Case law

EMERALD POINTE, LLC v. TANEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, Defendants-Respondents

578 S.W.3d 390 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2019

Nazeri v. Mo. Valley Coll., 860 S.W.2d 303, 306 (Mo. banc 1993). Smith v. Humane Soc'y of United States, 519 S.W.3d 789, 797–98 (Mo. banc 2017). … In their brief in support of this contention, Defendants quote from Deffenbaugh Indus., Inc. v.

Patterson v. Thompson

277 S.W.2d 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1955

Tetherow v. St. Joseph & Des Moines R., Co., 98 Mo. 74 , loc. cit. 77, 11 S.W. 310 ; Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. Co., 99 Mo. 310 , loc. cit. 317, 12 S.W. 655 ; Sandretto v. Quincy, O. & K. C. R. … In Bourne v.

Hartog v. Siegler

615 S.W.2d 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1981

State Park Board v. Tate, 365 Mo. 1213 , 295 S.W.2d 167, 168 [3], 59 A.L.R.2d 933 (banc 1956). … Brown v. Brown, 495 S.W.2d 89, 92 [1] (Mo.App.1973). That is not the case here; the award does not shock our sense of justice, and we rule this point against appellants. Judgment affirmed.

Double AA Market, LLC v. Mona Parsley

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2024

Board of Zoning Adjustment of City of Kansas City, 543 S.W.3d 28, 33 (Mo. banc 2018); State ex rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 24 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Mo. banc 2000). … Moto, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 88 S.W.3d 96, 105 (Mo. App. E.D. 2002).

Dickinson v. Lueckenhoff

598 S.W.2d 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1980

Board of Zoning Adjustment, 307 S.W.2d 730 (Mo.App.1957); State ex rel De Weese v. … Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra. See also Dittmeier v.

State ex rel. Kiely v. Schmidli

583 S.W.2d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1979

State v. Hawkins, 337 S.W.2d 441, 443 (Mo.App.1960). … Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Missouri Pac. R.

Lindbergh School District v. Syrewicz

516 S.W.2d 507 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1974

to obey the school laws of the state or the published regulations of the board of edution of the school district employing him...." [6] Ferguson v. … Thomas, 430 F.2d 852 (5th Cir.1970); Fluker v.

Martin v. Bennett

139 Mo. App. 237 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1909

[Ranney v. Bader, 67 Mo. 476 ; Black v. Ross, 37 Mo. App. 250 .] The court committed no error in permitting the amended petition to be filed. [Cohn v. Souders, 175 Mo. 455 .] … In Thornburg v.

Edwards v. Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis

410 S.W.2d 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1966

Wood v. Wagner Electric Corp., 355 Mo. 670 , 197 S.W.2d 647 ; Thacker v. Massman Construction Co., Mo.Sup., 247 S.W.2d 623 ; Carroll Construction Co. v. Kansas City, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 817 ; State ex rel. Bond v. … Doughton v. Marland Refining Co., 331 Mo. 280 , 53 S.W.2d 236 ; DeMoss v. Evens & Howard *568 Fire Brick Co., Mo.App., 57 S.W.2d 720 ; Buchanan v. Nicozisis, Mo.App., 78 S.W.2d 492 . And see Gleason v.

Lyons v. Lyons

101 Mo. App. 494 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 12, 1903

State, to use of Peppler, Admr. etc., v. School et al., 47 Mo. 84 ; Gamble v. Gibson, 59 Mo. 585 ; Dix v. Morris, 66 Mo. 514 ; Lewis v. Carson, 93 Mo. l. c. 581. … In Brown v.

State ex rel. Ciaramitaro v. City of Charlack

679 S.W.2d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1984

See Lewis v. Price, 11 Mo. 398 (1848); Bastan v. Board of Trustees of The Fireman’s Fund, 88 Mo.App. 22, 23 (1901). … Co. v.

Mitchell v. City of Springfield

410 S.W.2d 585 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1966

Johnson v. Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Pension Fund of City of Madison, 170 Wis. 154 , 174 N.W. 465 ; State ex rel. King v. … Evans v. Klusmeyer, 301 Mo. 352 , 256 S.W. 1036, 1040 . The subject is discussed with convincing logic in National Labor Relations Board v.

Reorganized School District, R-II, De Kalb & Andrew Counties v. John

312 S.W.2d 171 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1958

Reorganized School Dist. etc. v. … Reorganized School Dist., etc. v.

Vlasak v. Alternative System of the Police Retirement System of St. Louis

435 S.W.2d 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1968

.; Johnson v. Priest, Mo.App., 398 S.W.2d 33 , Heusmann v. Priest, Mo.App., 366 S.W.2d 42 . … Palm v. Southwest Missouri Wholesale Liquor Co., Mo.App., 176 S.W.2d 528 ; Sanderson v. Producers Commission Ass’n., 360 Mo. 571 , 229 S.W.2d 563 ; Scott v. Wheelock Bros., 357 Mo. 480 , 209 S.W.2d 149 .

Ford v. Politte

618 S.W.2d 44 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1981

Martin v. Yeoham, supra. The case is unlike those relied upon by the appellant, such as Eoff v. … Eoff and such cases as Sharp v.

State v. Hightower

951 S.W.2d 712 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1997

Officer Brown got out of the patrol car and approached the passenger side of the stopped car. Defendant was in the car. Officer Brown told defendant to get out and put his hands on top of the car. … When defendant got out of the car, Officer Brown took hold of one of his arms. Defendant broke loose and ran. Officer Brown chased defendant.

Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.

603 S.W.2d 627 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 27, 1980

A loss of $29,444.00 for the first quarter of 1968 was reported in an April 30, 1968 board meeting. Respondent Sweaney attended all of these board meetings. … Willis v. City of Browning, 161 Mo.App. 461, 464 , 143 S.W. 516, 517 [3—4] (1912).

McNeal v. Bequette

571 S.W.2d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1978

Neither a circuit court nor an appellate court may substitute its judgment for that of the administrative board. State v. Simmons, 299 S.W.2d 540, 542 (Mo.App. 1957). … In addition, the determination of the credibility of witnesses is a matter for the board. E.g., Bd. of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, supra, at 782; Lindsay v. Ford Motor Co., 548 S.W.2d 618, 619 (Mo.App.1977).

Burnison v. Sounders

225 Mo. App. 1159 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1931

This board was narrower and sjnaller than the other board in the step. The evidence shows that the front board was from a fourth to a half inch higher than the rear board. … However, it is claimed that the instruction assumes that “when persons stepped on such step the board or boards therein would spring and give down and that it further assumes that if the board or boards did spring and give

Veal v. Leimkuehler

267 S.W.2d 387 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1954

Badger Lumber Co. v. Goodrich, 353 Mo. 769 , 184 S.W.2d 435 ; City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank, 351 Mo. 688 , 173 S.W.2d 837 ; Crabtree v Ætna Life Ins. Co., 341 Mo. 1173 , 111 S.W.2d 103 . … Spotts v. Spotts, 331 Mo. 942 , 55 S.W.2d 984 ; Townsend v. Boatmen’s Nat. Bank, Mo.App., . 148 S.W.2d 85 ; State ex rel. Caplow v. Kirkwood, Mo. App., 117 S.W.2d 652 ; Hecht Bros. Clothing Co. v.