Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.20s
State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Blanc
548 S.W.3d 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2018
Griffin v. Belt , 941 S.W.2d 570 , 572 (Mo. App. … Comm'n v. Waters , 370 S.W.3d 592 , 598 (Mo. banc 2012) ; see also State ex rel. Praxair, Inc. v. Mo. Pub. Serv.
Cited 2 timesPublished679 S.W.2d 384 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1984
He further argues that he had no notice of the entry of the formal judgment as required by Rule 75.01 and cases such as Byrd v. Brown, 613 S.W.2d 695 (Mo.App.1981). … Brown. Based on this hearsay evidence, Dr. Brown stated certain conclusions. and suggestions. The transcript does not support this argument. Dr.
Cited 9 timesPublished356 S.W.2d 713 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1962
.; Hudson v. Jones, Mo.App. 278 S.W.2d 799 ; Montgomery v. Getty, supra. … In State v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBuss v. Allison Window Glass Co.
146 Mo. App. 71 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1909
[Compton v. Parsons, 76 Mo. 455 ; Murphy v. Gay, 37 Mo. 535 ; Keystone Implement Co. v. Leonard, 40 Mo. App. 477 ; Kerr v. Haymaker, 20 Mo. App. 350 ; Barr v. Baker, 9 Mo. 840 .] … [Brown v. Weldon, 99 Mo. 564 ; Keystone Implement Co. v. Leonard, 40 Mo. App. 477 .] It is the principle last referred to which plaintiff sought to invoke in the third instruction which was refused by the court.
Cited 3 timesPublished280 S.W.2d 481 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1955
The Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis is created by an Act of the General Assembly, Chapter 84 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., hence is a body created by law. State ex rel. Murphy v. … McKittrick v. Wilson, 350 Mo. 486 , 166 S.W.2d 499 , 143 A.L.R. 1465 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedMissouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2025
Hay v. Schwartz, 982 S.W.2d 295, 301 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998) (citing Knapp v. Mo. Local Gov’t Emps. Ret. Sys., 738 S.W.2d 903, 912 (Mo. App. W.D. 1987)); see also Byous v. Mo. Local Gov’t Emps. Ret. Sys. … See, e.g., Obermann v. Treasurer of State, 681 S.W.3d 559, 564- 65 (Mo. App. E.D. 2023); Hazeltine v. Second Injury Fund, 591 S.W.3d 45, 64-65 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019); Abt v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Office of Public Counsel v. Public Service Commission
326 S.W.3d 868 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2010
Brown v. Wheatley, 306 S.W.3d 664, 665 (Mo.App. S.D.2010). Nonetheless, we have elected to exercise our discretion to entertain OPC’s appeal, as we are able to discern the nature of the issues raised by OPC on appeal. … Board of Prob. & Parole, 299 S.W.3d 33 , 36 (Mo.App. W.D.2009).
Cited 2 timesPublished410 S.W.3d 767 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2013
Ashby Road Partners, LLC v. … This court notes that both the City and the Board respond to Plaintiffs’ arguments by citing Monell v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedContour Chair Lounge Co. v. Aljean Furniture Manufacturing Co.
403 S.W.2d 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1966
Royster v. Baker, Mo., 365 S.W.2d 496 ; Rosen v. Alside, Inc., Mo., 248 S.W.2d 638 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 . … Royster v. Baker, supra; Kansas City v. Rathford, 353 Mo. 1130 , 186 S.W.2d 570 ; Medich v. Stippec, 335 Mo. 796 , 73 S.W.2d 998 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedFoudry v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad
130 Mo. App. 104 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1908
W. 796 ; Corby v. Id., 150 Mo. 457 , 52 S. W. 282 ; Ruckert v. Id., 163 Mo. 260 , 63 S. W. 814 ; Nagel v. Id., 167 Mo. 89 , 66 S. W. 1090 , and Heer D. G. Co. v. Citizens Railway Co., 41 Mo. App. 63 . We find in Tate v. … [Brown v. Railroad, supra.]
Cited 2 timesPublishedFarley v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks & Recreation
592 S.W.2d 539 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1979
In 1968 the Missouri State Park Board purchased the property as an addition to the park and requested that plaintiff quit operating the pinball machines under threat of termination of the lease and eviction from the premises … Harris Music Publishing Co., 255 F.2d 518 (2d Cir. 1958); Raspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering & Mach., 575 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1978); Cooke v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWestern Commercial Travelers Ass'n v. Tennent
128 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1907
[Brown v. Brown’s Admr., 68 Mo. 388 ; Whitehead v. Tapp, 69 Mo. 415 .] Louisa H. Tennent was living with her husband as a member of his family. … In Duval v.
Cited 9 timesPublished139 Mo. App. 339 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1909
[Steinberg v. Insurance Co., 49 Mo. App. 255 ; Padley v. Catterlin, 64 Mo. App. l. c. 641; Schradski v. Albright, 93 Mo. 42 ; Kritzer *367 v. Smith, 21 Mo. 296 ; Charleston v. Hunt, 27 Mo. 34 ; State v. … [Ringer v. Holtzclaw, 112 Mo. 519 ; Kelley v. Thuey, 143 Mo. 422 ; Rucker v. Harrington, 52 Mo. App. 481 ; McKeag v. Piednor, 74 Mo. App. 593 ; Bruckman v. Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co., 91 Mo. App. 454 ; Biest v.
Cited 18 timesPublished652 S.W.2d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1983
Louis Board of Police Commissioners” in that name alone does not lie. American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners, 285 Mo. 581 , 227 S.W. 114 (Mo.1920). … Louis Board of Police Commissioners before the Court. While sovereign immunity attaches to the operation and maintenance of a police force, Carmelo v.
Cited 32 timesPublished546 S.W.2d 727 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1977
Bd. of Health v. … R-III v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedG&G Mech. Constructors, Inc. v. Jeff City Indus., Inc.
549 S.W.3d 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2018
Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 410 S.W.3d 623 , 640 (Mo. banc 2013) (citations omitted). … Brown v. Donham , 900 S.W.2d 630 , 632 (Mo. banc 1995).
Cited 6 timesPublishedState v. School Dist. No. 7, Lewis County
239 Mo. App. 1113 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1947
Parry v. Walser, 57 Mo. 169, 172 . … Miller v. Board of Education of Consolidated School Dist. No. 1 of Holt County, 224 Mo. App. 120 , 21 S. W. (2d) 645 ; State ex rel. Gehrig v. Medley, Mo. App., 28 S. W. (2d) 1040 , 1044.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJ. A. Ruhl Clothing Co. v. Singleton
161 Mo. App. 366 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1912
[Faust v. Koers, 111 Mo. App. 560 ; 86 S. W. 278 ; Tufts v. Morris, 87 Mo. App. 98 ; Glass Co. v. Friedlander, 84 Wis. 53 , 54 N. W. 28 ; Estey Organ Co. v. Lehman, 111 N. W. 1097 ; 11 L. R. A. (N. … W. 1051 ; Foster v. Rowley, 67 N. W. 1077 ; Brown v. Foster, 108 N. Y. 387 .] In Faust v.
Cited 4 timesPublished544 S.W.2d 48 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1976
That power allows the Board to pass ordinances to regulate the manner of impeachments and removals. The definition of manner was taken from Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2d Ed. in State ex rel. Stamm v. … Bishop v. Wood, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976).
Cited 18 timesPublishedAllstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
311 S.W.2d 41 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1958
Akins entered into negotiation with one Brown, the salesman in charge (Brown also happened to be Akins’s son-in-law), and the upshot was that Akins agreed to trade in his 1942 Ford, at an allowance of $100, to pay $127 in … Brown says no papers were delivered except possibly an invoice.
Cited 43 timesPublished
Ask Donna