Case law

Union National Bank of Springfield v. Mobley

228 Mo. App. 1235 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1934

Louis v, Meier, 77 Mo. 14 ; Stifel v. Brown, 24 Mo. App. 102 ; Stumpe v. City of Washington, 54 S. W. (2d) 731 . … In Dougherty v.

Hudson v. Wellston School District

796 S.W.2d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1990

Lile v. Hancock Place School District, 701 S.W.2d 500, 504 (Mo.App., E.D.1985). In such a review, this court may only determine whether the board reasonably could have reached the decision it did. … Ortbals v. Special School District of St. Louis County, 762 S.W.2d 437, 439 (Mo.App., E.D.1988). Finally, the determination of the credibility of witnesses is a function of the administrative tribunal.

In re Hutton's Estate

92 Mo. App. 132 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1902

Myers v. Myers, 98 Mo. 262 ; Picot v. O’Fallen, 35 Mo. 29 ; West v. West, 75 Mo. 204 ; North v. Priest, 81 Mo. 562 . … State v. Board, 108 Mo. 241 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 ; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 .

State v. Duncan

540 S.W.2d 130 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1976

Defendant told her that he was “going to get that man” and pointed out a man wearing a brown hat, brown jacket and brown pants. At about 12:30 A.M., Ms. Jamison and Ms. Davenport returned home. Marvin Hemphill (Ms. … She testified that that man was wearing a brown shirt and brown pants.

City of Excelsior Springs v. Redford

795 S.W.2d 123 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1990

In City of Green Ridge v. … The informations in this case are quite similar to the information in City of Raytown v. Roach, 360 S.W.2d 741, 743 [5] (Mo.App.1962), which charged “C & I ACC.”

State ex rel. Willey Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Kansas City

848 S.W.2d 14 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1992

Since that time the Defendant Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) has taken various steps which appear to be contrary to the BZA’s rules. … Bodine v. Farr, 353 Mo. 206 , 182 S.W.2d 173, 174 (1944). Also see Reis v. La Presto, 324 S.W.2d 648, 653-654 (Mo.1959); Drainage Dist. No. 1 Reformed v. Matthews, 361 Mo. 286 , 234 S.W.2d 567, 573 [8—10] (1950).

State v. Carter

840 S.W.2d 238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1992

Brown’s neighbors called the police. They arrived and questioned Ms. Brown about the intruder’s description. She told them he was between 16 and 20 years old and “kind of brown-skinned.” … State v. Sherrill, 657 S.W.2d 731, 737 [15, 16] (Mo.App.1983).

Wendel v. Wendel

72 S.W.3d 626 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2002

See Browning v. Browning, 947 S.W.2d 106, 111 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). … See Browning, 947 S.W.2d at 111 ; Davis, 821 S.W.2d at 124 .

Patricia Watson v. City of St. Peters

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2020

Emerson v. Garvin Group, LLC, 399 S.W.3d 42, 44 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). … Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 976 S.W.2d 439, 446 (Mo. banc 1998).

State v. Edwards

701 S.W.2d 531 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1985

State v. Brooks, 618 S.W.2d 22, 23 (Mo. banc. 1981). The evidence in this case is nearly identical to that presented in State v. Davis, 510 S.W.2d 792 (Mo.App.1974). … The officer testified that Davis threw a brown paper bag, later shown to contain marijuana, from the vehicle.

JOHN DOE, a minor, by and through his Natural Mother, MOTHER DOE v. OZARK CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, Defendant-Respondent

579 S.W.3d 220 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 2019

As observed in Brown v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. … Brown, 665 S.W.2d at 634.

State v. Secrease

859 S.W.2d 278 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1993

State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d 89, 93 [6] (Mo. banc 1989); State v. Gillis, 812 S.W.2d 887, 892 [10] (Mo.App.1991). … State v. Hoopingarner, 845 S.W.2d 89, 93 [12] (Mo.App.1993); State v. Clark, 809 S.W.2d 139, 142 [3] (Mo.App.1991); State v. Hutchinson, 740 S.W.2d 184, 187 [3] (Mo.App.1987).

State of Missouri v. Tyrus A. Young

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2024

State v. … (quoting State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995)); State v. McKay, 459 S.W.3d 450, 455-56 (Mo App. E.D. 2014); Rule 30.20.

Sadler v. Village of Bel-Ridge

741 S.W.2d 889 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1987

This power has been interpreted as allowing the Board to terminate an employee at will without cause. State ex rel. Hicks v. Village of Bel-Ridge, 669 S.W.2d 251, 253 [2] (Mo.App.1984). … See City of Flat River v. Short, 694 S.W.2d 767, 768 [3] (Mo.App.1985). It certainly does not limit the power the Board has under § 80.240 to terminate an employee without cause. See e.g. State ex rel. Gorris v.

Kansas City University of Medicine & Biosciences v. Pletz

351 S.W.3d 254 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2011

Westar Energy, Inc. v. Lake, 552 F.3d 1215, 1225 (10th Cir.2009) (Kansas law; *258 citations omitted); see also Homestore, Inc. v. … Schoon v.

Borbein, Young & Company v. Cirese

401 S.W.2d 940 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1966

Randol v. Kline’s Inc., 330 Mo. 343 , 49 S.W.2d 112 . Also see Dawes v. Starrett, 336 Mo. 897 , 82 S.W.2d 43, 57 , and Baird v. National Health Foundation, 235 Mo.App. 594 , 144 S.W.2d 850, 859 . … Appellants admit that the granting of a continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court and cite three cases so holding, to wit: Brown v. Stroeter, Mo.App., 263 S.W.2d 458 ; Van Fleet v.

State ex rel. Hughlett v. Finley

74 Mo. App. 213 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1898

Rem., sec. 14 and note, and sec. 64; Woodbury v. County Com'rs, 40 Me. 304 . … State ex rel. v. Field, 37 Mo. App. 83 and 102; State ex rel. v. Davis, 54 Mo. App. 447 ; State ex rel. v. R. R., 77 Mo. 143 ; State ex rel. v. Baggott, 96 Mo. loc. cit. 71; School District v.

Beazell v. Farmers Mutual Insurance

214 Mo. App. 430 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1923

[Myers v. German Fire Ins. Co., 166 N. W. 247 ; Nestler v. Germania Fire Ins. Co., 91 N. W. Supp. 29; Woolford v. Phenix Ins. Co., 190 Mass. 233 .] … J. 354; People v. Sterling, etc., Mfg. Co., 82 Ill. 457 .] In Graebner v.

City of Kansas City v. Brammer

847 S.W.2d 90 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1992

Subsequently, Brammer removed the transmission from the white Grand Prix and installed it in a brown automobile. … State v. Brooks 507 S.W.2d 375 (Mo.1974); State v. Gilmore, 650 S.W.2d 627 (Mo. banc 1983). The word “property” is an essential element of the offense charged against Brammer since it is specified in the ordinance.

Robertson v. Police & Firemen's Pension Plan of Joplin

442 S.W.3d 60 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2014

Nance v. Board of Trs. for Firefighters’ Ret. … Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis v. Daly, 129 S.W.3d 405, 408 (Mo.App.