614 S.W.2d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1981

Notes on Use 3, MAI-CR2d 2.10; State v. Brown, 607 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.App.1980). … State v. Clark, 607 S.W.2d 817 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Brown, supra. The judgment is affirmed. All concur. 1 . The sentences were ordered to be served consecutive to a prior 10-year sentence.

Ruppel v. City of Valley Park

318 S.W.3d 179 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 2010

Todd v. Missouri United School Ins. Council, 223 S.W.3d 156, 160 (Mo. banc 2007); ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). … Risher v. Farmers Ins., 200 S.W.3d 84, 88 (Mo.App. E.D.2006).

State v. Mitchell

558 S.W.2d 383 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1977

Gray was assisted by Nathaniel Holsey, age ten, who resides in a neighborhood near the Brown Shoe Company and who worked for Gray when the latter brought his food service operation to the Brown Shoe location. … In State v.

Coates v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

525 S.W.2d 654 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1975

See Webb v. Rencb, 476 S.W.2d 570 (Mo.App.1972) and Bickel v. American Trust Life Ins. Co., 468 S.W.2d 873 (Tex.Civ.App.1971). … Furthermore, our Supreme Court, in Monterosso v. St. Louis Globe Democrat Publishing Co., Mo., 368 S.W.2d 481 (1963), citing Durant v. Industrial Products Mfg. Co., 241 Mo.App. 266 , 235 S.W.2d 574 (1951) and Quinn v.

Lafayette Park Baptist Church v. Scott

553 S.W.2d 856 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1977

It is not necessary that the standards be unduly rigid or specific, “so long as they are capable of a reasonable application and are sufficient to limit and define the Board’s discretionary powers.” City of Santa Fe v. … See, e. g., City of New Orleans v. Pergament, 198 La. 852 , 5 So.2d 129 (1941); Maher v.

Arthaud v. Grand River Drainage District

208 Mo. App. 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1921

[Morrison v. Moery, 146 Mo. 543, 560 ; Land & Stock Co. v. Miller, 170 Mo. 240, 258 .] … The meaning is that the board may employ one or more, the singular including the *240 plural. [State v. Sweeney, 93 Mo. 38, 41 ; Sec. 7054, R. S. 1919; Commonwealth v. Gabbert, 68 Kentucky, 438, 446.]

Joan L. Robinson v. John F. Lagenbach

439 S.W.3d 853 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 2014

Ironite Prodzrcts Co., Inc. v. Smnuels, 985 S.W.Zd 858, 861 (l\/Io. App. E.D. ]998). 4 Iitterpretatioli of a contract is a question of law. Sy.s'te)ncu're, Inc. v. St. Clicu'les Cozu')ty, 432 S.W.3d 783, 787 (Mo. App. … Waters v. G & B Feeds, Inc., 306 S.W.3d 138, 146 (Mo. App. S.D. 2010).

State ex rel. Beaty v. Randall

79 Mo. App. 226 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1899

The respondents constitute the board of directors of said school. … Deskins v. Gose, 85 Mo. 485 ; King v. Jefferson City School Board, 71 Mo. 629 ; In the Matter of Rebenack, 62 Mo. App. 8 .

Quincy Clark Entertainment, LLC v. Liquor Control

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 2023

Giudicy v. Mercy Hosps. E. … Webb v.

Marose v. Deves

697 S.W.2d 279 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1985

This building will be finished as submitted to the committee with stuccato board; trim in dark brown rough cedar; dark brown stone under the cantilever section; dark brown stain around the rest of the exterior. … In LeBlanc v.