Case law

Curl v. BNSF Railway Co.

526 S.W.3d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2017

Id.; Brown v. W. Ry. of Ala., 338 U.S. 294, 296 , 70 S.Ct. 105 , 94 L.Ed. 100 (1949); Yauch, 10 P.3d at 1186-87 ; Eubanks v. CSX Transp., Inc., 223 Ga.App. 616 , 478 S.E.2d 387, 390 (1996); Lopez v. … Thus, in Brown v.

S.M.H. v. Eric Schmitt, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, and Sarah Steelman, Commissioner of Administration, State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2020

Of Mo. v. … We further noted that the City Board and the State failed to take effective measures to desegregate the school system in the years immediately following Brown v.

Rail Switching Services, Inc. v. Marquis-Missouri Terminal, LLC

533 S.W.3d 245 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2017

A Board of Commissioners (“the Board”) governs and administers the Port Authority. 3 Although Madison apprised the Board of his negotiations with RSSI and the existence of a new purported agreement, the Board never voted … Zobel v. Burrell, 167 S.W.3d 688, 692 (Mo. banc 2005) (quoting State v. Brown, 140 S.W.3d 51, 54 (Mo. banc 2004)).

Akers v. Director of Revenue

193 S.W.3d 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2006

Brown v. Dir. of Revenue, 34 S.W.Sd 166, 169 (Mo.App. W.D.2000) (citing Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976)). … Akers relies on Brown v. Director of Revenue, 34 S.W.3d 166 (Mo.App.

Lewis v. Lohman

936 S.W.2d 582 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1996

Chinnery v. Director of Revenue, 885 S.W.2d 50, 51 (Mo.App.1994). … Thomas v. Director of Revenue, 875 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Mo. App.1994). Courts generally accept the breathalyzer machine as a reliable device for the measurement of blood alcohol content. State v.

Clary v. United Telephone Co.

670 S.W.2d 936 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1984

It was impossible to raise those lines by a two-by-four for the hay to clear them because the board was not long enough and the lines were too heavy to be so supported. … Brown, 340 S.W.2d 656 (Mo. banc 1960); White v. Burkeybile, 386 S.W.2d 418 (Mo.1965); Kettler v. Hampton, 365 S.W.2d 518 (Mo.1963).

Missouri Electric Cooperatives v. Kander

497 S.W.3d 905 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2016

The rationale for limiting pre-election review of the constitutionality of an initiative petition is explained in Brown v. … Co. v. Kirkpatrick, 678 S.W.2d 402, 405 (Mo.banc 1984) (citing State ex rel. Dahl v. Lange, 661 S.W.2d 7, 8 (Mo.banc 1983); Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo.banc 1942); Pitman v.

Link v. Cox

529 S.W.2d 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1975

See Conroy’s Inc. v. Ratz, 14 S.W.2d 465 (Mo.App.1929); Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Tatro, 416 S.W.2d 696 (Mo.App.1967). No serious argument is raised that C & L Enterprises was insolvent at the time of both loans. … Ethridge v. Perryman, 363 S.W.2d 696 (Mo.1963) and Murphy v. Olds, 508 S.W.2d 249 (Mo.App.1974). There simply is no circumstantial evidence here except the marriage upon which to base a finding of agency.

Smith v. Citizens Bank of Gerald

232 Mo. App. 906 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1937

[Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. Sun Realty Company, 324 Mo. 510 , 24 S. W. (2d) 108 ; State ex rel. Equality Savings & Building Ass’n v. Brown, 334 Mo. 781 , 68 S. W. (2d) 55 .] … In Phoenix Trust Co. v. Holt, 312 Mo. 563 , 279 S.

Metmor Financial, Inc. v. Leggett

787 S.W.2d 733 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1989

Kerr v. Kerr, 519 S.W.2d 303 (Mo.App., K.C.Dist.1975). A judgment entered without personal jurisdiction over a party is void. Gerding v. … Burchett, 572 S.W.2d at 502 (citing Murphy v.

Wernick v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

131 Mo. App. 37 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1908

A notable instance of this kind is Boorman v. Brown, 3 Adolph. & Ellis, 511, 11 C. & Finn. (H. of L.) 1. A form of declaration in case for goods sold and delivered is given in Stephen on Pleadings (page 120). … Law, 626; Burnett v. Lynch, 5 B. & C. 589; Boorman v. Brown, supra.]

Estate of Looney v. Browning

112 Mo. App. 195 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1905

Grover v. … Donaldson v. Lewis, 7 Mo. App. 403 ; Owens v. Link, 48 Mo. App. 534 .

Cooper v. Winnwood Amusement Co.

227 Mo. App. 608 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1932

[Stauffer v. Ry. Co., 243 Mo. 305 , 147 S. W. 1032 ; Neal v. Caldwell (Mo.), 32 S. W. (2d) 104 ; Clark v. A. & E. Bridge Co., 24 S. W. (2d) 143 ; Goucan v. Atlas P. Cement Co., 317 Mo. 919 , 298 S. W. 789 ; Morris v. … Defendant also cites the case of Pointer v. Mt. Ry. Const. Co., 269 Mo. 104 , 189 S. W. 805 . This court said in Brown v. Amusement Co., 34 S.

Deatherage v. Sheidley

50 Mo. App. 490 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1892

See, also, Broadwell v. Clark, 39 Mo. 170 , and Ombony v. Jones, 19 N. Y. 234 . … Brown et al.

Huber v. Magna Bank of Missouri

959 S.W.2d 812 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1997

Martin v. City of Washington, 848 S.W.2d 487, 491 (Mo. banc 1993). … Boatright v. Shaw, 804 S.W.2d 795, 796 (Mo.App. E.D.1990).

Harding v. Modern Income Life Insurance Co.

593 S.W.2d 568 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1979

Plaintiffs were also advised that they had become members of an “Advisory Board” and received a document entitled “Advisory Board Duties, Future Security Life.” … This concept of requiring reasonable self-protection was further defined in Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg.

State of Missouri v. Daniel J. Garber

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2025

State v. Brown, 619 S.W.3d 586, 590 (Mo. App. E.D. 2021) (quoting State v. Bescher, 247 S.W.3d 135, 140 (Mo. App. S.D. 2008)); see also Harrison v. State, 301 S.W.3d 534, 539 (Mo. App. S.D. 2009); State v. … See Brown, 619 S.W.3d at 592.

Uelk v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc.

803 S.W.2d 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1991

Brown v. Harrison, 637 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App., W.D.1982). … Brown, 637 S.W.2d at 147 (quoting Page v. Hamilton, 329 S.W.2d 758, 767 (Mo.1959)).

State v. Bisans

104 S.W.3d 805 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 2003

State v. Hawthorne, 74 S.W.3d 826, 828 (Mo.App. W.D.2002). Appellant was convicted of making a false report under § 575.080.1. … State v. Givens, 917 S.W.2d 215, 216-17 (Mo.App. W.D.1996).

Stitt v. Stitt

617 S.W.2d 645 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1981

While our courts appear divided on this issue, this court concludes that in the instant proceedings, the rationale expressed in Brown v. Brown, supra, is the appropriate one to follow. In Brown v. … That is not the main point, but it illustrates the soundness of the rationale expressed in Brown v. Brown, supra, and the one adopted herein.