Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.60s

  • McClure v. Princeton Re-Organized School District R-5 of Mercer & Grundy Counties

    307 S.W.2d 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1957

    A school board cannot breach a valid contract merely by making some new arrangement, no matter how legal it may otherwise be. Boswell v. Consolidated School Dist. … In Tate v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Birge v. Bock

    44 Mo. App. 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1891

    Brown, conveyed the property to Joseph Rowe. The plaintiff did not know anything about the heirs of William Adams, or the heirs of Cain J. Brown. … Luckett v. Williamson, 37 Mo. 388 ; Isaacs v. Skrainka, 95 Mo. 518.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bollinger v. Wartman

    24 S.W.3d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2000

    Bollinger appealed his dismissal to the Personnel Advisory Board of the State of Missouri (hereafter “the Board”). … It is the function of the Personnel Advisory Board, not the appellate court, to determine the credibility of witnesses. Kramer v. Mason, 806 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Flynn

    937 S.W.2d 739 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1996

    [by defendant’s attorney] When you took that away from Teresa Brown, what did you do with it? A. … State Highway Commission v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • S & W Cabinets, Inc. v. Consolidated School District No. 6

    901 S.W.2d 266 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1995

    Kanagawa v. State by and through Freeman, 685 S.W.2d 831, 836 [7] (Mo. banc 1985); Yelton v. Becker, 248 S.W.2d 86, 89 [1,2] (Mo.App.1952). … Therefore, the court found the board members were liable. 2 The only Missouri case to address the applicability of official immunity to a school *269 board member’s duties under § 107.170 is C.A. Burton Mach. Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. Moore

    134 Mo. App. 669 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1909

    [Galbreath v. Newton, 30 Mo. App. 393 ; DeSoto v. Showman, 100 Mo. App. 323 ; Heidelberg v. St. Francois Co., 100 Mo. 69 ; Mazett v. Pittsburg, 137 Pa. St. 548.] … [Verdin v. City of St. Louis, 131 Mo. l. c. 98; Keane v. Klausman, 21 Mo. App. 485 ; Perkinson v. Hoolan, 182 Mo. 189 .]”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re A_ N_ ex rel. D_ J. J_.

    500 S.W.2d 284 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1973

    Dew v. Trimble, 306 Mo. 657 , 269 S.W. 617 (banc 1925) ; In re K- W-H-, 477 S.W.2d 433, 438 (Mo.App.1972); In re D-J- A- v. Smith, 477 S.W.2d 718, 720 (Mo.App.1972); State v. Couch, 294 S.W.2d 636, 639 (Mo.App.1956). … Kent v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Tice

    550 S.W.3d 558 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018

    Defendant filed a "Motion to Suppress Evidence of Standard Field Sobriety Tests." 2 Relying on State v. Browning , 458 S.W.3d 418 , 424-30 (Mo. App. … State v. Black , 50 S.W.3d 778 , 786 (Mo. banc 2001) ; Johnson , 207 S.W.3d at 42 ; Browning , 458 S.W.3d at 420 -21 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Larner

    844 S.W.2d 490 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1992

    ’s residence in response to Brown’s alleged suicide.” … Voegtlin v. State, 546 S.W.2d 40, 41 [1] (Mo.App.1977). Defendant alleged only that Whitaker had lied about whether he knew of the true reason for his call to the Brown home.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sherf v. Koster

    371 S.W.3d 903 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 2012

    See Smith v. State, 152 S.W.3d 275, 277-78 (Mo. banc 2005). The Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners was established in an almost identical fashion to the St. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Castle Rock Remodeling, LLC v. Better Business Bureau of Greater St. Louis, Inc.

    354 S.W.3d 234 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2011

    Browne, 525 F.Supp.2d at 1250 . … Aviation Research Group, 416 F.3d 864, 868-71 (8th Cir.2005)(discussed above); Browne v. Avvo, Inc. 525 F.Supp.2d 1249, 1251-53 (W.D.Wa.2007)(dis-cussed above); ZL Techs., Inc. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Bryles

    802 S.W.2d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1991

    . *178 Appellate review of this case is directed to the findings and decisions of the Personnel Advisory Board. Fujita v. Jeffries, 714 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Mo.App.1986); Holt v. … Louis County v. State Tax Comm’n, 562 S.W.2d 384, 337-38 (Mo. banc 1978), quoting State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150, 158 (Mo.App.1974).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Barker v. Barker

    412 S.W.3d 457 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2013

    Wilson-Trice v. Trice, 191 S.W.3d 70, 73 (Mo.App.2006). Points denied. … Brown v. Brown, 370 S.W.3d 684 , 687 n. 1 (Mo.App.2012). .Jeff's complaint that his income was overstated may be raised with the trial court on remand. See Buckner v. Jordan, 952 S.W.2d 710, 712 (Mo. banc 1997).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Stag Mining Co.

    185 Mo. App. 659 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1915

    [Bohn v. Brown, 33 Mich 257 ; Tilley v. Coykendall, 71 N. Y. Supp. 457 ; Ward v. Joslin, 105 Fed. 224 ; Doyle v. Kimball, 52 N. Y. Supp. 195 ; Schrader v. Bank, 133 U. S. 67 , 33 L. Ed. 564 ; Brown v. … authorized capital stock thereof has been in good faith subscribed and actually paid up in lawful money of the United States or in property of the full value thereof, and is in the custody of the persons named as the first board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Boyer v. City of Potosi

    77 S.W.3d 62 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2002

    This court in Boyer v. … Nixon v. Corley, 896 S.W.2d 931, 932 (Mo.1995); State ex rel. McCrate v. Rhodes, 349 Mo. 1071 , 163 S.W.2d 978, 980 (1942); Mississippi-Fox River Drainage Dist. No. 2 of Clark County v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gorris v. Mussman

    612 S.W.2d 357 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1980

    Brandon v. Hickey, 462 S.W.2d 159 (Mo.App.1970). … For example, appellant relies on Cooper v. City of Creve Coeur, 556 S.W.2d 717 (Mo.App.1977); and respondents rely on Russell v. City of Raytown, 544 S.W.2d 48 (Mo.App.1977).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Stiles

    706 S.W.2d 944 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1986

    State v. Poelker, 378 S.W.2d 491, 495 (Mo.1964) (en banc); State v. Vincent, 582 S.W.2d 723, 724 (Mo.App.1979); Nelson v. State, 537 S.W.2d 689, 693 (Mo.App.1976). … In State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Westwood Partnership v. Gogarty

    103 S.W.3d 152 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2003

    Albertus v. … Curtis v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 841 S.W.2d 259, 262 (Mo.App.1992).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Gammon

    903 S.W.2d 248 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1995

    Review is under the standard established by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). … See Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 687 (Mo. banc 1978). . All sectional references are to RSMo 1990 unless otherwise indicated.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Nigh v. City of Savannah

    956 S.W.2d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1997

    As such, it was necessary for the City to introduce these ordinances into evidence before the Board. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Kansas City v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jackson County, 943 S.W.2d 359, 362 (Mo. App. … Consumer Contact Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, 592 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Mo. banc 1980) (quoting City of St. Louis v. Roche, 128 Mo. 541 , 31 S.W. 915, 916 (1895)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.