Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.95s

  • Audrey Baker v. Curators of the University of Missouri

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2022

    The headings for Counts I and II against Browning and the Health Department read, “Violation of Missouri Sunshine Law, Plaintiff v. … Kelly v. Boone Cty., 646 S.W.3d 739, 742 (Mo. App. 2022).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. White

    28 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2000

    State v. … State v. Storey, 901 S.W.2d 886, 895 (Mo. banc 1995).

    Vacated on other grounds by State v. White, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 548 (2002)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Rebecca Lynn Larson v. Alvin Winkler; Kevin Goucher and Alisa Goucher

    Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 2024

    See Kerens v. St. … W.D. 1981); Epley v. Epley, 585 S.W.2d 308, 309 (Mo. App. W.D. 1979); First Nat'l Bank of Kansas City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cavallaro v. Denney

    350 S.W.3d 839 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2011

    Vincent Cavallaro appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, denying his claim that he was entitled to parole or conditional release from prison.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri ex rel. Michael Lovelace, Relator v. Honorable Chris Kunza Mennemeyer, Judge of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Missouri

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2014

    Upon successful completion of a treatment program, the board of probation and parole shall advise the sentencing court of an offender’s probationary release date thirty days prior to release. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006); Dorsey, 263 S.W.3d at 791.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Robb

    651 S.W.2d 680 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 1983

    Louis v. Butler Co., supra and as restated in Perez, supra . See also City of Green Ridge v. Brown, 523 S.W.2d 609 (Mo.App.1975). Before considering the failure of respondent to meet the requirements, St. Louis v. … (emphasis added) See also City of Green Ridge v. Brown, supra . Perez and City of Green Ridge find direct application to and are controlling upon the question of respondent's alleged constitutional argument.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Green Hills Solid Waste Management Authority v. Madison Township Planning & Zoning Commission

    892 S.W.2d 621 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1994

    The Commission cites American Hog Co. v. County of Clinton, 495 S.W.2d 123 (Mo.App.1973), and Miller v. … Koewing v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whitney v. Central Paper Stock Company

    446 S.W.2d 415 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1969

    In Reed v. … The test is that stated in Brown v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    963 S.W.2d 317 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1997

    State v. Bragg, 867 S.W.2d 284, 292 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Koster, 684 S.W.2d 488, 491 (Mo.App.1984); see also State v. Lopez, 836 S.W.2d 28, 34-35 (Mo.App.1992). … We refer, of course, to Batson v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Knight Communications, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis

    805 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991

    Brickner v. … Bank v. Kesterson, 257 Ark. 813 , 520 S.W.2d 253, 258 (1975). Florida: Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank, 542 So.2d 1019, 1020 (Fla.App.1989); Southern Contract Carpet, Inc. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Haas v. Director of Revenue

    975 S.W.2d 483 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1998

    Green v. Director of Revenue, 961 S.W.2d 936, 938 (Mo.App. E.D.1998); Section 302.505.1. These showings must be made by a preponderance of the evidence. Rogers v. Director of Revenue, 947 S.W.2d 475, 477 (Mo.App. … Sellenriek v. Director of Revenue, 826 S.W.2d 338, 340-41 (Mo. banc 1992). Brown then testified, without objection, that Driver’s breathalyzer test indicated his blood alcohol content was .191 percent.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Tull v. Fletcher

    196 Mo. App. 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1917

    [McAdow v. Sturtevant, 41 Mo. App. 220, 227 ; Williams v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 112 Mo. 463, 501 ; Hammond v. Darlington, 109 Mo. App. 333, 343 ; Miller v. Barroll, 14 Md. 173 ; Wagenstein v. Jones, 65 N. … W. 218, 220 ; Bruns v. Braun, 35 Mo. 337 ; Badger Lumber Co. v. Lyons Ice etc. Co., supra.] There was no definite or specified bill of lumber agreed upon in the contract appellant had with Brown.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. American Patriots

    162 Mo. App. 231 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1912

    [Idem; Baltimore v. Stewart, 79 Md. 487 ; Short v. Van Dyke, 50 Minn. 286 ; Riley v. Brooklyn, 46 N. Y. 444 .] … [Knapp v. Brotherhood of American *238 Yeoman, 117 N. W. 298 .] The refusal to pay part of plaintiff’s claim was a question of law and not of fact. And so it is held in Brown v. Supreme Court I. O. O. F., 72 N. Y.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Klaas

    8 S.W.3d 906 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2000

    Bushie, Personal Representative Ad Litem, Petitioner, v. Debra K. Brown, James E. Brown, and Edna M. Brown, Respondents. No. 22906. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. … Brown, James E. Brown, and Edna M.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Falkner

    672 S.W.2d 373 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1984

    State v. Brown, 542 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1976). … They clothe the innocent and guilty alike, straight across the board. Were it otherwise, the sustaining integrity of our criminal justice system would be seriously jeopardized.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jinks v. Jinks

    120 S.W.3d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2003

    When the company closed its Kansas City office, Wife began working part time for the Jackson County Election Board. In 1987, Wife started her own business, a tanning and nail salon. … In his argument, Husband cites the case, Brown v. Brown, 14 S.W.3d 704 (Mo.App. S.D.2000), wherein Husband challenged the trial court’s division of property.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dubois v. Dubois

    875 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1994

    Brokaw v. Board of Education, 171 S.W.2d 75 , 85[18] (Mo.App.1943). This we will not do. Appellate courts do not render advisory opinions or decide nonexistent issues. Warren v. … Compare Brown v. General Motors Assembly Div., 695 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Mo.App.1985).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. Eastern Chemical Waste Systems

    234 S.W.3d 452 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2007

    Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 98 (Mo.App.2006) (quotation marks and citation omitted). … Brown v. D.C., 853 A.2d 733, 736 (D.C.2004). However, it is not a statute of limitations, which can be tolled due to the failure to discover rule. Id. at 736-37 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hugelman v. Beltone Kansas City Hearing Service Co.

    389 S.W.2d 220 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1965

    Pratt v. Reed & Brown Hauling Co., 361 S.W.2d 57 , Mo.App. … Pratt v. Reed & Brown Hauling Co., supra; Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co., 336 Mo. 1000 , 82 S.W.2d 909 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Boyer Lumber, Inc. v. Blair

    510 S.W.2d 738 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1974

    See also Brown Supply Co. v. J. C. Penney Co., 505 S.W.2d 463 (Mo.App.1974). Under all the circumstances we believe that Busenbark sufficiently asserted his claim by proper pleading. … See also Moon v. Brown, 172 Mo.App. 516 , 158 S.W. 79 (1913). 9 . The differences between Boyer’s invoices and Mr.

    Overruled on other grounds by R. L. Sweet Lumber Co. v. E. L. Lane, Inc., 513 S.W.2d 365 (1974)Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.