Case law

State Ex Rel. Dahm v. Goodin

295 S.W.2d 600 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1956

Board of Directors of R-V, Mercer County, the respondent, C. … Hammond, being Secretary of the Board; that on February 18, 1956, a petition hereafter referred to as First Petition, signed by more than ten qualified voters and taxpayers of R-V, Mercer County, was filed with the Boards

State ex rel. McTague v. McClellan

532 S.W.2d 870 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1976

Taylor v. Wade, 360 Mo. 895 , 231 S.W.2d 179, 181-2 (en banc 1950). … Hopkins v. Stemmons, 302 S.W.2d 51, 54 [4] (Mo.App.1957) in which the statutory language “shall be given” was interpreted.

State v. Todd

935 S.W.2d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1996

In addition, Brown testified that the intersection’s design was within standard norms. … Defendant’s witness, Richard Brown, said that the concrete island is not located in or on the roadway and that the intersection’s design was within standard norms. This case is similar to State v. Garrett, supra.

State ex rel. Rabenau v. Beckemeier

436 S.W.2d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1968

Hence if a Board of Adjustment exceeds the authority granted to it a court on review may, and should, hold the Board’s decision to be illegal and void. State ex rel. Nigro v. … The Missouri cases he cites, Krekeler v. St. Louis County Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo., 422 S.W.2d 265 ; Fleming v. Moore Brothers Realty Co., 363 Mo. 305 , 251 S.W.2d 8 ; and Veal v.

Williams v. Longtown School District No. 71

468 S.W.2d 673 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1971

Cleary v. Cleary, Mo., 273 S.W.2d 340 [10-12]. … Peter v. Kaufmann, 327 Mo. 915 , 38 S.W.2d 1062 [5,6]. The only record of the school board, meeting as a board, involving the termination of Mrs.

State v. Frison

775 S.W.2d 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1989

Venireperson Brown was struck for two reasons. First, a brother had been convicted of stealing, and second, Brown did not press charges against an individual who was caught for burglarizing his home. … See generally, State v.

STATE EX REL. MO. STATE BD. OF REG. FOR HEALING ARTS v. Hartenbach

768 S.W.2d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1989

Alberici v. City of Fenton, 576 S.W.2d 574 (Mo.App.1979) [3]. In Schierding v. Missouri Dental Board, 705 S.W.2d 484 (Mo.App.1985) l.c. 486 citing Weinberger v. … Weinberger v. Salfi, supra; Schierding, supra.

Kansas Ass'n of Private Investigators v. Mulvihill

35 S.W.3d 425 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2000

Riordan v. Dierker, 956 S.W.2d 258, 261 (Mo. banc 1997). Riordan involved the Board of the Police Retirement System of St. Louis, and the Board of Police Commissioners of Metropolitan St. Louis. … in Count V. 6 .

Blackwell v. City of St. Louis

778 S.W.2d 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 1989

Wakup v. Brown, 637 S.W.2d 335, 337 (Mo.App.1982). … See, e.g., Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Frimel v. Humphrey

555 S.W.2d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1977

Eagleton v. Cameron, 384 S.W.2d 627 (Mo.1964). Furthermore, the denial of a prayer for temporary injunction is not appealable. See Bayer v. Associated Underwriters, Inc., supra, and Goldman v. … Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. Louis, 500 S.W.2d 1, 6 (Mo.App.1973).

State v. Griffin

246 S.W.2d 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1952

Sharp v. Knight, 224 Mo.App. 761 , 26 S.W.2d 1011, 1016 ; State ex rel. Dilliner v. Cummins, 338 Mo. 609 , 92 S.W.2d 605, 607 ; State ex rel. v. Darby, 33 Mo. 1145 , 64 S.W.2d 911 . … Baxter v. School District, 217 Mo.App. 389 , 266 S. W. 760 ; Edwards v. School District, 221 Mo.App. 47 , 297 S.W. 1001 .

One Hundred Two Glenstone, Inc. v. BD. OF ADJ. OF CITY OF SPRINGFIELD

572 S.W.2d 891 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

Tustin Heights Ass’n v. Board of Supervisors, 170 Cal.App.2d 619 , 339 P.2d 914, 919 [1] (1959). … Waeckerle v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 525 S.W.2d 351, 358 [2] (Mo.App.1975).

Sierk v. Reynolds

484 S.W.2d 675 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1972

Brown v. Bibb, 356 Mo. 148 , 201 S.W.2d 370, 374 . … No. 1 v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 , 265 S.W. 517, 519-521 [1] [2]; Floersheim v. Board of Com’rs of Harding County, *681 28 N.M. 330 , 212 P. 451, 453-454 [1][2][3][4][5]; Ashton v.

Mort v. Trustees of Baker University

229 Mo. App. 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1935

BROWN.” … [See Price v. Maxwell, 28 Pa. 23, 39 ; Teaele’s Estate, 153 Pa. 219 ; Read v. Manning, 30 Miss. 308 ; Hariston v. Hariston, 30 Miss. 276 ; Wheat v. Lacals, 139 Miss. 300 .]

Colombo v. Buford

935 S.W.2d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1996

Louis, N.A. v. Findley, 874 S.W.2d 409, 411 (Mo.App.1994); see also Guier v. Guier, 918 S.W.2d 940, 946 (Mo.App.1996). … Comm. v. Houston Indep. Sch.

Veal v. Leimkuehler

267 S.W.2d 387 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1954

Badger Lumber Co. v. Goodrich, 353 Mo. 769 , 184 S.W.2d 435 ; City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank, 351 Mo. 688 , 173 S.W.2d 837 ; Crabtree v Ætna Life Ins. Co., 341 Mo. 1173 , 111 S.W.2d 103 . … Spotts v. Spotts, 331 Mo. 942 , 55 S.W.2d 984 ; Townsend v. Boatmen’s Nat. Bank, Mo.App., . 148 S.W.2d 85 ; State ex rel. Caplow v. Kirkwood, Mo. App., 117 S.W.2d 652 ; Hecht Bros. Clothing Co. v.

Fischer v. Vonck

614 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1981

Browne and Robert A. Dakapolos (two lawyers who had represented plaintiff along the way).” … See, for a related case, Fischer v. Browne, et al., 586 S.W.2d 733 (Mo.App.1980). . See, for the essential elements of a legal malpractice action, Togstad v.

Bourke v. Foster

343 S.W.2d 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1960

Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491 ; Cunningham v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 276 S.W.2d 633 . As stated in State ex rel. Nigro v. … Kansas City et al., 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030, 1032 , which statement was approved by this court in McKinney v.

Wehrle v. Cassor

708 S.W.2d 788 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1986

“[I]f a Board of Adjustment exceeds the authority granted to it a court on review may, and should, hold the Board’s decision to be illegal and void.” State ex rel. Rabenau v. … Rabenau v. Beckemeier, 436 S.W.2d 52, 57 (Mo.App.1968). In Conner v.

Patterson v. Thompson

277 S.W.2d 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1955

Tetherow v. St. Joseph & Des Moines R., Co., 98 Mo. 74 , loc. cit. 77, 11 S.W. 310 ; Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. Co., 99 Mo. 310 , loc. cit. 317, 12 S.W. 655 ; Sandretto v. Quincy, O. & K. C. R. … In Bourne v.