Case law

Moynihan v. City of Manchester

265 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 2008

Prichard, v. Ward, 305 S.W.2d 900, 901-02 (Mo.App.1957). … The individual acts of a board’s members, or the unofficial act of all its members, are of no force. See State ex rel Dussault v. Board of Adjustment, City of Maryland Heights, 901 S.W.2d 318, 320 (Mo.App.

Burley v. Menefee

129 Mo. App. 518 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1908

[Brown v. Railway, 99 Mo. 310 .] … What was said in the case of Gorham v.

The Parkview Vale, LLC and The Alma, LLC v. Board of Zoning Adjustment for the City of Kansas City, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2021

Church v. … Wennihan v. Wennihan, 452 S.W.3d 723, 728 (Mo. App. W.D. 2015).

Wright v. Kenney

746 S.W.2d 626 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1988

Bigg v. Hart, 255 S.W. 2d 778 (Mo.1953). However, a motion for a directed verdict is inappropriate in a court-tried case. Board of Public Utilities v. Fenton, 669 S.W.2d 612 (Mo.App.1984). … Marrs v. Marrs, 628 S.W.2d 950 (Mo.App.1982); Cave v. Cave, 593 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.App.1979); Moser v. Williams, 443 S.W.2d 212 (Mo.App.1969).

State v. Mays

598 S.W.2d 613 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1980

State v. Keeney, 425 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Mo.1968). … State v. Cook, supra, at p. 325; State v. Timmons, 574 S.W.2d 950, 956 (Mo.App. 1978).

Lombardo v. Lombardo

992 S.W.2d 919 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

v. … Brown v. Brown, 673 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Tex.App. — El.Paso 1984), lists two articles by Oldham which are cited as 20 J. Fam. L. 615 (1982), and 17 J.. Fam. L. 249 (1979). Brownaho lists cases from other jurisdictions.

State of Missouri v. Christopher D. Robertson

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2023

State v. Brown, 596 S.W.3d 193, 208 (Mo. App. W.D. 2020) (emphasis original). … See Brown, 596 S.W.3d at 208.

Gronoway v. Markham

232 Mo. App. 1118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1938

Brown and Jennings. “Q. Brown and Jennings? A. Yes, sir. “Q. Was that Brown this Brown that is a partner in Markham & Brown? A. Yes, sir. ‘ ‘ Q. He was there too ? A. Yes, sir. “Q. Well, did he say anything? A. … When, in conformity to the law as declared in the opinion in Greenfielder v. Whitte Hardware Co., 189 Mo. App. 577 , and the law as declared in the opinion in Hunicke v.

Harris v. State

766 S.W.2d 460 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1989

In Brown v. … See, Brown v. State, 619 S.W.2d 68 (Mo. banc 1981).

State v. Schnelle

7 S.W.3d 447 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1999

McGowan, 80 Cal.App. 293 , 251 P. 643 (1926); People v. Barthel, 231 Cal.App.2d 827 , 42 Cal.Rptr. 290 (1965); People v. Williams, 30 Cal.App.3d 502 , 106 Cal.Rptr. 324 (1973)). The Brown court discussed People v. … Brown, 649 S.W.2d at 344 (quoting McGowan, 251 P. at 645 ). Additionally, the Brown court looked at. People v.

Midwest Coal, LLC ex rel. Stanton v. Cabanas

378 S.W.3d 367 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2012

E.D.1998); Brown v. McIBS, Inc., 722 S.W.2d 387, 341 (Mo.App. E.D. 1986). … See, e.g., Ozark Employment Specialists v. Beeman, 80 S.W.3d 882, 897 (Mo.App. W.D.2002); Gesellschaft Fur Geratebau, 967 S.W.2d at 147 ; Brown, 722 S.W.2d at 341 .

Hyde v. City of Columbia

637 S.W.2d 251 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1982

The petition joined the reporters Brown and Potter, the newspapers Columbia Daily Tribune and Columbia Missourian and the City of Columbia as defendants. … . § 552 et seq., a prototype for such statutes, was given by the United States Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v.

State v. Bates

540 S.W.2d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1976

Likewise, the “automatic standing” rule of Jones v. United States, supra, was further refined and clarified in Brown v. … He, therefore, failed to meet the requirement (b) in Brown v. United States, supra.

Leslie v. Leslie

620 S.W.2d 48 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1981

In Teefey v. Teefey, 533 S.W.2d 563, 566 [3] (Mo. banc 1976) the court stated: “Criminal contempts are sometimes referred to as direct while civil contempts are described as constructive or indirect.” … Stanhope v. Pratt, 533 S.W.2d 567, 569-571 (Mo. banc 1976). . Nor did the judgment mention the affirmative defense raised by Leslie that due to illness he had not been able to make the payments.

Johnston v. Shoults

160 S.W.3d 440 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2005

Anderson v. Mantel, 49 S.W.3d 760, 763 (Mo.App.2001). … Brown and Delores Brown ("the Browns”) and, in turn, the Browns conveyed the properties to Johnston by general warranty deed dated September 25, 1997. 8 . The record reveals Glenda K.

Marriage of Pursifull v. Pursifull

781 S.W.2d 262 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1989

See RSMo § 452.330.1 (1986); Brown v. Brown, 664 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Mo.App., E.D.1984). … RSMo § 452.330 (1986); see also Mika 728 S.W.2d at 284 ; Brown 664 S.W.2d at 269 .

Browning v. City of St. Louis

384 S.W.2d 868 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1964

to plaintiff Lorraine Browning, and for plaintiff Lloyd Browning’s loss of his wife’s services and expenses incurred as a result of her injuries. … State Highway Commission v. Henderson, Mo.App., 381 S.W.2d 10 (13); Gerald v. Caterers, Inc., Mo.App., 382 S.W.2d 740 ; Gosnell v. Gosnell, Mo.App., 329 S.W.2d 230 (235). In Lott v.

Tuttle v. Director of Revenue

938 S.W.2d 317 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1997

The trial court based its order on Sergeant Brown’s failure to inform Mr. Tuttle that his license would be “immediately” revoked, citing Logan v. Director of Revenue, 906 S.W.2d 888 (Mo.App.1995). … Tuttle has failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by Sergeant Brown’s failure to state that his driving privileges would be immediately revoked, the trial court erred by granting relief to Mr. Tuttle. Sanchez v.

Bennett v. Gerk

230 Mo. App. 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1933

Louis was undoubtedly on interpleaders, Brown and Hamilton. They failed to meet this burden. [See Johannes v. Union Fuel Co. (Mo. App.), 199 S. W. 1032 ; Meux v. Hallex, 179 Mo. App. 466 , 162 S. W. 68 .] … [Hatch v. Mann, 15 N. Y.

Veal v. Leimkuehler

249 S.W.2d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1952

V, § 3. … V, § 3.