Case law

Calhoun v. Calhoun

156 S.W.3d 410 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2005

Brown v. Brown, 14 S.W.3d 704, 707 (Mo. App.2000). The burden of showing adverse tax consequences must be established with particularity at trial. Linton, 117 S.W.3d at 206 [24]. … At the time of trial, the "children” were both in college and Husband paid all expenses related thereto, including tuition and room and board.

Broderick v. Tyer

239 Mo. App. 118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1945

[Brown v. Weare et al., 152 S. W. (2d) 649 ; Boyce v. Mo. Pac. R. R. Co., 168 Mo. 583 ; Kellog v. Malin, 50 Mo. 496 .] … [Brown v. Weare, supra.]

Elliot v. Thomas

161 Mo. App. 441 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1912

There was some testimony that her bachelor brother sometimes boards with her but he has a separate home of his own and she testified that there was no one dependent upon her. … Also, Spengler v. Kaufman & Wilkinson, 43 Mo. App. 513 ; Brown v. Brown’s Administrator, 68 Mo. 388, 391 ; Biffle v. Pullam, 114 Mo. 50, 53 , 21 S. W. 450 ; McCanna *447 v. Anderson (N. D.), 71 N. W. 769 ; Calhoun v.

Davison v. Davison

100 Mo. App. 263 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1903

Louis, boarding at different places, sometimes under the name of Lloyd and sometimes under that of Davison. … Rowden v. Brown, 91 Mo. 429 .

Lemasters v. Willman

281 S.W.2d 580 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1955

The supreme court approved injunction to prevent a board of education and its superintendent of instruction from employing and dismissing teachers without legal authority in State ex rel. Brown v. … Board of Education of City of Duluth, 215 Minn. 590 , 11 N.W.2d 76 (supt. not a teacher); Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v.

Carter v. Norfolk & Western Railway

708 S.W.2d 306 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1986

They then crawled under the train and walked south on Brown Road. After the coupling was completed, Peery boarded the railroad’s van and proceeded eastwardly on Interstate Highway 70, as noted above. Gerald L. … Brown v. Alton R. Co., 236 Mo.App. 26 , 151 S.W.2d 727, 738 (1941). Furthermore, in oral argument, defendants’ counsel conceded that the statement could be understood as having been made simply “by way of argument.”

Ceradsky v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc.

583 S.W.2d 193 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1979

Pratt v. Reed & Brown Hauling Company, supra, 1. c. 63[6]. … Hickey v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, supra, 256 S.W.2d 1 . c. 777[2-5].

Carson v. City of Springfield

53 Mo. App. 289 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1893

Pinney v. Berry, 61 Mo. 360 ; Brown v. Railroad, 80 Mo. 457 ; Smith v. Railroad, 98 Mo. 20; Paddock v. Somes, 102 Mo. 239 ; Van Hoozier v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 145 ; Dickson v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 575; Benson v. … The same rule was announced in Brown v. Railroad, supra, where the plaintiff sued for damages for the overflow of his farm, caused by the construction of a dam by the defendant across Beaver Dam fork of Salt river.

Blake H. Donaldson, D.O. v. Missouri State Board of Registration for The Healing Arts

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2020

(citation omitted); see Stone v. Mo. … Co. v.

Ellett-Kendall Shoe Co. v. Western Stores Co.

132 Mo. App. 513 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1908

Its board of directors is composed of three members and it appears that the execution of the contract under consideration was not authorized or ratified by the board in any manner. … [Grohmann v. Brown, 68 Mo. App. 630 ; City of Goodland v. Bank, 74 Mo. App. 365 ; Winscott v. Investment Co., 63 Mo. App. 367 .] The case in hand belongs to a different class and is controlled by a different rule.

Deibel v. Jefferson Bank

200 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1919

Deibel, plain *557 tiff herein, was formally adopted by the board, and formally carried ont by resolution of the board on May 5, 1909. … [See Bushnell v. Loomis, supra; Brown v. Worthingham, 162 Mo. App. 508 , l. c. 518; Ferrari v. Board of Health (Fla.), 5 South. 1 ; Sornberger v. Sanford (Neb.), 52 N. W. 368 .]

Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

114 Mo. App. 670 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1905

In Tucker v. … [Brown v. Railroad, 67 Mo. 122 .]

Selberg v. Selberg

201 S.W.3d 513 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2006

Granada Board of Managers v. Coffer, 78 S.W.3d 874 , 876 (Mo.App.2002). Moreover, Selberg’s brief flagrantly and repeatedly violates Rule 84.04’s requirements concerning the contents of briefs. … Brown v. Shannahan, 141 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Mo.App.2004).

White v. Otten

810 S.W.2d 704 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1991

Porter v. Mallet, 596 S.W.2d 451, 452-53 (Mo.App.1980); Pietrowski v. Mykins, 498 S.W.2d 572, 579 (Mo.App.1973); Stroud v. Govreau, 495 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Mo.App.1973). … Strickner v. Brown, 491 S.W.2d 253, 255 (Mo.1973); Dennis v. St. Louis Board of Education, 809 S.W.2d 20, 21 (Mo.App.1991). The essential question is whether the trial court abused its discretion.

State Ex Rel. Hand v. Bilyeu

346 S.W.2d 221 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1961

In one of those meetings she and the Fairview board turned over to the Maries board all of the records of the Fair-view district. … American Legion Phillips Post v. City of Malden, Mo.App., 330 S.W.2d 189 , and cases at loc. cit. 191; State ex rel. Brown v. Cape, Mo.App., 266 S.W.2d 45 . 25 .

Frye v. Meramec Marina, Inc.

673 S.W.2d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1984

After everyone boarded, he started the engine. The craft went about fifteen feet and then the engine died. … Brown v. Thomas, 316 S.W.2d 234, 237 (Mo.App.1958). See Wehrman v. Liberty Petroleum Co. Inc., 382 S.W.2d 56, 65 (Mo.App.1964).

Bollinger v. Major Sheet Metal Co.

668 S.W.2d 106 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1984

The statute nullified these decisions as the Supreme Court noted in Women’s Christian Association of Kansas City v. Brown, 354 Mo. 700, 707 , 190 S.W.2d 900, 904 (1945). … The boards themselves could not constitute a “scaffold,” for they could not float in the air.

State v. Kellogg

561 S.W.3d 905 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2018

Mertens v. Brown , 198 S.W.3d 616 (Mo. banc 2006), the Missouri Supreme Court emphasized that, "[o]nce judgment and sentencing occur in a criminal proceeding, the trial court has exhausted its jurisdiction. … Valentine v. Orr , 366 S.W.3d 534 , 541 (Mo. banc 2012) ; State ex rel. Lovelace v. Mennemeyer , 421 S.W.3d 555 , 557 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014) ; State ex rel. Kizer v. Mennemeyer , 421 S.W.3d 558 , 560 (Mo. App.

City of Joplin v. Village of Shoal Creek Drive

434 S.W.2d 25 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 1968

Communications Workers of America, etc. v. Brown, Mo., 247 S.W.2d 815, 817 ; 1964 Wash.U.L.Q. § 1.010, pp. 442-445. … School Dist. of City of Birmingham v. School Dist. No. 2, etc., 318 Mich. 363 , 28 N.W.2d 265, 268 [2]; City of Fort Worth v. State ex rel. Ridglea Village, supra, 186 S.W.2d at 328 [6, 7] ; Village of Brown Deer v.

Jarrett v. Hill

648 S.W.2d 170 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1983

Hermel, Inc., 564 S.W.2d at 894 ; Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 782 (Mo. banc 1976). … Following the precedent established by this court in Brown v.