Case law

Bussell v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad

125 Mo. App. 441 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1907

[Rattan v. Railroad, 120 Mo. App. 270 .] … [Whitehead v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 263 ; Hedrick v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 104 .]

Baumer v. City of Jennings

247 S.W.3d 105 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2008

Only where the board exceeds its authority should the reviewing court hold the board’s ruling to be illegal and void. Hutchens v. St. Louis County, 848 S.W.2d 616, 617 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). … Co., Inc. v. Rauls, 170 S.W.3d 47, 51 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). A board may consider the hearsay testimony of city staff members received without objection. State ex rel. Sander v.

Smith v. Kriska

113 S.W.3d 293 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2003

Schaffer v. Board of Educ. of St. Louis, 869 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Mo.App.1993); Brinley v. Karnes, 595 S.W.2d 465, 467 (Mo.App.1980). … Defendant asserted as an affirmative defense that the Agreement was not signed by the Board or by the Board’s lawful agent. Defendant, as the proponent of the affirmative defense, had the burden of proof. Warren v.

Patricia Faenger, Administrator, and Missouri Veterans Home at St. James, Missouri v. Bobby Petty

441 S.W.3d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2014

Veterans Home v. Brown, 374 S.W.3d 359, 365 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012). … Brown, 374 S.W.3d at 365.

Kansas City v. Roberts

411 S.W.2d 847 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1967

In Meredith v. Whillock, 173 Mo.App. 542 , 158 S.W. 1061, 1063 , it was held that the violation of a city ordinance is not admissible as proof *850 of the commission of a crime. To the same effect see Clawans v. … Daggs v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., (Mo.App.) 51 S.W.2d 164 , 167.

Tribune Publishing Co. v. Curators of the University of Missouri

661 S.W.2d 575 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983

As succinctly put in Edwards v. St. … Dravo Corporation v. Spradling, 515 S.W.2d 512, 517 (Mo.1974); and Hyde v. City of Columbia, 637 S.W.2d 251, 262-63 (Mo.App.1982).

Barnett v. La Societe Anonyme Turbomeca France

963 S.W.2d 639 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1997

Kilmer v. Browning, 806 S.W.2d 75, 81 (Mo. App.1991). … Kilmer v. Browning, 806 S.W.2d at 80 . 10 .

State v. Greathouse

519 S.W.2d 299 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1975

State v. Evans, 237 S.W.2d 149, 151 [1, 2] (Mo.1951); State v. Boothe, 485 S.W.2d 11, 14 [5, 6] (Mo. banc 1972). … State v. Wynne, supra, l.c., 182 S.W.2d 299 [7].

State Ex Rel. Walmar Investment Co. v. Mueller

512 S.W.2d 180 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1974

City of Pacific v. Ryan, 325 Mo. 373 , 28 S.W.2d 652, 655 [7,8] (1930); State ex rel. City of California v. Missouri Utilities Co., 339 Mo. 385 , 96 S.W.2d 607, 615 [14] (1936); Board of Public Works of Rolla v. … Adams v.

State ex rel. Zimmerman v. Blanc

548 S.W.3d 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2018

Griffin v. Belt , 941 S.W.2d 570 , 572 (Mo. App. … Comm'n v. Waters , 370 S.W.3d 592 , 598 (Mo. banc 2012) ; see also State ex rel. Praxair, Inc. v. Mo. Pub. Serv.

Kilventon v. United Missouri Bank

865 S.W.2d 741 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1993

Krause v. U.S. … MHTC awarded Brown Brothers the contract to construct a highway. Brown Brothers, in ton, hired Mountain Plains Construction, Inc., as a subcontractor to remove rock from the site.

State v. Callahan

641 S.W.2d 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1982

“She,” of course, was Joanna Brown. Ms. Brown was out of the state at the time of trial. … The prosecutor’s only basis for the asking of the question in the instant case was to put before the jury the ex parte statement by Joanna Brown. In Douglas v.

Gamache v. State

548 S.W.2d 594 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1977

State v. Gamache, Mo.App., 519 S.W.2d 34 (1975). … Brown, and let’s get along with the case. Q. (by Mr. Brown) All right. Were you convicted in California as a result of this incident occurring on May 13th, 1965, of assault and battery and sentenced to 40 days? A.

State of Missouri, ex rel. Jeremy Starr v. Board of Trustee for the Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2025

Hay v. Schwartz, 982 S.W.2d 295, 301 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998) (citing Knapp v. Mo. Local Gov’t Emps. Ret. Sys., 738 S.W.2d 903, 912 (Mo. App. W.D. 1987)); see also Byous v. Mo. Local Gov’t Emps. Ret. Sys. … See, e.g., Obermann v. Treasurer of State, 681 S.W.3d 559, 564- 65 (Mo. App. E.D. 2023); Hazeltine v. Second Injury Fund, 591 S.W.3d 45, 64-65 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019); Abt v.

Downing v. Howe

60 S.W.3d 646 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2001

Brown v. Beeney, 756 S.W.2d 940, 941 (Mo.App.1988). If an “authorized aftertrial motion” is timely filed, the period in which the trial court retains jurisdiction over the judgment is extended to 90 days. … VonSande, 858 S.W.2d at 236 ; see Tuffli v. Board of Education, 643 S.W.2d 296, 297 (Mo.App.1982).

Laswell v. Industrial Commission of Missouri, Division of Employment Security

534 S.W.2d 613 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1976

Reed v. Michigan Employment Security Com’n, 364 Mich. 395 , 110 N.W.2d 907, 908 (1961). Accord, Robinson v. … American Sugar Refining Co. v. Taylor, 115 So.2d 898 (La.App.1959), and Chrysler Corp. v. Review Board of Indiana Emp. Sec.

Green v. State

659 S.W.2d 219 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1983

Brown then noticed that they had been spotted by another attendant (attendant no. 2) and Brown proceeded outside after attendant no. 2. Movant then observed a wallet in the right shirt pocket of attendant no. 1. … See Young, supra; Byrd v. State, 577 S.W.2d 179 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Richardson, 460 S.W.2d 537 (Mo.banc 1970); and State v. Collett, 526 S.W.2d 920 (Mo.App.1975).

Herd v. Ingle

713 S.W.2d 887 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1986

Among the cases cited by the bank are Brown v. Maguire’s Real Estate Agency, 343 Mo. 336 , 121 S.W.2d 754 (1938), and Barsco, Inc. v. H.W.W., Inc., 346 So.2d 134 (Fla.App.1977). … In addition, even if Ralston cannot be distinguished, this court is bound by Brown v. Maguire’s Real Estate Agency, supra.

Smith v. King City School District R-1 of Gentry County

990 S.W.2d 643 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1998

C.F.S. v. Mahan, 934 S.W.2d 615 (Mo.App.1996); St. Louis Teachers Union v. St. Louis Bd. of Ed., 666 S.W.2d 25 (Mo.App.1984) (citations omitted). Therefore, the Board had a right not to renew Mr. … See generally, Crook v. Sheehan Enterprises, Inc., 740 S.W.2d 333, 337 (Mo.App.1987); Burnett v. Griffith, 769 S.W.2d 780, 788 (Mo.1989); Kawaauhau v.

Spencer v. Zobrist

323 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2010

In reviewing the Board’s decision, we must consider the entire record and not simply the evidence that supports the Board’s decision. Coffer v. Wasson-Hunt, 281 S.W.3d 308, 310 (Mo. banc 2009). … We, however, do not defer to the Board’s decision on questions of law. Vivona v. Zobrist, 290 S.W.3d 167, 171 (Mo.App.2009).