Case law

Natkin & Co. v. Moore

433 S.W.2d 36 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

Brown, his co-worker and that, later in the day, he notified his foreman. The accident occurred on Friday. … Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp., 354 Mo. 711 , 190 S.W.2d 915, 918 , 161 A.L.R. 1454 (Supreme Court en banc). We do not pass upon the weight of the evidence.

Coalition to Preserve Education on the Westside v. School District of Kansas City

649 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1983

The state legislature in the exercise of its constitutional authority has given to the school board and the school board alone the right to make such decisions. Cf. Sumpter v. … Brown v. Childers, 254 S.W.2d 275 (Mo.App.1953).

Landree v. Warren

53 Mo. App. 442 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1893

Among the provisions in the will of the said Merideth Brown, which was duly probated, were the following: “I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Cynthia Brown, in lieu of her dower, the plantation on which we now … Sturges v. Botts, 24 Mo. App, 282; Hood v. Mather, 21 Mo. 308 ; Edmonston v.

State v. Vinson

854 S.W.2d 615 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1993

The United States Supreme Court, in Brown v. … Brown, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261 .

Cadmus v. St. Louis Bridge & Tunnel Co.

15 Mo. App. 86 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1884

Stillson v. Railroad Co., 67 Mo. 671. … Frick v. Railroad Co., 75 Mo. 595 ; Dwyer v. Railroad Co., 12 Mo. App. 597 ; Neier v. Railroad Co., 12 Mo. App. 25 ; s. c., 1b. 35.

Travis Poke v. Independence School District

Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 2021

Section 287.030.1 defines the word "employer" for purposes of Chapter 287 "to mean: . . . (2) The state, county, municipal corporation, township, school or road, drainage, swamp and levee districts, or school boards, board … Evans v. Brown Builders Elec.

Kramer v. May Lumber Company

432 S.W.2d 617 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1968

In Driver v. Anheuser, Mo.App., 397 S. … Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., 332 Mo. 1150 , 61 S.W.2d 328 ; Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 339 Mo. 63 , 95 S.W.2d 1173 .” In Zoeller v. Terminal Railroad Association of St.

State v. Brock

740 S.W.2d 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1987

State v. Boyd, 679 S.W.2d 325, 326 [2] (Mo.App.1984). … See also, State v. Howard, 714 S.W.2d 736, 738 [5] (Mo.App.1986).

State v. Saffold

639 S.W.2d 243 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1982

She noticed three cars on the lot: a Gremlin [the Leach vehicle], a brown Mercury and a white over blue car. The brown Mercury displayed a winged hood ornament. … [See, among others 1 Wigmore on Evidence § 41 (Third Edition 1940); State v. Ross, 602 S.W.2d 816, 818 [1] (Mo.App.1980); State v. Feger, 340 S.W.2d 716, 721 [3-5] (Mo.1960); State v.

Aboussie v. McBroom

421 S.W.2d 805 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1967

In *808 Couch v. St. … See, for example, State v. Crocker, Mo., 275 S.W.2d 293 [6, 7], and Kelly v. American Cent. Ins.

State ex rel. Young v. Elliott

565 S.W.3d 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2018

Mertens v. Brown , 198 S.W.3d 616 (Mo. banc 2006), the Missouri Supreme Court emphasized that, "[o]nce judgment and sentencing occur in a criminal proceeding, the trial court has exhausted its jurisdiction. … Valentine v. Orr , 366 S.W.3d 534 , 541 (Mo. banc 2012) ; State ex rel. Lovelace v. Mennemeyer , 421 S.W.3d 555 , 557 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014) ; State ex rel. Kizer v. Mennemeyer , 421 S.W.3d 558 (Mo. App.

Vinson v. Vinson

725 S.W.2d 121 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1987

Brown or that Brown was C_’s father. Plaintiff also said defendant “began to run garnishments on me when she moved out and left C_ in the house with me. … F_, 333 S.W.2d at 323; In re Marriage of Brown, 703 S.W.2d 59, 61 (Mo.App.1985).

In re the Marriage of Brown

703 S.W.2d 59 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1985

This court, in Brown v. Brown, 646 S.W.2d 888 (Mo.App.1983), affirmed, subject to minor modification, the legal separation decree. … S v. S, 490 S.W.2d 344, 349 (Mo.App.1973).

Taylor v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.

954 S.W.2d 496 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1997

Brown and Defendant (in its capacity as Mr. Brown’s insurer only). … Brown and Defendant (in its sole capacity as Mr. Brown’s insurer). Id.

State v. Morse

503 S.W.2d 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1973

Compare State v. Walker, supra; State v. Castaldi, 386 S.W.2d 392 (Mo.1965). … To the contrary, see State v. Brown, 462 S.W.2d 766 (Mo.1971). There, defendant was convicted of stealing a TV set from a motel room.

Jaros v. Jaros

395 S.W.2d 217 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1965

Merle Brown, a sister of Walter Wurtz. When plaintiff went to the Brown home to see defendant, and the door was opened by Mrs. Brown, he saw defendant inside the house. … Brown; that she had been at the Brown home at the time referred to by plaintiff and had stayed overnight at the home.

State v. Miller

208 S.W.3d 284 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2006

State v. Young, 701 S.W.2d 490, 496 (Mo.App. … A: Krista Brown [Defendant’s Girlfriend], Q: Okay. And what did police officers tell Krista Brown about this robbery? A: I’m not sure I understand your question. Q: Okay.

State v. Vaughn

132 Mo. App. 135 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1908

Brown, Foreman.” … [Meddis v. Kenney, 176 Mo. 200 , 75 S. W. 633 ; Ball v. Woolfolk, 175 Mo. 278 , 75 S. W. 410 ; Wall v. Holladay-Klotz Land & Lumber Co., Ib. 406, 75 S. W. 385 ; Rosenberger v. Railroad, 96 Mo. App. 504 , 70 S. W. 395 .]

Raskin v. City of St. Louis

87 S.W.3d 911 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 2002

The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision, and this appeal followed. II. DISCUSSION On appeal, we review the findings and conclusions of the Board, not the judgment of the circuit court. Arens v. City of St. … We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s findings and give the Board’s decision the benefit of reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the record. Eubanks v.

State v. Koetting

691 S.W.2d 328 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1985

First, relying on Brown v. … Even Brown recognizes some limits on the trial court’s duty to provide effective counsel. The court is not required to provide the defendant with the particular attorney he requests. Brown at 1170 .