Case law

State Ex Rel. Wagner v. Fields

218 Mo. App. 155 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1924

[State ex rel. v. Smith, 104 Mo. 661, 666 . See, also, State ex rel. v. Adams, 161 Mo. 349, 362 ; State ex rel. v. Higgins, 84 Mo. App. 531, 534 .] … [State ex rel. v. Dewitt, 160 Mo. App. 304 ; State ex rel. v. Adair County Court, 177 Mo. App. 12 ; State ex rel. v. County Court of Clinton County, 193 Mo. App. 373 ; In re Ashcroft, 193 Mo. App. 486 .]

Ex Parte Diehl

255 S.W.2d 54 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1953

It was held in Mattes v. Taylor, 348 Mo. 434 , 153 S.W.2d 833 , that the status of a paroled prisoner is the same whether he be paroled by the trial court or by the executive. In Silvey v. … Lime v. Blagg, 345 Mo. 1 , 131 S.W.2d 583 . In Ex parte Strauss, 320 Mo. 349 , 7 S. W.2d 1000, 1001 , the law is stated that "* * * A commutation of sentence is a matter of grace or favor.

Williams v. Longtown School District No. 71

468 S.W.2d 673 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1971

Cleary v. Cleary, Mo., 273 S.W.2d 340 [10-12]. … Peter v. Kaufmann, 327 Mo. 915 , 38 S.W.2d 1062 [5,6]. The only record of the school board, meeting as a board, involving the termination of Mrs.

State v. Puckett

691 S.W.2d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1985

State v. Jelks, 672 S.W.2d 722, 723 (Mo.App.1984). … State v. Parton, 637 S.W.2d 42, 43 (Mo.App.1982).

State ex rel. Rabenau v. Beckemeier

436 S.W.2d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1968

Hence if a Board of Adjustment exceeds the authority granted to it a court on review may, and should, hold the Board’s decision to be illegal and void. State ex rel. Nigro v. … The Missouri cases he cites, Krekeler v. St. Louis County Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo., 422 S.W.2d 265 ; Fleming v. Moore Brothers Realty Co., 363 Mo. 305 , 251 S.W.2d 8 ; and Veal v.

Merritt v. State Hospital No. 1, Fulton

403 S.W.2d 940 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1966

Appellant appealed to the Board. A lengthy hearing was held. … Wood v. Wagner Electric Corp. et al., en Banc., 355 Mo. 670 , 197 S.W.2d 647, 649 ; Michler v. Krey Packing Co., en Banc., 363 Mo. 707 , 253 S.W.2d 136 ; Willens v.

Turner v. Caldwell

349 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1961

Plaintiff introduced the court files to show that at one stage of the case Brown had appeared as attorney for the defendant. … Subsequently, on redirect examination of one Mann, a witness for plaintiff, over objection Mann was permitted to testify that Brown wrote out his statement;- that Brown had “* * * something to do with the company defending

Gratz v. City of Kirk-Wood

165 Mo. App. 196 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1912

In Cuming v. … So too, in Dickey v. Porter, 203 Mo. 1 , 101 S.

Kopper Kettle Restaurants, Inc. v. City of St. Robert

439 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1969

Leggett v. Jensen, Mo., 318 S.W.2d 353 . … Morrell v. Harris, supra, 418 S.W.2d at 22 ; Ruedlinger v. Long, Mo.App., 283 S.W.2d 889, 890 [1].

Joshmer v. Fred Weber Contractors, Inc.

294 S.W.2d 576 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1956

She thought the board was safe. … Instead of the photographs showing a board eight feet long extending across the ditch, they reveal a board approximately half that length.

Tiger v. Quality Transportation, Inc.

375 S.W.3d 925 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2012

To similar effect, see Brown v. Morgan County, 212 S.W.3d 200, 204-05 (Mo.App.2007), and cases cited therein. Store urges that Plaintiff cannot “specify what, if any, condition caused her to stumble.” … Brown , which also reversed a summary judgment, was no different. See id. at 203 (“Brown admitted that she does not know how she fell.”).

Panettiere v. Panettiere

945 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 27, 1997

Chaney v. Brown, 673 S.W.2d 510, 511 (Mo.App.1984). … To determine an appropriate amount, the court may consider annual tuition expenses, room and board expenses, including room and board expenses for a child residing in the home of one parent while attending school or during

POPLAR BLUFF INTERNET, INC. v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2014

See Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 111 (Mo.App. W.D. 2006). Such questions of law are reviewed de novo, with no deference to the trial court’s determination of law. Straub v. … See Smith v. City of Kansas City, 635 S.W.2d 78, 79 (Mo.App. W.D. 1982); see also Session v.

Sims v. Baer

732 S.W.2d 916 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1987

V, § 18, and § 536.140, RSMo 1986. … Hermel, Inc. v. State Tax Commission, 564 S.W.2d 888, 894 (Mo. banc 1978); Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 782 (Mo. banc 1976).

State ex rel. Menkhus v. City of Pevely

865 S.W.2d 871 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1993

Kessler v. Shay, 820 S.W.2d 311, 314 [4] (Mo.App.1991). … In City of Bellefontaine Neigh. v. J.J. Kelley R. & B.

Heagy v. Cox

191 Mo. App. 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1915

Brown, named therein, and accepted in writing by plaintiff. … [See Laundry Co. v. Freudenstein, 179 Mo. App. 175 , 161 S. W. 593 ; McDaniel v. United Railways Co. supra.]

Frimel v. Humphrey

555 S.W.2d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1977

Eagleton v. Cameron, 384 S.W.2d 627 (Mo.1964). Furthermore, the denial of a prayer for temporary injunction is not appealable. See Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., supra, and Goldman v. … Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. Louis, 500 S.W.2d 1, 6 (Mo.App.1973).

Smith v. Director of Revenue

77 S.W.3d 120 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2002

In Heskett v. … In Stringer v.

Nutter v. Houston

32 Mo. App. 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1888

In Swartz v. Nicholson, 65 Mo. 508 , these words : “LeRoy, Barton county, Mo., Sept. 19, 1872. S. C. Nicholson debtor to Marion Swartz, fourteen dollars,” were held insufficient. In Rosenberg v. Boyd, 14 Mo. … In Weese v. Brown, 28 Mo. App. 521 , this statement: “1884. Henry Brown, Dr. to Joseph Weese, to amount due on contract for digging well, $60.00,” was held bad and insufficient.

Sierk v. Reynolds

484 S.W.2d 675 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1972

Brown v. Bibb, 356 Mo. 148 , 201 S.W.2d 370, 374 . … No. 1 v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S.W. 517, 519-521 [1] [2]; Floersheim v. Board of Com’rs of Harding County, *681 28 N.M. 330 , 212 P. 451, 453-454 [1][2][3][4][5]; Ashton v.