Case law

State v. Powell

286 S.W.3d 843 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2009

State v. Norman, 178 S.W.3d 556, 560 (Mo.App.2005). … State v. Bennett, 201 S.W.3d 86, 88 (Mo.App.2006).

Prater v. Stubblefield

483 S.W.2d 669 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1972

However in Allen v. … . * * * ” And in Schmidt v.

Morice v. Nations

568 S.W.2d 805 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1978

Roman’s testimony was credible, was believed by the board, and was therefore “substantial” evidence. Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, 457. … The burden of proof at the board hearing was on the superintendent. Heidebur v. Parker, 505 S.W.2d 440 (Mo.App.1974); Moore v. Damos, 489 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Mo.App.1972). .

Klass v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

169 Mo. App. 617 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1913

Klass had been taken over to the Prospect avenue car and while she was being helped on board. For the reasons stated in the recent opm *623 ions of this court in Hooper v. Insurance Co., 166 Mo. App. 209 and Jewell v. … [Brown v. Railway, 31 Mo. App. l. c. 673; Cullar v. Railway, 84 Mo. App. 347 ; Furnish v. Railway, 102 Mo. 669 .]

Cleve L. Molette v. Darren Wilson

478 S.W.3d 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2015

Molette’s affidavit further alleged Wilson initiated a verbal encounter with Brown and Johnson, thrusted the car door open which hit Johnson, and grabbed ahold of Brown’s shirt. … V, §§ 3—4. lack of notice and a hearing deprived him of his due-process rights under both the US. Constitution and the Missouri Constitution.

Kueneke v. Jeggle

658 S.W.2d 516 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1983

Wintermann, 360 S.W.2d at 690 ; Fischer v. Browne, 586 S.W.2d 733, 737 (Mo.App.1979). … Gilliam v. Gohn, 303 S.W.2d 101, 107 (Mo.1957); Womack v. Callaway County, Mo., 159 S.W.2d 630 , 632 (1942); Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg. Co., 316 Mo. 1023, 1028 , 292 S.W. 1023, 1025 (1927).

Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. v. City of Poplar Bluff

427 S.W.3d 343 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2014

See Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 111 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). Such questions of law are reviewed de novo, with no deference to the trial court’s determination of law. Straub v. … See Smith v. City of Kansas City, 635 S.W.2d 78, 79 (Mo.App. W.D.1982); see also Session v. Director of Revenue, 417 S.W.3d 898, 903 (Mo.App.

Natkin & Co. v. Moore

433 S.W.2d 36 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

Brown, his co-worker and that, later in the day, he notified his foreman. The accident occurred on Friday. … Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp., 354 Mo. 711 , 190 S.W.2d 915, 918 , 161 A.L.R. 1454 (Supreme Court en banc). We do not pass upon the weight of the evidence.

Jonathan Lukefahr, ex ux. v. Carol Taylor, et ux.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2023

Appellants cite Brown v. … Brown, 106 Mo. 611, 17 S.W. at 641.

State v. Webster

754 S.W.2d 12 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1988

State v. Willis, 662 S.W.2d 252, 253 [1] (Mo. banc 1983). … State v. Brown, 665 S.W.2d 945, 958 [14] (Mo.App.1984). Judgment affirmed. DOWD and REINHARD, JJ., concur.

State v. Beck

436 S.W.3d 566 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2013

State v. Smith, 373 S.W.3d 502, 504 (Mo.App.S.D.2012). “Whether conduct violates the Fourth Amendment is an issue of law *568 that this Court reviews de novo.” State v. Brown, 332 S.W.3d 282, 285 (Mo.App.S.D.2011). … In support of its argument to the contrary, the State discusses State v. Pike, 162 S.W.3d 464 (Mo. banc 2005); State v. Brown, 332 S.W.3d 282 (Mo.App.S.D.2011); State v.

Fortner v. State

186 S.W.3d 910 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2006

Schmedeke v. State, 136 S.W.3d 532, 534 (Mo.App.2004). … Winfield, v. State, 93 S.W.3d 732, 739 (Mo. banc 2002). See also Bewley v. State, 151 S.W.3d 151, 154 (Mo.App.2004). This court defers to the motion court in matters of witness credibility. Wright v.

Haymaker & Crookshanks v. Adams & Son

61 Mo. App. 581 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1895

This is the rule as *586 announced by the supreme court in the recent case of Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 . The cases of Schaub v. Railroad, 306 Mo. 93 , and McGowan v. … We had occasion at this term, in the cases of Murphy v. Ins. Co., ante, p. 183, and McNees v. Ins.

State v. Watson

839 S.W.2d 611 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1992

Defendant testified that Hall had a brown paper bag prior to meeting with the victim and that Hall handed the victim the brown paper bag during their transaction. … State v. Hamilton, 791 S.W.2d 789, 795 (Mo.App.1990); State v. Johnson, 672 S.W.2d 160, 163 (Mo.App.1984).

State v. Davis

126 S.W.3d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2004

The State, however, argues that its interpretation of Ross is supported by the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 480 S.W.2d 839 (Mo.1972). … Brown and Maxie do not support the State’s position. The State also cites State v.

State v. Lewis

872 S.W.2d 653 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1994

Harry v. State, 800 S.W.2d 111, 115 (Mo.App.1990). Allegations in a post-conviction motion are not self-proving. Clemmons v. … State v. Anderson, 785 S.W.2d 596, 600 (Mo.App.1990). In the present case, Shavonne Brown did not testify at the evidentiary hearing.

Ward v. Deck

419 S.W.2d 286 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1967

used by Brown Derby as a package liquor store. … Smith v. 0.15 Acres of Land, etc., 3 Storey 372 , 53 Del. 372 , 169 A.2d 256, 258-259 [4,5]; Dawson v.

Edgington v. State

189 S.W.3d 703 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2006

Nixon v. Jaynes, 63 S.W.3d 210, 217-18 (Mo. banc 2001); Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721 , 726 n. 2 (Mo. banc 2002); Mansfield v. State, 187 S.W.3d 1 , 2 n. 1 (Mo.App.2006); Brown v. … Winfield v. State, 93 S.W.3d 732, 738-39 (Mo. banc 2002); see also Brown, 179 S.W.3d at 407 .

Caston v. Stafford

92 Mo. App. 182 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1902

Heim v. Vogel, 69 Mo. 529 ; Fitzgerald v. Barker, 70 Mo. 685 ; Ferry Co. v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 389 . The payment of the monthly dues on stock do not constitute payments on the loan (Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. … Wilson v. Martinez, 108 Fed. Rep. 705; Ass’n v. Reed, 93 N. Y. 475 ; Southern B. & L. Ass’n v. Anneston, 101 Ala. 582 .

Coalition to Preserve Education on the Westside v. School District of Kansas City

649 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1983

The state legislature in the exercise of its constitutional authority has given to the school board and the school board alone the right to make such decisions. Cf. Sumpter v. … Brown v. Childers, 254 S.W.2d 275 (Mo.App.1953).