Case law

David P. Oetting v. City of Ladue

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2025

Standard of Review This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Board rather than the circuit court’s judgment. Antioch Cmty. Church v. … Teefey v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 24 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Mo. banc 2000)).

Sulltrop v. Sulltrop

655 S.W.2d 850 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983

Wilkie v. Elmore, 395 S.W.2d 168, 172 (Mo.1965). Judgments in court tried cases, such as this one, are presumed to be correct. Moreover, we must defer to the trial court’s finding of credibility. Wingate v. … Executive Jet Management, Etc. v. Scott, 629 S.W.2d 598, 610 (Mo.App.1981).

Lassen v. State

717 S.W.2d 538 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1986

State v. Brown, 690 S.W.2d 161, 163 (Mo.App.1985). … See e.g., Brown, supra; State v. Burke, 684 S.W.2d 871 (Mo.App.1984). Judgment affirmed. CROW, C.J., GREENE, P.J., and TITUS, J., concur.

C.L.B. v. Greene Cnty. Juvenile Office (In re Interest of C.E.B.)

565 S.W.3d 207 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 2018

J.A.R. v. D.G.R. , 426 S.W.3d 624 , 630 (Mo. banc 2014). … Id . at 645-46 ; see Jones v. Jones , 536 S.W.3d 383 , 385 (Mo App. 2018).

Davis v. Missouri Division of Family Services

907 S.W.2d 280 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1995

Brown v. Van Noy, 879 S.W.2d 667, 671 (Mo.App.1994). Rather, appellate courts determine on appeal whether the record contains sufficient evidence to support the verdict. Id. … The first appeal is an administrative review by the child abuse and neglect review board established by § 210.153 RSMo 1994.

Davis v. Long

360 S.W.2d 307 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1962

This court has ruled on this point adversely to the board in Scism v. Long et al., Mo.App., 280 S.W.2d 481 , where it was held that a St. … Sherwood Bros., Inc. v. District of Columbia, 72 App.D.C. 155 , 113 F.2d 162, 165 (4); Albertson v.

State v. Greenlaw

593 S.W.2d 641 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1980

The victims promptly identified him as the man in the brown or red jacket. These identifications were based upon both clothing and appearance. … See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); State v. Jackson, 519 S.W.2d 551 (Mo.App.1975) [11-13].

Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Springfield

817 S.W.2d 611 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1991

In Jones v. St. … Comm., 770 S.W.2d 296 (Mo.App.1989); and Brown v. Missouri Highway and Trans. Comm., 805 S.W.2d 274 (Mo.App.1991). 2 However, the plaintiffs’ reliance on these “defective road design” cases is misplaced.

State Ex Rel. C. C. G. Management Corp. v. City of Overland

624 S.W.2d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1981

Moore v. Board of Education of the Special School District of St. Louis County, 547 S.W.2d 188, 191 (Mo.App.1977). … Moore v. Board of Education of the Special School District of St. Louis County, supra at 191.

Lee v. Jamison

338 S.W.3d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2011

On 2 July 2009, the Board passed a resolution purporting to remove Lee as a director. Lee filed for a writ of prohibition, alleging that the means used to remove him were illegal. Robert Lee v. … Griffin v. Belt, 941 S.W.2d 570, 572 (Mo.App. W.D.1997).

Shaw v. State

686 S.W.2d 513 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1985

Brown v. State, 485 S.W.2d 424, 428 (Mo.1972). … Brown, 485 S.W.2d at 428 . Later Missouri decisions have affirmed the rule that “[a] motion for an order for mental examination may be made at any time before sentencing ....” State v.

State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. Travers

600 S.W.2d 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1980

Voss v. … Rutter v. Carothers, 223 Mo. 631 , 122 S.W. 1056 (1909).

Petty v. Boeving

216 Mo. App. 271 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1924

The hole was left there by the manufacturers of the machine for the purpose of taking out and putting in what are known as vibrator boards, which are placed directly behind the saws and under the brush pulley, which vibrators … The cases to which we refer are: Edwards v. Morehouse Stave & Mfg. Co., 221 S. W. l. c. 747; Hughes v. Marshall Const. Co., 176 *279 S. W. 534; Wagner v. Gilsonite Const. Co., 220 S. W. l. c. 897; Brown v John M.

State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Schade

271 S.W.2d 196 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1954

Louis County south of Natural Bridge Road, angularly divided on the west by Brown Road. … Plaintiff condemned twenty feet along the property’s northern boundary east of Brown Road and ten feet west of Brown Road, and one hundred feet somewhat south of there to widen Natural Bridge Road and make it a dual highway

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Gibson

421 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1967

As I recall, he worked at Brown Shoe Company. … Thomson v.

State v. Peterson

525 S.W.2d 599 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1975

The contents of the brown paper sack, the purse, and two cigarette butts and the brown leaf with the stem on it tacked above defendant’s bed were seized by Piburn and removed from the home. … Chimel v.

State v. Barkwell

590 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1979

The acquaintanceship proved financially disastrous for Miss Brown. … In State v.

Laubinger v. Laubinger

5 S.W.3d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

Larocca v. State Bd. of Registration for the Healing Arts, 897 S.W.2d 37, 43 (Mo.App.1995) (citing Moore v. Board of Educ., 836 S.W.2d 943, 947 (Mo. banc 1992)). … Browning v. Browning, 947 S.W.2d 106, 111-12 (Mo.App. 1997).

Aaron Stock v. Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement Fund of the City of Richmond Heights, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2025

Hartle v. Ozark Cable Contracting, 291 S.W.3d 814, 817 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009); see also Callahan v. … Harvey v. Washington, 95 S.W.3d 93, 96 (Mo. 2003) (quoting Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hosp., 863 S.W.2d 852, 862 (Mo. 1993)); see also, e.g., Hensley v.

State ex rel. Kendall v. Wilson

151 Mo. App. 719 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1910

may remove from office, for cause shown, any elective officer, such officer being first given opportunity to be heard before the board sitting as a board of impeachment. … [State ex rel. v. Maroney, 191 Mo. 532 , 90 S. W. 141 ;. Dillon on Municipal Corporations, vol. 1, sec. 250, 4 Ed.; People v. New York, 82 N. Y. 491 .]