Case law

Tobler's Flowers, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

632 S.W.2d 15 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1982

Joseph v. Howell, 607 S.W.2d 799 (Mo.App.1980); Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc., 607 S.W.2d 798 (Mo.App.1980); Brown v. Crow, 564 S.W.2d 599 (Mo.App.1978). The concurring opinion in Pennell v. … v.

Smith v. State

207 S.W.3d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2006

Officer Brown also testified. … Coday v. State, 179 S.W.3d 343, 352 (Mo.App.2005); see also Hill v.

State v. Watson

607 S.W.2d 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1980

State v. Hudson, 521 S.W.2d 43 (Mo.App.1975); State v. Cook, 557 S.W.2d 484 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Nevels, 571 S.W.2d 736 (Mo.App.1978); State v. Mills, 39 Or.App. 85 , 591 P.2d 396 (1979); Robinson v. … State v. Stenner, 591 S.W.2d 123 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Mayo, 559 S.W.2d 264 (Mo.App.1977). II.

Childers v. Holmes

95 Mo. App. 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1902

City of Independence v. Grates, 110 Mo. 374 ; Leach v. Cargill, 60 Mo. 316 ; Diggins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 ; Rentz v. Detroit, 48 Mich. 544 . … See also People v. Board of Improvement, 43 N. Y. 227 , and City of Independence v. Gates, 110 Mo. 374 .

Neel v. Strong

114 S.W.3d 272 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2003

Genevieve School District R-II v. Board of Aldermen of City of Ste. Genevieve, 66 S.W.3d 6, 10 (Mo. banc 2002). … State v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas, 66 S.W.3d 16 , 19 n. 2 (Mo. banc 2002).

CIT Group/Sales Financing Inc. v. Lark

906 S.W.2d 865 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1995

See also Union Electric Co. v. Fundways, Ltd, 886 S.W.2d 169, 170-71 (Mo.App.1994); W.E. Koehler Construction Co., Inc., v. Medical Center, 670 S.W.2d 558, 562 (Mo.App.1984); Carlson v. … Id.; Ezo v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co., 87 S.W.2d 1051 , 1053 (Mo.App.1935). See also Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 535 (8th Cir.1979) (applying Missouri law).

United States Postal Service v. Dallas County Appraisal District

857 S.W.2d 892 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1993

The United States Postal Service and ten of its lessors (collectively postal service) sued the Dallas County Appraisal District and the Dallas County Appraisal Review Board (collectively the appraisal district) over its taxation … Stafford v. Stafford, 726 S.W.2d 14, 16 (Tex.1987).

State v. Burnett

492 S.W.3d 646 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2016

State v. … State v. Johnson, 207 S.W.3d 24, 37 (Mo. banc 2006) (quoting State v. Williams, 97 S.W.3d 462, 472 (Mo. banc 2003)). Further, the fact that Brown was a corrections officer was not “inherently discriminatory.”

Myers v. City of Springfield

445 S.W.3d 608 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2014

Contrary to the lack of a direct or immediate interest in the underlying subject matter of the litigation, in Brown v. Wyrick, 626 S.W.2d 674 (Mo.App. W.D.1981), and Maries County Bank v. … In Brown , two Missouri inmates filed suit to change their legal names. Id. at 675 .

State v. Benson

703 S.W.2d 551 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1985

The dash board of the van had been damaged. The knobs had been removed from it and the stereo pushed back into the dash. It appeared someone had attempted to pry the stereo out of the dash. … State v. Lewis, 599 S.W.2d 94 (Mo.App.1980). “[O]n the authority of ... Brown v.

State v. Fletcher

758 S.W.2d 476 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1988

State v. Simone, 416 S.W.2d 96, 100 (Mo.1967). Also see State v. Yowell, 513 S.W.2d 397 (Mo. banc 1974). Moreover, the defendant’s point has nq substance. As stated, the defendant was related to Jerri Fletcher Brown. … State v. Casey, 683 S.W.2d 282, 285 (Mo.App.1984). The circumstances do not establish an abuse of discretion. Cf. State v. Oliver, 572 S.W.2d 440 (Mo. banc 1978). Also see State v.

Lauber-Clayton, LLC v. Novus Properties Co.

407 S.W.3d 612 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2013

Browne also developed and owned this shopping center. … Tinnon v. Mueller, 846 S.W.2d 752, 759 (Mo.App. E.D.1993); Singer v. Siedband, 138 S.W.3d 750, 754 (Mo.App. E.D.2004); Watson v. Watson, 562 S.W.2d 329 , 331 n. 2 (Mo.1978).

State ex rel. Nixon v. Continental Ventures Inc.

84 S.W.3d 114 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2002

In State v. … In Grabinski v.

State v. Suschank

595 S.W.2d 295 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1979

Fields bust and plaster board found in the closet. … State v. Ross, 371 S.W.2d 224, 225 (Mo.1963).

State v. Griffin

289 S.W.2d 455 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1956

State v. Magruder, Mo. App., 219 S.W. 700 ; State v. Brown, Mo. App., 293 S.W. 87 ; State v. Egan, Mo.App., 272 S.W.2d 719 . The defendant assigns as error the giving of an instruction designated, as No. 2. … State v. Spinks, 344 Mo. 105 , 125 S.W.2d 60 ; State v. «Gruber, Mo.Sup., 285 S-.W. 426; State v. Leonard, Mo.Sup., 182 S.W.2d 548 ; State v. Jackson, Mo.App., 220 S.W.2d 779 .

State v. McIntire

813 S.W.2d 97 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1991

In State v. … Brown, 750 S.W.2d 715 (Mo.App.1988). With commendable candor, defendant’s counsel recognizes that State v. Brown, 750 S.W.2d 139 , supra, is against his contention, but argues that “Brown is wrongly decided.”

Lassiter v. Martin

748 S.W.2d 819 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1988

Groves v. Hall, 628 S.W.2d at 421 . Procedurally, the record before us is similar to that considered in Brown v. General Motors Assembly Division, 695 S.W.2d 501 (Mo.App.1985). … In re Redemption Proceeding by Hokanson, 706 S.W.2d 569, 560 [1] (Mo.App.1986); Landers v. Smith, 379 S.W.2d 884, 887 [4] (Mo.App.1964). We must take the record as it comes to us. Board of Public Utilities v.

Woerheide v. Johnston

81 Mo. App. 193 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1899

Ass’ns, sec. 277, and cases cited; Davis v. West Saratoga Bldg. Union, 32 Md. 285 ; Jackson v. Meyers, 43 Md. 452 ; Bldg. Ass’n v. Bank, 79 Wis. 31 ; Jones v. Bldg. Ass’n, 94 Pa. St. 215; Hohenshell v. … Rogers v. *201 Hargo, 92 Term. 35; Post v. Ass’n, 97 Tenn. 408 ; Brown v. Arch, 62 Mo. App. 277 .”

Davis v. Wieland

557 S.W.3d 340 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2018

Schwartz was permissible under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Hamid , 856 S.W.2d 51 (Mo. banc 1993). … Hunter v. Moore , 486 S.W.3d 919 , 925 (Mo. banc 2016). With respect to Attorneys' contact with Dr. Schwartz, they argue the contact was permissible under the holding in Brown v.

Jackson v. St. Regis Apartments, Inc.

565 S.W.2d 178 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1978

See Jarvis v. Boatmen’s Nat’l Bank of St. Louis, 478 S.W.2d 266 (Mo.1972); Kirtz v. Grossman, 463 S.W.2d 541 (Mo.App.1971). This court in Fix v. … Brown v. Citizens’ State Bank, 345 Mo. 480 , 134 S.W.2d 116 (1939); Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe Corp., 307 Mo. 74 , 269 S.W. 593 (banc 1925).