Case law

Smith v. State

141 S.W.3d 108 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2004

Vann v. … In North Carolina v.

State v. Allen

829 S.W.2d 524 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1992

State v. Brown, 718 S.W.2d 493, 494 (Mo. banc 1986). We do not discern an abuse of discretion in this case. … When the judge’s poll came to Juror Brown, this exchange occurred: THE COURT: James Brown, is this your verdict? JUROR BROWN: With reservations. THE COURT: I beg your pardon? JUROR BROWN: With reservations.

Myers v. Commercial Bank

72 Mo. App. 4 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1897

Adams v. Darby, 28 Mo. 162 ; Purcell v. Allemong, 22 Gratt. 739 ; Murray v. Judd, 6 Cow. 484 ; Judd v. Smith, 3 Hun. 190 ; Harker v. Anderson, 21 Wend. 372 ; Sherman v. Comstock, 2 McLean, 19 ; Pollard v. … Brown, 57 Ind. 232 ; Tiedeman, Com. Paper, sec. 210.

Joshua Hackman v. State of Missouri

492 S.W.3d 669 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2016

v. … Brown, 67 S.W.3d at 711.

Mid-Missouri Mental Health Center v. Polston

995 S.W.2d 527 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1999

The Commission cited Brown v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 577 S.W.2d 90 (Mo.App.1978) in support of its decision. This appeal follows. … However, in approving the respondent for benefits, both the Commission and the tribunal relied on the holding in Brown v.

Wardin v. Quinn

324 S.W.2d 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1959

On September 12, 1956, she left Elders Nursing Home and came to respondent’s home and arranged for her lodging, board and care. … Baker v. Brown’s Estate, 365 Mo. 1159 , 294 S.W.2d 22 .

State v. Boone Retirement Center, Inc.

26 S.W.3d 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2000

State v. Thomas, 625 S.W.2d 115, 126 (Mo.1981). … Brown v. St. Mary’s Health Center, 713 S.W.2d 15, 18 (Mo.App.1986).

Westbay v. Milligan

74 Mo. App. 179 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1898

About one year thereafter Brown by some instrument, not shown in the evidence, turned over his stock in trade to A. V. Darroch to secure the bank of Monett and other creditors of Brown. . … Pugh v. Williamson, 61 Mo. App. 168 , and citations.

State v. Lundy

829 S.W.2d 54 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1992

Corporal Brown, through repeated computer checks, determined that no driver’s license had been issued to Mantle by the state of Indiana. Corporal Brown also asked Mantle who owned the automobile. … Swearingin, 564 S.W.2d 351, 354-355 (Mo.App.1978), citing Commonwealth v. Brown, 473 Pa. 458 , 375 A.2d 331, 334 (1977). (Emphasis in original.) Also see Annot., Res Judicata —Criminal Cases, 9 A.L.R.3d 203 (1966).

State v. Pollock

603 S.W.2d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1980

Brown v. Illinois, supra, l. c., 422 U.S. 603 -604, 95 S.Ct. 2261 . … [Brown v.

Moore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

381 S.W.2d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1964

Oscar Brown, as notary public, purported to take the acknowledgment on the assignment. … Oscar Brown, as notary public, again purported to take the acknowledgment on the reassignment which was signed “Proctor & Brown Used Cars — By Waldo Proctor (Partner).”

Lake Ozark-Osage Beach Joint Sewer Board v. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Land Reclamation Commission and Magruder Limestone Co., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2016

following our remand in Lake Ozark/Osage Beach Joint Sewer Board v. … Albanna v.

Marquez v. Marquez

136 S.W.3d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

Brown, and the judgment entered by the court reflected that agreement. … Brown regarding domestic violence by Wife against the children.

In the Estate of Johnson

803 S.W.2d 619 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1990

This was also Brown’s opinion when he drafted the will, although Brown did not communicate his opinion to testator at that time. … Schupbach v. Schupbach, 760 S.W.2d 918, 923 (Mo.App.1988).

Lux v. Milwaukee Mechanics Insurance

221 Mo. App. 999 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1927

W. 684 , and in Brown v. Insurance Co., 184 S. W. 122 . It was held in Stubbins v. Insurance Co., 229 S. … [O’Keefe v. Ins. Co., 140 Mo. 558 . 564, 41 S. W. 922, 923 ; Stevens v. Ins. Co., 120 Mo. App. 88, 101 , 96 S. W. 684, 688 ; Brown v. Ins. Co., 184 S. W. 122 , 123; Stubbins v. Ins. Co., 229 S. W. 407 , 408.]

Martz v. Martz

323 S.W.3d 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 2010

Brown v. Mustion, 884 S.W.2d 365, 369 (Mo.App. S.D.1994). A party’s own testimony is sufficient to sustain an award on matters like child support and past necessary expenses — no expert testimony is required. DeCapo v. … In Lay v.

Jackson v. State

672 S.W.2d 367 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 15, 1984

Movant maintains that a second individual, Eddie Brown, should have been called to verify Ethel Patrick’s testimony. … Absent proof that the testimony of Eddie Brown could have been beneficial there is no showing of prejudice for failure to investigate or call him as a witness. Jones v. State, 600 S.W.2d 189, 191 (Mo.App.1980).

Hines v. Conston of Missouri 852

857 S.W.2d 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1993

Claimant argues the proper legal test for permanent total disability is set forth in Brown v. Treasurer of Missouri, 795 S.W.2d 479 (Mo.App.1990). … The test in Fischer is virtually identical to the test in Brown. Fischer and Brown were decided by the same division of this court within a period of three months. Both cases relied on Patchin v.

Watkins v. Missouri Department of Corrections

349 S.W.3d 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2011

On appeal, he claims the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) improperly treated his unclassified rape conviction as a class A felony for purposes of calculating his parole eligibility … Phillips v. Mo. Dep’t of *427 Corr., 323 S.W.3d 790, 793 (Mo.App.2010); Stone v. Mo. Dep’t of Corr., Prob. & Parole Bd., 313 S.W.3d 158, 161 (Mo.App.2010); State v. Dean, 898 S.W.2d 704, 706-07 (Mo.App.1995).

State v. Potter

560 S.W.2d 29 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1977

In their briefs, both parties cite State v. … State v.