Case law

Strickland v. Taco Bell Corp.

849 S.W.2d 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1993

Brown v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., Inc., 665 S.W.2d 630, 634 (Mo.App.1983); Rossmann v. G.F.C. Corp. of Missouri, 596 S.W.2d 469, 473 (Mo.App.1980); Wolf-meyer v. … See, e.g., Board of Architects v. Earth Resources, 820 S.W.2d 505, 513 (Mo.App.1991) (Berrey, P.J. dissenting). 2 .

Hawkins v. City of Fayette

604 S.W.2d 716 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1980

See also Reilly v. Board of Selectmen of Framingham, 345 Mass. 363 , 187 N.E.2d 838, 840 [4] (1963); and Nantucket Land C. v. Plan. … Wolf v.

Willard Reorganized School District No. 2 v. Springfield Reorganized School District No. 12

241 Mo. App. 934 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1952

No. 71 v. Purported “Enlarged School District, etc. ’ ’, supra; State v. Gardner, supra. In State v. Thompson, Mo. Sup., 19 S. … State v.

Hickman v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Co.

238 Mo. App. 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1945

They have a kind of rough surface, and are brown in color. … He testified that about four or five years prior to April 11, 1941, the date of the hearing, brown spots began to appear upon his hands which looked like brown warts; that in the summer or fall of 1939 an open sore developed

Sauvain v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co.

339 S.W.3d 555 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2011

Brown v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.. … Brown, 776 S.W.2d at 888 .

Phillips v. Ozark Bank

803 S.W.2d 662 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1991

McFarland v. Bollinger, 792 S.W.2d 903, 904 (Mo.App.1990). All of the evidence and legitimate inferences therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the award. Brown v. … McFarland, 792 S.W.2d at 907 ; McClain v. Welsh Co., 748 S.W.2d 720, 728 (Mo.App.1988).

Carroll Construction Company v. Kansas City

278 S.W.2d 817 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1955

Several members of the Board then indicated that the Board could not approve the plan without a binding lease indicating who would occupy the property. … The scope of review, by a' court, of the decision of an administrative tribúnál has been discussed in many decisions, A brief statement of the rule is found in Wood v.

Gaffigan v. Whaley

600 S.W.2d 195 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1980

Plaintiff relies upon State v. Harris, 313 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.1958), and State v. … We must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the decision of the Board, Aubuchon v. Gasconade Cty. R-1 Sch.

Donald Placke, Jr. v. The City of Sunset Hills, Missouri, City of Sunset Hills Board of Adjustment, Patricia Fribis, Ryan Patton, and William Weber

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2023

State v. Unganisha, 253 S.W.3d 108, 109 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008). … Likewise, Point III states that “the Board’s decision was contrary to law and the Board exceeded its authority.” These multifarious points leave nothing for our review. T.G. v. D.W.H., 648 S.W.3d 42, 49 (Mo. App.

Mason v. Commonwealth

559 S.W.3d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2018

Commonwealth v. Stone, 291 S.W.3d 696 , 701-02 (Ky. 2009). Id. at 702 . Brown v. Commonwealth, 313 S.W.3d 577 , 631 (Ky. 2010). Id. (citing Funk v. Commonwealth, 842 S.W.2d 476 , 483 (Ky. 1992) ). … Brown, 313 S.W.3d at 631 (citing Furnish v. Commonwealth, 95 S.W.3d 34 (Ky. 2002) ). Brown, 313 S.W.3d at 631 .

State ex rel. Cainsville Reorganized School District No. 1 of Harrison County v. Tomes

299 S.W.2d 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1957

Folkers v. … Schwerdt v.

State v. Todd

935 S.W.2d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1996

In addition, Brown testified that the intersection’s design was within standard norms. … Defendant’s witness, Richard Brown, said that the concrete island is not located in or on the roadway and that the intersection’s design was within standard norms. This case is similar to State v. Garrett, supra.

Melton v. ACF Industries, Inc.

404 S.W.2d 772 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1966

In the case of Gershon v. … In the case of Frazier v. Ford Motor Company, 365 Mo. 62 , 276 S.W.2d 95, 1 . c. 101, the court said: “In Boles v.

State v. Moss

187 Mo. App. 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1915

[State ex rel. v. Garesche, supra; State ex rel. v. Berg, 76 Mo. 136 ; High on Extraordinary Legal Remedies (2 Ed.), p. 63, et seq.; State ex rel. v. Steers, supra; State ex rel. v. Stuckey, 78 Mo. … App. 533 ; State ex rel. v. Trigg, 72 Mo. 365 ; 26 Cyc., p. 275; 15 Cyc., p. 384; State ex rel. v. Francis, 88 Mo. 557 ; State ex rel. v. Mason, 77 Mo. 189 ; State ex rel. v.

McGraw-Edison Co. v. Curry

485 S.W.2d 175 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1972

Wilson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Wilson, Mo.Sup., 332 S.W.2d 867, 871 . Without proof of notice, the Board lacked jurisdiction and its proceedings raising plaintiff’s valuation were void. State ex rel. Lane v. … (2) V.

State Ex Rel. Henze v. Wetzel

754 S.W.2d 888 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1988

In McClain v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. … Readington, 90 N.J.Super. 341 , 217 A.2d 622 (1966); Hennigh v. Board of County Com’rs. of Colo. of Boulder, 168 Colo. 128 , 450 P.2d 73 (banc 1969); Lanaux v.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DeCaigney

927 S.W.2d 907 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1996

Dunkin v. Reagon, 710 S.W.2d 498, 499 (Mo.App.1986). … See Brown v. Don-ham, 900 S.W.2d 630, 632 (Mo. banc 1995). We are aware of nothing which would prohibit a claimant from filing a post-verdict motion for prejudgment interest.

McMorrow v. Dowell

116 Mo. App. 289 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1905

But in the case of Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 82 , 49 S. … It is true that in Curd v. Brown, it was the plaintiff who' was held incompetent; whereas in the present case Mrs. Levy is no party to the action.

Millis v. Scottish Union & National Insurance

95 Mo. App. 211 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1902

Blinn v. Ins. Co., 85 Maine 389 ; Brown v. Ins. Co., ante; Huckins v. Ins. Co., 31 *218 N. H. 238; Holmes v. Ins. Co., 10 Met. 211 ; Ashland v. Ins. Co., 10 Ohio St. 10 ; Copeland v. Reservoir Co., 105 Mass. 396 . … Foundry & Machine Co. v. Cole, 130 Mo. 1 ; Graves v. Pierce, 53 Mo. 423 ; Richardson v. Koch, 81 Mo. 264 ; Brown v.

Deitderick v. Missouri Iron & Metal Co.

222 Mo. App. 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1928

W. 51 ; Deschner v. Railroad Co., 200 Mo. 310 , 98 S. W. 737 ; Tranburger v. Railroad Co., 250 Mo. 46 , 156 S. W. 694 .] We rule against defendant on this point. … [Priestley v. Laederich, 2 S. W. (2d Series), 631; Sinnamon v. Moore, 161 Mo. App. 168 , 142 S. W. 494 ; Grant v. Railway, 25 Mo. App. 227 .]