Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.95s
Audrey Baker v. Curators of the University of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2022
The headings for Counts I and II against Browning and the Health Department read, “Violation of Missouri Sunshine Law, Plaintiff v. … Kelly v. Boone Cty., 646 S.W.3d 739, 742 (Mo. App. 2022).
Cited 0 timesPublished28 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2000
State v. … State v. Storey, 901 S.W.2d 886, 895 (Mo. banc 1995).
Vacated on other grounds by State v. White, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 548 (2002)Cited 15 timesPublishedRebecca Lynn Larson v. Alvin Winkler; Kevin Goucher and Alisa Goucher
Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 2024
See Kerens v. St. … W.D. 1981); Epley v. Epley, 585 S.W.2d 308, 309 (Mo. App. W.D. 1979); First Nat'l Bank of Kansas City v.
Cited 0 timesPublished350 S.W.3d 839 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2011
Vincent Cavallaro appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, denying his claim that he was entitled to parole or conditional release from prison.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMissouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2014
Upon successful completion of a treatment program, the board of probation and parole shall advise the sentencing court of an offender’s probationary release date thirty days prior to release. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006); Dorsey, 263 S.W.3d at 791.
Cited 0 timesPublished651 S.W.2d 680 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 1983
Louis v. Butler Co., supra and as restated in Perez, supra . See also City of Green Ridge v. Brown, 523 S.W.2d 609 (Mo.App.1975). Before considering the failure of respondent to meet the requirements, St. Louis v. … (emphasis added) See also City of Green Ridge v. Brown, supra . Perez and City of Green Ridge find direct application to and are controlling upon the question of respondent's alleged constitutional argument.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGreen Hills Solid Waste Management Authority v. Madison Township Planning & Zoning Commission
892 S.W.2d 621 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1994
The Commission cites American Hog Co. v. County of Clinton, 495 S.W.2d 123 (Mo.App.1973), and Miller v. … Koewing v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhitney v. Central Paper Stock Company
446 S.W.2d 415 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1969
In Reed v. … The test is that stated in Brown v.
Cited 12 timesPublished963 S.W.2d 317 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1997
State v. Bragg, 867 S.W.2d 284, 292 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Koster, 684 S.W.2d 488, 491 (Mo.App.1984); see also State v. Lopez, 836 S.W.2d 28, 34-35 (Mo.App.1992). … We refer, of course, to Batson v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedKnight Communications, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis
805 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991
Brickner v. … Bank v. Kesterson, 257 Ark. 813 , 520 S.W.2d 253, 258 (1975). Florida: Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank, 542 So.2d 1019, 1020 (Fla.App.1989); Southern Contract Carpet, Inc. v.
Cited 19 timesPublished975 S.W.2d 483 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1998
Green v. Director of Revenue, 961 S.W.2d 936, 938 (Mo.App. E.D.1998); Section 302.505.1. These showings must be made by a preponderance of the evidence. Rogers v. Director of Revenue, 947 S.W.2d 475, 477 (Mo.App. … Sellenriek v. Director of Revenue, 826 S.W.2d 338, 340-41 (Mo. banc 1992). Brown then testified, without objection, that Driver’s breathalyzer test indicated his blood alcohol content was .191 percent.
Cited 12 timesPublished196 Mo. App. 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1917
[McAdow v. Sturtevant, 41 Mo. App. 220, 227 ; Williams v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 112 Mo. 463, 501 ; Hammond v. Darlington, 109 Mo. App. 333, 343 ; Miller v. Barroll, 14 Md. 173 ; Wagenstein v. Jones, 65 N. … W. 218, 220 ; Bruns v. Braun, 35 Mo. 337 ; Badger Lumber Co. v. Lyons Ice etc. Co., supra.] There was no definite or specified bill of lumber agreed upon in the contract appellant had with Brown.
Cited 5 timesPublished162 Mo. App. 231 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1912
[Idem; Baltimore v. Stewart, 79 Md. 487 ; Short v. Van Dyke, 50 Minn. 286 ; Riley v. Brooklyn, 46 N. Y. 444 .] … [Knapp v. Brotherhood of American *238 Yeoman, 117 N. W. 298 .] The refusal to pay part of plaintiff’s claim was a question of law and not of fact. And so it is held in Brown v. Supreme Court I. O. O. F., 72 N. Y.
Cited 2 timesPublished8 S.W.3d 906 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2000
Bushie, Personal Representative Ad Litem, Petitioner, v. Debra K. Brown, James E. Brown, and Edna M. Brown, Respondents. No. 22906. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. … Brown, James E. Brown, and Edna M.
Cited 25 timesPublished672 S.W.2d 373 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1984
State v. Brown, 542 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1976). … They clothe the innocent and guilty alike, straight across the board. Were it otherwise, the sustaining integrity of our criminal justice system would be seriously jeopardized.
Cited 12 timesPublished120 S.W.3d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2003
When the company closed its Kansas City office, Wife began working part time for the Jackson County Election Board. In 1987, Wife started her own business, a tanning and nail salon. … In his argument, Husband cites the case, Brown v. Brown, 14 S.W.3d 704 (Mo.App. S.D.2000), wherein Husband challenged the trial court’s division of property.
Cited 14 timesPublished875 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1994
Brokaw v. Board of Education, 171 S.W.2d 75 , 85[18] (Mo.App.1943). This we will not do. Appellate courts do not render advisory opinions or decide nonexistent issues. Warren v. … Compare Brown v. General Motors Assembly Div., 695 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Mo.App.1985).
Cited 2 timesPublishedTownsend v. Eastern Chemical Waste Systems
234 S.W.3d 452 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2007
Thompson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 207 S.W.3d 76, 98 (Mo.App.2006) (quotation marks and citation omitted). … Brown v. D.C., 853 A.2d 733, 736 (D.C.2004). However, it is not a statute of limitations, which can be tolled due to the failure to discover rule. Id. at 736-37 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedHugelman v. Beltone Kansas City Hearing Service Co.
389 S.W.2d 220 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1965
Pratt v. Reed & Brown Hauling Co., 361 S.W.2d 57 , Mo.App. … Pratt v. Reed & Brown Hauling Co., supra; Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co., 336 Mo. 1000 , 82 S.W.2d 909 .
Cited 8 timesPublished510 S.W.2d 738 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1974
See also Brown Supply Co. v. J. C. Penney Co., 505 S.W.2d 463 (Mo.App.1974). Under all the circumstances we believe that Busenbark sufficiently asserted his claim by proper pleading. … See also Moon v. Brown, 172 Mo.App. 516 , 158 S.W. 79 (1913). 9 . The differences between Boyer’s invoices and Mr.
Overruled on other grounds by R. L. Sweet Lumber Co. v. E. L. Lane, Inc., 513 S.W.2d 365 (1974)Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna