Case law

State v. Payne

600 S.W.2d 94 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1980

They saw the defendant leaning into a brown vehicle. … As the United States Supreme Court stated in McGautha v.

Missouri Department of Corrections v. Cheeney

926 S.W.2d 939 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1996

Prenger v. Moody, 845 S.W.2d 68, 73 (Mo.App.1992). Evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the agency’s decision. Id. … reasons, or not for the good of the service.” § 36.390.5, RSMo 1994; Campbell v.

McNeal v. Bequette

571 S.W.2d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1978

Neither a circuit court nor an appellate court may substitute its judgment for that of the administrative board. State v. Simmons, 299 S.W.2d 540, 542 (Mo.App. 1957). … In addition, the determination of the credibility of witnesses is a matter for the board. E.g., Bd. of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, supra, at 782; Lindsay v. Ford Motor Co., 548 S.W.2d 618, 619 (Mo.App.1977).

Antoine v. McCaffery

335 S.W.2d 474 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 1960

Stegmann v. Weeke, 279 Mo. 131 , 214 S.W. 134 , State ex rel. Brokaw v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, Mo.App., 171 S.W.2d 75 ; compare Dolan et al. v. … Meyer v.

McGraw v. Andes

978 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1998

Brown v. Lanrich, *802 Inc., 950 S.W.2d 285, 237 (Mo.App.1997). No abuse of discretion will be found where substantial evidence exists to support a verdict in the moving party’s favor. Robertson v. Cameron Mut. Ins. … In Scott v.

State Ex Rel. Rawlings v. Kansas City

213 Mo. App. 349 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1923

Clair v. People, 85 Ill. 396 ; Kelly v. City of Chicago, 62 Ill. 279 ; People v. Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180 ; City of Chicago v. People, 114 Ill. App. 145 -155.” (locus citatus, p. 154).] … Maroney, 191 Mo. 531 ; State ex rel. v. Board, 95 Ohio St. 276 , 287; State ex rel. v. Sullivan, 58 Ohio St. 504 .] See, also, on both features of the above contentions, Gregory v.

Robert Dungan v. Fuqua Homes, Inc.

437 S.W.3d 807 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 27, 2014

In Bryan v. … We also find Brown v. Ozark Christian Schools of Neosho, 847 S.W.2d 888 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993), helpful to our analysis of the issue presented in this case.

Chasnoff v. Mokwa

415 S.W.3d 152 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 2013

In Garrity v. … Ishmon et al. v. Board of Police Commissioners, et al., Cause No. 1122-CC01598. . As the Supreme Court did in Brooks v.

417 Pet Sitting, LLC v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2020

Gateway Taxi Mgmt. v. Div. of Emp't Sec., 461 S.W.3d 830, 832 (Mo. banc 2015) (quoting Mo. Const. art. V, section 18). … V, section 18.

State of Missouri v. Ezra J. Smith

504 S.W.3d 894 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 2016

See State v. Brown, 457 S.W.3d 772, 784 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014); State v. Johnson, 461 S.W.3d 842, 844 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015). … In State v.

Laubinger v. Laubinger

5 S.W.3d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

Larocca v. State Bd. of Registration for the Healing Arts, 897 S.W.2d 37, 43 (Mo.App.1995) (citing Moore v. Board of Educ., 836 S.W.2d 943, 947 (Mo. banc 1992)). … Browning v. Browning, 947 S.W.2d 106, 111-12 (Mo.App. 1997).

Hilke v. Firemen's Retirement System of St. Louis

441 S.W.2d 730 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1969

(Davis v. Long, Mo. App., 360 S.W.2d 307 [9].) Although Exhibits 1 and 2 were treated informally, each was treated by the parties as part of the record to be considered by the Board. … (Civil Rule 83.05(a) and (e), V.A.M.R.; Ragan v. Ragan, Mo.App., 315 S.W.2d 142 [6,7].)

City of Dardenne Prairie v. Adams Concrete & Masonry, LLC

529 S.W.3d 12 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 2017

Rauch Lumber Co. v. Medallion Dev. Corp., 808 S.W.2d 10, 12 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991) (citing Sayers v. Bagcraft Corp. of Am., Inc., 597 S.W.2d 280, 282 (Mo. App. S.D. 1980)). … Under Section 432.070, the Board’s approval must sufficiently identify the subject matter under consideration with reasonable exactitude and specificity. State Highway Comm’n v.

State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Fajen

570 S.W.2d 765 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1978

Appellant cites Burke v. Colley, 495 S.W.2d 699 (Mo.App.1973), and Klinhart v. … Appellant also cites cases, e. g., Armstrong v. City of Monett, 228 S.W. 771 (Mo.1921), to the effect that testimony of a layman such as Mr. Brown has no probative value on matters requiring scientific proof.

Missouri Retired Teachers Foundation v. Estes

323 S.W.3d 100 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2010

Co., Inc. v. Schneider, 646 S.W.2d 759, 762 (Mo. banc 1983). … Kansas Power & Light Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 770 S.W.2d 740, 742 (Mo.App. W.D.1989) (quoting Buechner v. Bond, 650 S.W.2d 611, 614 (Mo. banc 1983)).

Hartog v. Siegler

615 S.W.2d 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1981

State Park Board v. Tate, 365 Mo. 1213 , 295 S.W.2d 167, 168 [3], 59 A.L.R.2d 933 (banc 1956). … Brown v. Brown, 495 S.W.2d 89, 92 [1] (Mo.App.1973). That is not the case here; the award does not shock our sense of justice, and we rule this point against appellants. Judgment affirmed.

State ex rel. Kiely v. Schmidli

583 S.W.2d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1979

State v. Hawkins, 337 S.W.2d 441, 443 (Mo.App.1960). … Public Service Commission of Missouri v. Missouri Pac. R.

Steven Earl v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 2021

Brown v. State, 602 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2020). … We thus follow this Court’s decisions in Lampkin v. State, 560 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018); Barber v. State, 569 S.W.3d 556 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019); and Brown v. State, 602 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. App.

Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp. v. 66 Drive-In, Inc.

812 S.W.2d 903 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1991

Again, unless it appears that the conclusion of the Board is clearly arbitrary, we cannot substitute our opinion for that of the Board. Allright Missouri v. … In Schweig v.

John Chasnoff, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Col. Joseph Mokwa, Wendell Ishmon v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, and John Chasnoff, Intervenor Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 2015