Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.25s

  • State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Perigo

    886 S.W.2d 149 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1994

    Louis v. Litz, 653 S.W.2d 703, 705 [2] (Mo.App.1983); Yeager v. Yeager, 622 S.W.2d 339, 341 [3] (Mo.App.1981). … Clothier v. Yeaman, 465 S.W.2d 632, 634 (Mo. banc 1971).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cochran v. Industrial Fuels & Resources, Inc.

    995 S.W.2d 489 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 1999

    Claimant’s physical condition was worsening, and he next saw Hal Brown, a medical physician and dermatologist, who subsequently ordered skin biopsies. … Points I, V, and the part of VI above quoted, are denied.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • M.H. v. Garcia

    385 S.W.3d 489 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 2012

    Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 146 (Mo.App. W.D.2007). Pro se appellants are not to be granted preferential treatment. Id. … , 211 S.W.3d at 147 (quoting Shumpert v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • L.M.K. v. D.E.K.

    685 S.W.2d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1985

    Brown v. Brown, 609 S.W.2d 223 (Mo.App.1980) [7]; Amber B. v. Leland S., 592 S.W.2d 201 (Mo.App.1979) [1]. … Brown v. Brown, supra, [7]. The absence of the presumptive father and a guardian ad litem for Stacey obviated development of evidence meeting that test.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Glastetter v. Director of Revenue

    37 S.W.3d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2001

    See Brown v. Director of Revenue, 34 S.W.3d 166, 173-74 (Mo.App. W.D.2000). … Brown, 34 S.W.3d at 174-75 . Our interpretation of section 577.041(1) is in accordance with the recent Western District opinion in Brown. 34 S.W.3d 166 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Olds v. St. Louis National Baseball Club

    232 Mo. App. 897 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1937

    Louis Browns, a member of the American League, to play games scheduled by that League to be played in St. Louis. … The case of Quinn et al. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Estate of Mays v. Browne

    197 Mo. App. 555 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1917

    Mays was the *559 stepmother of Martha V. Brown, of Ellen Benson (the mother of John M. Benson) and of "William J. Mays. … The *565 word “children,” as designating those of Martha V. Brown, is not intended to apply to the children of John M. Benson. Grammatically construed, it does not so read.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • West v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

    297 S.W.3d 648 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2009

    In Brown v. Director of Revenue, 164 S.W.3d 121 (Mo.App. … See Estate of Klaas v. Brown, 8 S.W.3d 906 , 908 (Mo.App. S.D. 2000).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hildebrand v. Ballard

    767 S.W.2d 62 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1989

    Brown that he had. He also denied having advised Mr. Brown to tell the defendant that he would have her arrested for failing to return the CDs. … Eissler v. Londoff, 677 S.W.2d 358, 360 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Werdehausen v. Union Electric Co.

    801 S.W.2d 358 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1990

    Plaintiff's evidence showed the wood fell from the scaffolding because the scaffolding had no toe boards. A toe board is a safety device nailed to a scaffold to prevent objects from falling off the scaffold. … Plaintiff cites Virgil v. Riss & Co., 241 S.W.2d 96, 99 (Mo.App.1951) and Brown v. Commerce Trust Co., 9 F.R.D. 317, 318 (W.D.Mo.1949).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Saale v. Alton Brick Company

    508 S.W.2d 243 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1974

    Schott was the acting president of both Alton Brick and Mueller Cartage, and served on the board of directors of each company. … Reed & Brown Hauling Company, 361 S.W.2d 57 (Mo.App.1962), where the employers specifically testified that they had an unrestricted right to fire the employee. See Shireman v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Fain

    679 S.W.2d 419 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1984

    State v. Lowrance, 619 S.W.2d 354 (Mo.App. 1981); State v. Clark, 607 S.W.2d 817 (Mo. App.1980); State v. Battle, 588 S.W.2d 65 (Mo.App.1979). … Evidently, the brown tote bag.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kerth v. Polestar Entertainment

    325 S.W.3d 373 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2010

    E.D.2001)(insufficient service); Shapiro v. Brown, 979 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Mo.App. E.D.1998)(same). And finally, courts have held judgments void due to lack of notice and as violations of due process. Simmons v. … Moore v. Board of Educ. of Fulton Public School No. 58, 836 S.W.2d 943, 947 (Mo. banc 1992). A cause of action — here a suit for damages — is a property right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. See Bosworth v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Mottl v. Missouri Lawyer Trust Account Foundation

    133 S.W.3d 142 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2004

    Following the decision in March 2003 in Brown v. … Brown, 538 U.S. at 239 , 123 S.Ct. 1406 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Berman v. Regna

    728 S.W.2d 285 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1987

    Brown v. Pritchett, 633 S.W.2d 294 (Mo.App.1982) [1]. It should first be noted that plaintiff’s evidence and trial theory varied considerably from her petition. … The owners hired Brown Termite Control to treat the infestation. That was done and Brown issued a five year renewable guarantee covering the treatment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Depriest v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

    779 S.W.2d 347 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1989

    Co. v. Crouch, 714 S.W.2d 827 (Mo. App.1986). … In Brown v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 384 (Mo. banc 1989), the court examined the theories of waiver and estoppel as applied to statements of defenses by insurers when denying coverage for claims.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sallee v. McMurry

    113 Mo. App. 253 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1905

    [Brown v. Smith, 113 Mo. App. 59 ; Goodson v. Embleton, 106 Mo. App. 77 , 80 S. W. 22 ; Real Estate Co. v. Ruhlman, 68 Mo. App. 503 ; Wright & Orison v. Brown, 68 Mo. App. 577 ; Reeves v. Vette, 62 Mo. … [Wright & Orison v. Brown, 68 Mo. App. 577 ; Brennan v. Roach, 47 Mo. App. 290 ; Jones v. Berry, 37 Mo. App. 125 ; Goff v. Gibson, 18 Mo. App. 1 .]

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • State v. Dunlap

    811 S.W.2d 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1991

    State v. … State v. Mitchell, 611 S.W.2d 223, 228 (Mo. banc 1981). Plain error is a matter of “manifest injustice” or “miscarriage of justice.” Rule 30.20; State v. Petary, 781 S.W.2d 534, 540 (Mo. banc 1989).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Youngman v. Doerhoff

    890 S.W.2d 330 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1994

    In Ross v. … See e.g., Ross v. Robb, supra; Kimble v. Worth County R-111 Bd. of Educ., 669 S.W.2d 949 (Mo.App.1984) (theft); Gerig v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Snelling & Snelling v. Niemeyer

    743 S.W.2d 897 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1988

    Central Missouri Paving Co. v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 575 S.W.2d 889, 892 (Mo.App., W.D.1978). And, the disqualification provision requires a strict construction. Brown v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 178 Pa.Super. 348 , 115 A.2d 791 (1955), interpreted an unemployment benefits statute very similar to Missouri’s.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.