Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.32s
STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. THOMAS NATHANIEL TURRENTINE
524 S.W.3d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2016
Id. at 267 n.4. 5 The State also relies on State v. Brown, 457 S.W.3d 772, 783 (Mo.App. 2014), State v. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished639 S.W.2d 406 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1982
Nathaniel Brown, whom movant alleges is crucial to his alibi defense. The trial court found the rape took place between 10:15 and 10:30 a.m. on January 15, 1975. … Brown would have testified that he did not pick movant up from the institution until after 11:00 a.m. on the morning of the rape. Mr. Brown’s testimony, if believed, would establish the defense of alibi.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAmerican Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. David Browning and Kyle Himmelberg
Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 2021
Bd. v. Macon Cty. Comm’n, 485 S.W.3d 353, 355 (Mo. banc 2016). … Cook Tractor Co. v. Dir. of Revenue, 187 S.W.3d 870, 873 (Mo. banc 2006).
Cited 0 timesPublished586 S.W.2d 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1979
Ambruster v. Ambruster, supra; Harrellson v. Barks, supra; Cooper v. Freer, supra. … Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 (1941); Cox v. A. P. Green Fire Brick Co., 230 Mo.App. 774 , 75 S.W.2d 621 (1934); Glover v. Shirley, 169 Mo.App. 637 , 155 S.W. 878 (1913); Forbs v. St. Louis, I. M. & S.
Cited 14 timesPublished492 S.W.3d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2016
See, e.g., Strahler v. … Thomas v. Neill, 260 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Mo.App.E.D.2008); State ex rel. Tanner v. Nixon, 310 S.W.3d 727, 729 (Mo. App.W.D.2010); Joyce v. Baker, 141 S.W.3d 54, 56 (Mo.App.E.D.2004). Such was the case here.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCommerce Trust Co. v. Katz Drug Co.
552 S.W.2d 323 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1977
Brown fell. … Brown’s fall.
Cited 10 timesPublished562 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1978
In Preisler v. … Peerless Supply Company v. Industrial Plumbing and Heating Company, 460 S.W.2d 651 (Mo.1970); Emery v. Brown Shoe Company, 287 S.W.2d 761 (Mo.1956).
Cited 17 timesPublished603 S.W.2d 683 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1980
State v. Powell, 595 S.W.2d 13 (Mo.App.1979); State v. Brown, 584 S.W.2d 413 (Mo.App.1979). Furthermore, the issue is not truly preserved for appeal. … State v.
Cited 6 timesPublished397 S.W.2d 11 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1965
Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., 332 Mo. 1150 , 61 S.W.2d 328 ; Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 339 Mo. 63 , 95 S.W.2d 1173 . Addressing our remarks to that part of the testimony of Dr. … Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., supra; Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., supra; Vol. 32, Words and Phrases, Page 172.
Cited 6 timesPublished687 S.W.2d 592 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1985
State v. Cotton, 621 S.W.2d 296, 300 (Mo.App.1981). … State v. Nienaber, 347 Mo. 615 , 148 S.W.2d 1024, 1027 (1941); State v. Hamilton, 569 S.W.2d 350, 351, 352 (Mo.App.1978).
Cited 12 timesPublishedAntioch Community Church v. The Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City, Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 2016
Group v. Finke, 252 S.W.3d 227, 231 (Mo. App. … And, as such, the matter is consigned to the Board’s discretion; we 4 reverse for an abuse of discretion only. See State ex rel. Branum v.
Cited 0 timesPublished119 S.W.3d 558 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 2003
Rule 29.15(a) and (b); Brown v. State, 53 S.W.3d 160, 160-61 (Mo.App.2001). An untimely motion is a fatal defect which cannot be cured by an otherwise timely amended motion. Thomas v. … Brown, 53 S.W.3d at 161 ; State v. Myers, 997 S.W.2d 26, 36 (Mo.App.1999). In his brief, Movant recognizes these well-known principles of law.
Cited 7 timesPublished884 S.W.2d 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1994
State v. Franklin, 841 S.W.2d 639, 641 [3] (Mo. banc 1992) (citing United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 882 , 95 S.Ct. 2574, 2580 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975)). In United States v. … State v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedFerguson Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Ferguson
670 S.W.2d 921 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1984
Pollard v. Board of Police Commissioners, 665 S.W.2d 333 (Mo. banc 1984). … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).
Cited 28 timesPublishedMissouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2020
Coops., 497 S.W.3d at 915 (quoting Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 645). … (citing Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256, 165 S.W.2d 657, 663 (1942)).
Cited 0 timesPublished916 S.W.2d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1995
In Brown v. … Appellants claim that the facts in the petition are almost indistinguishable from those asserted in Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.1983), presumably because the company in Schacht also went insolvent.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDivision of Employment Security v. Smith
607 S.W.2d 829 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1980
McNary v. … Keitel v. Harris, 186 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.banc 1945); and Henry v. Manzella, 201 S.W.2d 457 (Mo.banc 1947).
Cited 0 timesPublished354 S.W.2d 296 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1962
Corp v. Joplin Cement Co. et al., Mo. en banc, 337 S.W.2d 252, 257 ; Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co., 336 Mo. 1000 , 82 S.W.2d 909 ; Rutherford v. Tobin Quarries, 336 Mo. 1171 , 82 S.W.2d 918 . … Corp v. Joplin Cement Co., supra, ( 337 S.W.2d 1 . c. 258); Brown v. Anthony Mfg. Co. et al., Mo., 311 S.W.2d 23, 27 ; Mo.Const., Art. V, § 22, V.A.M.S.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMissouri Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
811 S.W.2d 28 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1991
MIGA’s board of directors is subject to the supervision of the director of insurance. Section 375.785.5, RSMo 1986. … Brown v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 776 S.W.2d 384, 386 (Mo. banc 1989).
Cited 25 timesPublished555 S.W.2d 362 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1977
The capped man headed for the rear of the store premises to the vicinity of two parallel fences, one board and one wire. At about this time police arrived. … A dark brown stocking cap was found hanging on vegetation in the thicket. A search of the area revealed no unauthorized person but defendant on the premises.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna