Case law

Butcher v. Hoffman

99 Mo. App. 239 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903

Stubbs v. Mulholland, 168 Mo. 47 . … Van Sickle v. Brown, 68 Mo. 627 ; Stubbs v. Mulholland, supra.

Jobe v. AAA Trailer Servs., Inc.

544 S.W.3d 306 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 2018

Miller v. City of Wentzville , 371 S.W.3d 54 , 57 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012) (citing Kinnaman-Carson v. Westport Ins. … We find the instant case similar to Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co. , 291 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. App. E.D. 2009).

Cooper v. Holden

189 S.W.3d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2006

by the Board. … Further, this court stated in Johnson v.

Ky. Bar Ass'n v. Gevedon

574 S.W.3d 739 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2019

We find Gevedon not guilty of Count V in KBA File 18-DIS-0094. Furthermore, we agree, for the most part, with the Board's recommended discipline. … In Kentucky Bar Ass'n v.

Hellmann v. Union School District

170 S.W.3d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 2005

Artherton v. Board of Education of the School District of St. Joseph, 744 S.W.2d 518, 522 (Mo.App. W.D.1988); Beck v. James, 793 S.W.2d 416, 418 (Mo.App. … Hell-mann cites Iven v. Hazelwood, supra, and Dameron v. Board of Education of Lebanon School District R-3, 549 S.W.2d 671 (Mo.App.1977).

Miller Franklin & Co. v. Gentry

230 Mo. App. 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1935

of the business of Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company. … Eq. 275 ; Stuart v. Boulware, 133 U.S. 78 ; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York, 198 F. 721 ; Davis v. Grey, 16 Wall. 203 ; Kreling v.

Blunt v. Parker

495 S.W.2d 708 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 1973

V, § 22, Mo.Const.1945, is altered “as provided by law” and the court’s power to review is thus abrogated by the County Charter provision since that provision provides for review. Respondent cites Brogoto v. … City of Kirkwood v. Missouri State Bd. of Mediation, 478 S.W.2d 690, 693 (Mo.App.1972); McCallister v. Priest, 422 S.W.2d 650 (Mo. 1968); Johnson v. Priest, 398 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.App.1965).

Johnston v. Kansas City

211 Mo. App. 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1922

[Carrington v. St. Louis, 89 Mo. 208 ; Bonine v. Richmons, 75 Mo. 437 ; Franke v. St. Louis, 110 Mo. 516 .] ” Defendant City cites the cases of Hesselbach v. City of St. Louis, 179 Mo. 505 ; Buckley v. … [Brown v. Lumber Co., 202 Mo. App. 573, 582 ; Bank v. Simpson, 152 Mo. 638 , 54 S. W. 506 ; Independence Electric Co. v. Farley Bros., 192 S. W. (Mo. App.) 129.]

State ex rel. Union Electric Co. v. Scott

470 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 1971

Leggett v. Jensen, Mo., 318 S.W.2d 353 . The full subject of review was discussed in that case and in the subsequent case of Morrell v. Harris, Mo., 418 S.W.2d 20 . … Lambert v. Flynn, 348 Mo. 525 , 154 S.W.2d 52 ; Crockett Oil Company v. Effie, Mo.App., 374 S.W.2d 154 .

Senter v. Ferguson

486 S.W.2d 644 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1972

The Brown case held that a deviation from an M.A.I. instruction which does not need modification under the facts in the case establishes a presumption of prejudicial error. Likewise, in Houston v. … Consequently, we have held in cases such as Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 255 , and Murphy v.

Strickland v. Taco Bell Corp.

849 S.W.2d 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1993

Brown v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., Inc., 665 S.W.2d 630, 634 (Mo.App.1983); Rossmann v. G.F.C. Corp. of Missouri, 596 S.W.2d 469, 473 (Mo.App.1980); Wolf-meyer v. … See, e.g., Board of Architects v. Earth Resources, 820 S.W.2d 505, 513 (Mo.App.1991) (Berrey, P.J. dissenting). 2 .

Place v. P.M. Place Stores Co.

950 S.W.2d 862 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1997

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.1976). … Gieselmann v. Stegeman, 443 S.W.2d 127, 131 (Mo.1969).

Ray v. Ray

336 S.W.2d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1960

Plaintiff complained that she spent too much time with Brown, and eventually the marriage collapsed in the lap of an attachment between defendant and Brown. However, the merits of the divorce are not in issue here. … After the separation plaintiff also took from defendant’s room a number of letters which had been written her by Brown and a watch which he said Brown had given her. No value is stated for the watch.

Warner v. Wurm

254 S.W.3d 148 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 2008

Chapman v. Sanders, 528 S.W.2d 462, 464 (Mo.App. St. Louis 1975). … We find that the Board’s reliance on Chapman is misplaced. *152 The Board also relied on Dodson v. McGauley, 629 S.W.2d 414 (Mo.App. E.D.1981).

State v. Young

172 S.W.3d 494 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2005

State v. Rehberg, 919 S.W.2d 543, 552 (Mo.App.1995). … State v. Kelly, 43 S.W.3d 343, 350 (Mo.App.2001); see also State v. Talkington, 858 S.W.2d 802, 804 (Mo.App.1993).

Wright v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.

236 Mo. App. 872 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1941

A full exposition of the law upon the subject is contained *Page 891 in the following cases: Railroad Co. v. Justice, 80 Kan. 10 , 101 P. 469 ; McCallion v. Railway Co., 74 Kan. 785 , 88 P. 50 ; M.K. T. Ry. Co. v. … Co. v. Penfold, 57 Kan. 148 , 45 P. 574 ; Bailey v. Kelly, 93 Kan. 723 , 145 P. 556 ; Colwell v. Parker, 81 Kan. 295 , 105 P. 524 ; Smith v. Mead Const. Co., 129 Kan. 229 , 233, 282 P. 708 .

State Ex Rel. Hall v. Wolf

710 S.W.2d 302 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1986

Watkins v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 651 S.W.2d 582, 585 (Mo.App.1983); Feltz v. … The Board complied with procedures for impeachment of the Mayor of a fourth class city set forth in § 79.240, supra. See Rose v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 397 S.W.2d 570, 574 (Mo.1965); Tonnar v.

State Ex Rel. School District No. 34 v. Begeman

221 Mo. App. 257 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1928

[State ex rel. v. Andrea, 216 Mo. 617 , 116 S. W. 561 ; School District v. Chappel, 155 Mo. App. 498 , 135 S. W. 75 .] … [See School District v. School District, 254 S. W. 726 ; State ax rel. v. Stone, 152 Mo. 202 , 53 S. W. 1069 .]

McGraw-Edison Co. v. Curry

485 S.W.2d 175 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1972

Wilson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Wilson, Mo.Sup., 332 S.W.2d 867, 871 . Without proof of notice, the Board lacked jurisdiction and its proceedings raising plaintiff’s valuation were void. State ex rel. Lane v. … (2) V.

School District v. Pace

113 Mo. App. 134 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1905

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 ;. State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. App. 162 .] … In the case of State ex rel. v. Stone, 152 Mo. 202 , 53 S.