Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

2.11s

  • State v. McRae

    533 S.W.2d 663 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1976

    Brown pursued the Buick at speeds of 85 to 90 miles per hour without overtaking it. Officer Pollard heard Brown’s radio report of the pursuit. … State v. Reed, supra, 453 S.W.2d at 949 ; State v. Ramsey, 368 S.W.2d 413, 417 (Mo.1963); State v. Turnbough, 497 S.W.2d 856, 859 (Mo.App.1973); State v. Lemon, 504 S.W.2d 676, 683 (Mo.App.1973).” State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Duncan

    540 S.W.2d 130 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1976

    Defendant told her that he was “going to get that man” and pointed out a man wearing a brown hat, brown jacket and brown pants. At about 12:30 A.M., Ms. Jamison and Ms. Davenport returned home. Marvin Hemphill (Ms. … She testified that that man was wearing a brown shirt and brown pants.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Sadler v. Village of Bel-Ridge

    741 S.W.2d 889 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1987

    This power has been interpreted as allowing the Board to terminate an employee at will without cause. State ex rel. Hicks v. Village of Bel-Ridge, 669 S.W.2d 251, 253 [2] (Mo.App.1984). … See City of Flat River v. Short, 694 S.W.2d 767, 768 [3] (Mo.App.1985). It certainly does not limit the power the Board has under § 80.240 to terminate an employee without cause. See e.g. State ex rel. Gorris v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. McGauley

    629 S.W.2d 414 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

    City of Kennett v. Labor Industrial Relations Commission, 610 S.W.2d 623, 626 (Mo. banc 1981) [quoting Board of Education v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-82 (Mo. banc 1976)]; Bland v. … Heusmann v. Priest, 366 S.W.2d 42 (Mo.App.1963); Ruedlinger v. Long, 283 S.W.2d 889 (Mo.App.1955). Compare Vlasak v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Toney Powell, Jr.

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 2025

    One day, as Powell walked up to a busy bus stop in downtown Kansas City, he spotted Victim waiting to board the bus. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kansas City University of Medicine & Biosciences v. Pletz

    351 S.W.3d 254 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2011

    Westar Energy, Inc. v. Lake, 552 F.3d 1215, 1225 (10th Cir.2009) (Kansas law; *258 citations omitted); see also Homestore, Inc. v. … Schoon v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Barber-Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hezel

    76 Mo. App. 135 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1898

    Louis v. R. R., 89 Mo. 44 ; R. R. v. R. R., 105 Mo. 590 ; Lamar v. Weidman, 57 Mo. App. 514 ; 1 Dillon on Mun. … Neosho Water Co. v. Neosho, 136 Mo. 498 ; Asphalt Co. v. Ullman, supra; Neenan v. Smith, 60 Mo. 292 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tyler v. Mitchell

    853 S.W.2d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1993

    Kanagawa v. State By and Through Freeman, 685 S.W.2d 831, 834 (Mo. banc 1985). In his petition, Tyler attached several board forms reporting the reasons for the board’s denial of parole. … This analysis is identical to this court’s reasoning in Fults v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, WD 46927, slip op. at 4-5 (April 6, 1993).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Montfort v. Meier

    142 Mo. App. 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1910

    [Clopton v. Taylor, 49 Mo. App. 117 .] *311 Under the law the board has such authority and discretion as will place it beyond control by mandamus. [State ex rel. v. McGrath, 91 Mo. 386 ; see also State ex rel. v. … Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 ; State ex rel. v. Francis, 95 Mo. 44 ; State ex rel. v. Fort, 180 Mo. 97 .] The judgment is affirmed. All concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Nevels

    804 S.W.2d 380 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1991

    In State v. … State v. Stark, 728 S.W.2d 301 (Mo.App.1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Outcult Advertising Co. v. Barnes

    176 Mo. App. 307 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1914

    Ship us at our expense, as per samples shown, your Buster Brown Ad. Service to cover a period of one year, beginning March 1,1912. This service to consist of 52 Buster Brown cuts, 1 font of type, 8 lbs. in font. … [Layson v. Cooper and Crim v. Crim. supra; Catterlin v. Lusk, 98 Mo. App. 182 , 71 S. W. 1109 ; Magee v. Verity, 97 Mo. App. 296 , 71 S. W. 472 .]” [To the same effect is Bradford v. Wright, 145 Mo. App. 623 , 123 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co.

    658 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983

    Johnson v. General Motors Assembly Division, 605 S.W.2d 511, 512 (Mo.App.1980); Lloyd v. County Electric Co., 599 S.W.2d 57, 60 (Mo.App.1980). … Fowler v. Baalmann, 234 S.W.2d at 17 . (emphasis original).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Baer v. Civilian Personnel Division

    714 S.W.2d 536 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 22, 1986

    City of Kirkwood v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 478 S.W.2d 690, 697 (Mo.App.1972). The Board performs a fact finding function in resolving these issues. City of Columbia v. … Facility, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. Peterson

    121 S.W.3d 240 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2003

    Further, chapter 138 details the procedures for real estate tax assessment review by the Board. St. Peters Hosp. v. Zimmerman, 914 S.W.2d 26, 28 (Mo.App.E.D.1995). … While the above procedures contemplate an appeal to the Board, it is not absolutely necessary to first appeal to the Board to recover for sums paid under protest. Id. In Pentecostal Church of God v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Eubank v. Sayad

    669 S.W.2d 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1984

    We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings and reverse only if there is no substantial evidence in support. Macchi v. Whaley, 586 S.W.2d 70 (Mo.App.1979) [1,2]; Hanebrink v. … State v. Foster, 490 S.W.2d 659 (Mo.App.1973).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Babb v. Missouri Public Service Commission

    414 S.W.3d 64 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 2013

    In Furlong Cos., Inc. v. … See Furlong Cos., Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McAnany v. Shipley

    189 Mo. App. 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1915

    In McGrath v. St. … In Cassady v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mitchem v. Perry

    390 S.W.2d 600 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1965

    Granville v. Gregory, et al. … Crow v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mann v. McSwain

    526 S.W.3d 287 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2017

    On March 7, 2016, the Board cancelled Mann’s parole release date. … Irvin v. Kempker, 152 S.W.3d 358, 360 (Mo. App. W.D. 2004) (citing State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Mo. banc 1992)); see also Bantle v. Dwyer, 195 S.W.3d 428, 431 (Mo. App. S.D. 2006).

    Criticized by Hill v. Mo. Dep't of Corr., 570 S.W.3d 95 (2018)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Herdt v. Koenig

    137 Mo. App. 589 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1909

    [Curtis v. Kiley, 168 Mass. 123 ; Roche v. Sawyer, 176 Mass. 71 .] … In Payne v. C. & A. Ry.

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.