Case law

Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. South Side Bank

224 Mo. App. 876 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1930

[Buckley v. Bank, 35 N.J. Law, 400, 10 Am. Rep. 249 ; Farmer v. Bank, 100 Tenn. 187 , 47 S.W. 234 ; Knoxville Water Co. v. Bank. 123 Tenn. 364 , 131 S.W. 447 ; Talbot v. Bank, 1 Hill (N.Y.) 295; Johnson v. … Bank, 6 Hun (N.Y.) 124; Graves v. Bank, 17 N.Y. 205 ; Indiana National Bank v. Holtsclaw, 98 Ind. 85 ; Shaffer v. McKee, 19 Ohio St. 526 ; Cement Co. v.

State v. Silvey

980 S.W.2d 103 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1998

In State v. … The statutory provision at issue in Brown was § 568.060.1(a), RSMo 1978, which is identical to § 568.060.1(1), RSMo 1994.

Schamel v. St. Louis Arena Corporation

324 S.W.2d 375 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1959

brown shirt. … In Hughes v. St.

Curtis v. Browne

63 Mo. App. 431 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1895

Lippold v. Held, 58 Mo. 213 ; Thornton v. Irwin, 43 Mo. 153 ; McDonald v. Hulse, 16 *439 Mo. 503; Ralston v. Wood, 15 Ill. 171 ; Flower v. Ellwood, 66 Ill. 439 . … Iowa Co. v. Foster, 49 Iowa, 676 ; Hardin v. Bauer, 25 Iowa, 364; Sloan v. Rice, 41 Iowa, 465 ; Taft v. Boyd, 13 Allen, 84 ; Hawkes v. Ins. Co., 11 Wis. 188 ; Ralston v. Wood, 15 Ill. 158 .

Polavarapu v. General Motors Corp.

897 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1995

Wes Norton, Employer’s board certified industrial hygienist, also testified. … Bradshaw v. Brown Shoe Co., 660 S.W.2d 390 (Mo.App.1983). In a letter to Employer’s attorney dated April 18, 1990, more than two years prior to the hearing, Dr.

Griffin v. Evans Electrical Construction Co.

529 S.W.2d 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1975

The function of the court is to determine whether the Commission’s findings, if supported by competent and substantial evidence, are contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. * * * ” See also: Brown v. … In the case of Wigham v.

State of Missouri v. Timothy Wolf

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2020

State v. Paden, 533 S.W.3d 731, 738 (Mo. App. W.D. 2017); State v. Onate, 398 S.W.3d 102, 106 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013)(citing Brown v. … Fite v. Johnson, 530 S.W.3d 508, 510 (Mo. banc 2017) (citing Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 730 n.5) (“Rule 29.07(d) does not apply to claims enumerated within Rule 24.035.”).

Lewis v. Mason

561 S.W.3d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2018

Similarly, in Brown v. … (citations omitted); Brown v. Carter , 52 Mo. 46 , 48 (1873) ("This action can be maintained only where the plaintiff is in the possession of the close at the time of the commission of the trespass.

Cleveland Village School District No. 118 v. Zion

195 Mo. App. 299 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1916

[Rice v. McClelland, 58 Mo. 116 ; School Dist. v. Sims, 186 S. W. 4 ; District 6 v. District 5 of Henry county, 18 Mo. App. 266 .] … [Abler v. School District of St. Joseph, 141 Mo. App. 189, 197 .]. As said in District v. District, 18 Mo.

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. JERRY RAY GILLUM

574 S.W.3d 766 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2019

State v. Kopp, 325 S.W.3d 466, 468 (Mo. App. S.D. 2010) (quoting State v. Breese, 250 S.W.3d 413, 420 (Mo. App. S.D. 2008)). … Both Deputy Pratt and Sarah Brown, a criminalist with the Drug Chemistry Section of the Missouri State Highway Patrol Crime Lab (“criminalist Brown”), testified that a small amount of liquid substance or residue was visible

Geitz v. State

87 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2002

Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 723 (Mo. banc 2002). … Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 727 ; see also Logan v. State, 22 S.W.3d 783, 784 (Mo.App.2000).

Joffe v. Beatrice Foods Co.

341 S.W.2d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1960

Pitts v. Garner, Mo.Sup., 321 S.W.2d 509 ; Nydegger v. Mason, Mo.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 816 . … Motor Vehicles § 317, pp. 733, 735, Faught v. Washam, supra; Pitt v. Garner, supra. Both Brown and Crisp testified they did not apprehend danger until the approximate moment the Ford skidded into the south lane.

State v. Norman

145 S.W.3d 912 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 2004

State v. Brown, 97 S.W.3d 97, 101 (Mo.App. W.D.2002); Boyd v. State, 86 S.W.3d 153, 159 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). … State v. Brown, 958 S.W.2d 574, 580 (Mo.App. W.D.1997).

State v. Hurley

208 S.W.3d 291 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2006

See State v. Bradley, 57 S.W.3d 335, 339 (Mo.App. S.D.2001) and State v. Collis, 849 S.W.2d 660, 665 (Mo.App. W.D.1993). … Hancock v. Shook, 100 S.W.3d 786, 795 (Mo. banc 2003). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing L.C.’s rebuttal testimony. Mr. Brown and Ms.

Talley v. Runny Meade Estates, Ltd.

831 S.W.2d 692 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1992

Matzker v. St. … Bradshaw v. Brown Shoe Co., 660 S.W.2d 390, 394 (Mo.App.S.D.1983). Here, the Commission found that claimant was permanently and totally disabled.

Mulligan v. Crescent Plumbing Supply Co.

845 S.W.2d 589 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1992

Brown v. National Super Markets, Inc., 731 S.W.2d 291, 294 (Mo.App.1987) (Brown II). … Numerous cases prior and subsequent to the Brown decisions have discussed the violent crimes “special facts and circumstances” exception. In the consolidated cases of Madden v.

Conservative Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Warnecke

324 S.W.2d 471 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1959

Foley v. Euless, 214 Cal. 506 , 6 P.2d 956 . The court, in Cousins Inv. Co. v. … Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co., supra; Foley v. Euless, supra; Grass v. Big Creek Development Co., supra.

State v. Brunson

555 S.W.2d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1977

State v. Mitchell, supra, 491 S.W.2d l. c. 296[5] (Mo. banc 1973); State v. Williams, 492 S.W.2d 1, 4 [2] (Mo.App.1973). … State v. Miller, 485 S.W.2d 435, 441 [9] (Mo.1972); State v. Davis, 284 Mo. 695 , 225 S.W. 707, 709 [5] (1920); Chism v. Cowan, 425 S.W.2d 942, 948 [6] (Mo.1967).

Kersting v. White

107 Mo. App. 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 1904

“It is announced in Marks v. … In Olstead v.

State of Missouri at the Relation of: Laurie Lewis v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Platte County, Missouri and CKC Holdings, LLC.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2024

Church, 543 S.W.3d at 34 (quoting Mann v. Mann, 239 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Mo. App. 1951)). “Instead, we must view the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the zoning board.” Lynch v. … State v. Clark, 503 S.W.3d 235, 237 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016).