Case law

Miller Franklin & Co. v. Gentry

230 Mo. App. 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1935

of the business of Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company. … Eq. 275 ; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78 ; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York, 198 F. 721 ; Davis v. Grey, 16 Wall. 203 ; Kreling v.

Carter v. City of Pagedale

982 S.W.2d 744 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1998

Co. v. Sommers, 954 S.W.2d 18, 19 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). … As the Missouri Supreme Court stated in Hadley v.

Johnston v. Kansas City

211 Mo. App. 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1922

[Carrington v. St. Louis, 89 Mo. 208 ; Bonine v. Richmons, 75 Mo. 437 ; Franke v. St. Louis, 110 Mo. 516 .] ” Defendant City cites the cases of Hesselbach v. City of St. Louis, 179 Mo. 505 ; Buckley v. … [Brown v. Lumber Co., 202 Mo. App. 573, 582 ; Bank v. Simpson, 152 Mo. 638 , 54 S. W. 506 ; Independence Electric Co. v. Farley Bros., 192 S. W. (Mo. App.) 129.]

State ex rel. Union Electric Co. v. Scott

470 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1971

Leggett v. Jensen, Mo., 318 S.W.2d 353 . The full subject of review was discussed in that case and in the subsequent case of Morrell v. Harris, Mo., 418 S.W.2d 20 . … Lambert v. Flynn, 348 Mo. 525 , 154 S.W.2d 52 ; Crockett Oil Company v. Effie, Mo.App., 374 S.W.2d 154 .

Senter v. Ferguson

486 S.W.2d 644 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1972

The Brown case held that a deviation from an M.A.I. instruction which does not need modification under the facts in the case establishes a presumption of prejudicial error. Likewise, in Houston v. … Consequently, we have held in cases such as Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255 , and Murphy v.

Butcher v. Hoffman

99 Mo. App. 239 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903

Stubbs v. Mulholland, 168 Mo. 47 . … Van Sickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627 ; Stubbs v. Mulholland, supra.

Strickland v. Taco Bell Corp.

849 S.W.2d 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1993

Brown v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., Inc., 665 S.W.2d 630, 634 (Mo.App.1983); Rossmann v. G.F.C. Corp. of Missouri, 596 S.W.2d 469, 473 (Mo.App.1980); Wolf-meyer v. … See, e.g., Board of Architects v. Earth Resources, 820 S.W.2d 505, 513 (Mo.App.1991) (Berrey, P.J. dissenting). 2 .

Place v. P.M. Place Stores Co.

950 S.W.2d 862 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1997

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.1976). … Gieselmann v. Stegeman, 443 S.W.2d 127, 131 (Mo.1969).

Lindbergh School District v. Syrewicz

516 S.W.2d 507 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1974

to obey the school laws of the state or the published regulations of the board of edution of the school district employing him...." [6] Ferguson v. … Thomas, 430 F.2d 852 (5th Cir.1970); Fluker v.

G.J.R.B. ex rel. R.J.K. v. J.K.B.

269 S.W.3d 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 2008

In a case with strikingly similar facts, the Eastern District of our court, in Brown v. … Brown, 141 S.W.3d at 82 .

Ray v. Ray

336 S.W.2d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1960

Plaintiff complained that she spent too much time with Brown, and eventually the marriage collapsed in the lap of an attachment between defendant and Brown. However, the merits of the divorce are not in issue here. … After the separation plaintiff also took from defendant’s room a number of letters which had been written her by Brown and a watch which he said Brown had given her. No value is stated for the watch.

Ivie v. McMunigal

66 Mo. App. 437 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1896

Carson v. Springfield, 53 Mo. 289 ; Finney v. Berry, 61 Mo. 359 ; Brown v. Railroad, 80 Mo. 451 ; Bielman v. Railroad, 50 Mo. App. 151 ; Paddock v. Somes, 51 Mo. App. 320 ; Scott v. Nevada, 56 Mo. … App. 191 ; Van Hoozier v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 145 ; Dickson v. Rock Island, 71 Mo. 575 ; Benson v. Railroad, 78 Mo. 575; Brown v. Railroad, 80 Mo. 457 ; Smith v. Railroad, 98 Mo. 20 .

State ex rel. Bank of Belton v. Wray

55 Mo. App. 646 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1894

Johnson v. School Dist., 67 Mo. 321 ; Kane v. School Dist., 48 Mo. App. 408 -415. … Cooley on Taxation [2 Ed.], 320 etc; Halleck v. Boylston, 117 Mass. 469 ; Welles v. Battelle, 11 Mass. 477 ; Mott v. Reynolds, 27 Vt. 206 .

City of Marshall ex rel. Jacoby v. Rainey

78 Mo. App. 416 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1899

It may be the board could act unreasonably in passing upon such questions, though as to this it is not necessary for us to say. We do not see that the case of Independence v. … See Springfield v. Knott, 49 Mo. App. 617 . It is next insisted that there were no bids taken before the work was let.

State Ex Rel. Hall v. Wolf

710 S.W.2d 302 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1986

Watkins v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 651 S.W.2d 582, 585 (Mo.App.1983); Feltz v. … The Board complied with procedures for impeachment of the Mayor of a fourth class city set forth in § 79.240, supra. See Rose v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 397 S.W.2d 570, 574 (Mo.1965); Tonnar v.

State Ex Rel. School District No. 34 v. Begeman

221 Mo. App. 257 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1928

[State ex rel. v. Andrea, 216 Mo. 617 , 116 S. W. 561 ; School District v. Chappel, 155 Mo. App. 498 , 135 S. W. 75 .] … [See School District v. School District, 254 S. W. 726 ; State ax rel. v. Stone, 152 Mo. 202 , 53 S. W. 1069 .]

Dickens v. La Tourette

663 S.W.2d 250 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1983

The Board was also free to order the same or a lesser discipline. Morice v. … We therefore defer to the findings and judgment of the Board. Wilhite v. Hurd, 411 S.W.2d 72, 77 (Mo.1967); Sowder v. Board of Police Commissioners, 553 S.W.2d 525, 527 (Mo.App.1977).

School District v. Pace

113 Mo. App. 134 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1905

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 ;. State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. App. 162 .] … In the case of State ex rel. v. Stone, 152 Mo. 202 , 53 S.

State v. Gibson

543 S.W.2d 273 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1976

State v. Temple, supra, at p. 305. … State v. Yearwood, 510 S.W.2d 43, 44 [1] (Mo.App.1974). . See State v. Eaton, 504 S.W.2d 12, 20 [16] (Mo.1973), and compare State v. Wright, 339 Mo. 41 , 95 S.W.2d 1159 (1936). .

Strayer v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad

170 Mo. App. 514 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1913

In the later case of Browning v. … [Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 ; Minter v. Bradstreet, 174 Mo. 491 ; Smith v. Fordyce, 190 Mo. 32 .]”