Case law

Renfro v. Central Coal & Coke Co.

223 Mo. App. 1219 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1929

It did not (as in the case of Barz v. … In the case of Barz v.

Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

22 Mo. App. 60 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1886

Lucas v. Railroad, 33 Wis. 41 ; Railroad v. Montgomery, 7 Ind. 474 ; Dunn v. Railroad, 58 Me. 187 . … Freto v. Brown, 4 Mass. 675 ; Commonwealth v. Hamil ton., 6 Mass. 273 ; Guy v. Ballon, 4 Wend. 403 ; The State v. Scott, 30 N. H. 274; Williams v. Hutchinson,. 3 N. Y. 312 ; Worcester v. Marchant, 19 Pick. 510 .

State v. Mick

506 S.W.2d 35 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1974

Included in those materials were two flashlights, pliers, a large screw driver, two pairs of brown cotton gloves, a tire tool, and two or three shirts. … In State v.

George v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.

213 Mo. App. 668 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1923

[Rashall v. Railroad, 249 Mo. 509 ; Brown v. Brown, 237 Mo. 662 , 668; Burge v. Railroad, 244 Mo. 76 , 94.] … [Hamilton v. Railroad, 250 Mo. 714 ; Whitesides v. Railroad, 186 Mo. App. 608 ; Justus v. Railway, 224 S.W. 79 ; Baecker v. Railroad, 144 S.W. 803 .] The judgment is reversed. All concur.

Hazelcrest III Condominium Association v. Frank Bent

495 S.W.3d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2016

Murphy v. … See Byrd v. Brown, 641 S.W.2d 163, 173 (Mo. App.

State v. Hemphill

721 S.W.2d 86 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1986

State v. Armbruster, 641 S.W.2d 763, 766 (Mo.1982). See also, State v. McDonald, 661, S.W.2d 497, 506 (Mo. banc 1983). … State v. Moore, 620 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Mo. banc 1981). See, State v. Ferguson, 651 S.W.2d 521, 523 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Karnes, 608 S.W.2d 455, 457 (Mo.App.1980); and State v. Ganaway, 556 S.W.2d 67, 69 (Mo.App.1977).

Webster v. State

837 S.W.2d 585 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1992

Brown’s testimony are true, they may have aided [movant’s] defense and would not have been merely cumulative. See State v. Hayes, 785 S.W.2d 661, 663 (Mo. App., W.D.1990). … In Strickland v.

State of Missouri Ex Rel. Chris Koster v. The Honorable Cynthia Suter, Associate Circuit Judge of Randolph County and Peggy Boots, Circuit Clerk Randolph County Circuit Court

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2014

Valentine v. Orr, 366 S.W.3d 534, 538 (Mo. banc 2012); State ex rel. Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006). … State v.

Miller v. Miller

184 S.W.3d 174 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2006

Kessinger v. Kessinger, 829 S.W.2d 658, 660 (Mo.App.1992); State ex rel. Williams v. … Williams, 647 S.W.2d 590, 593 [5] (Mo.App.1983). 5 The trial court here clearly had authority to include Brown’s fees as part of Father’s child support obligation. See Foraker v.

State v. Williams

740 S.W.2d 244 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1987

We believe this issue was resolved against defendant in our recent case of State v. White, 738 S.W.2d 590 (Mo.App.E.D.1987). … State v. Olson, 636 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. banc 1982) [1-4].

Cowgill v. Linville

20 Mo. App. 138 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1886

Stat.; Chandler v. Stephens, 68 Mo. 452 ; Stagg v. Linnenfelser, 59 Mo. 342 . … The title to the notes vested in Brown when he became administrator de bonis non (State v. Fulton, 35 Mo 323, and State v.

Farm Properties Holdings, L.L.C. v. Lower Grassy Creek Cemetery, Inc.

208 S.W.3d 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

The standard of review in a court-tried case is governed by Murphy v. … Dorman v. Dorman, 91 S.W.3d 167, 169 (Mo.App.2002).

City of Harrisonville v. Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources and Board of Trustees for the Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2023

See Laut v. … Li Lin v.

Rogers v. Rogers

430 S.W.2d 305 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1968

The organization is governed by an eight-man board of dir *307 ectors. Prospective members, if approved by the board, may join the order, or they may enter on a provisional basis for 13 months. … Edgar v. Fitzpatrick, Mo., 377 S.W.2d 314, 318 [12]; Brown v. Montgomery, 354 Mo. 1041, 1050-1051 , 193 S.W. 2d 23, 27 [3]; Niedt v. American Ry. Express Co., Mo.App., 6 S.W.2d 973 [1].

State v. Scroggs

521 S.W.3d 649 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2017

In early June of 2013, Brown took the three children to visit Pleasant Hill. Brown noticed that Scroggs appeared to be pregnant. … Brown received a call from Matthew on November 4, 2013, requesting that Brown come to his home. When Brown arrived, Matthew looked like he had not slept and was exhausted, as if he were “crashing.”

Wilson v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

129 Mo. App. 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1908

In Grimes v. … [Railroad v. Paney (Texas), 99 S. W. 589 ; Brown v. Railroad, 20 Mo. App. 222 .]

Esmar v. Haeussler

234 Mo. App. 217 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1938

[Markhan v. Jaudon, 41 N. Y. 235 ; Brown v. Warren, 43 New Hamp. 430; Providence Thread Co. v. Aldrich, 12 R. I. 77; Story on Bailments, section 297.]” *229 “The law seeks substance not forms. … [Citing Horton v. Morgan, 19 N. Y. 170 ; Rogers v. Thomson, 215 App. Div. 541 ; Zimmerman v. Weber, 135 App. Div. 428 ; Harding v. Field, 1 App. Div. 391 ; Banta v.

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Missouri v. Anderson

360 S.W.2d 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1962

Co. of New York v. … Corporation v.

Luebbering Oil Co. v. Ozark Truck Plaza Inc.

883 S.W.2d 558 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1994

Corn v. Holloway, 814 S.W.2d 319, 320 (Mo.App.1991); see also Byrd v. Brown, 641 S.W.2d 163, 165 (Mo.App.1982); Byrd v. Brown, 613 S.W.2d 695, 698-99 (Mo.App.1981), and cases cited therein under n. 3. … Warner, 707 S.W.2d 448, 449 (Mo.App.1986); Byrd v. Brown, 641 S.W.2d at 167 . This court has no choice but to dismiss the appeals. Gurwit v. Kannatzer, supra; Gothard v. Spradling, 561 S.W.2d 448, 449 (Mo.App.1978).

State v. Regot

172 S.W.3d 485 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2005

State v. Westfall, 75 S.W.3d 278, 280 (Mo. banc 2002). A trial court does not err by refusing to submit an instruction that has no basis in the evidence. State v. Wilson, 105 S.W.3d 576, 586 (Mo.App. S.D.2003); State v. … Brown and/or Ms. Seymore were unable to receive information. The case of State v. Hirt, 16 S.W.3d 628 (Mo.App. W.D.2000) is instructive on this point.