Case law

Thompson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.

111 Mo. App. 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1905

J., in Scott v. … In Brown v. Railway, 99 Mu. l. c. 381, 12 S. W. 655 , it is said: “General damages are such as the law. imlies or presumes to have occurred from the wrong complained of, and that they need not he pleaded.

Spaulding v. City of Edina

104 Mo. App. 45 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1904

Brown who treated plaintiff in January, 1901. The sidewalk was constructed by laying three parallel stringers lengthwise on the street and nailing .boards crosswise thereon. … In Chouquette v.

Muse v. Woyner

698 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1985

Plaintiffs James Paul Muse and Marie Muse sued their daughter, defendant Ruth Brown Woyner, and her husband, defendant Charles Woyner. … Bell v. Green, 423 S.W.2d 724, 732 [12] (Mo. banc 1968); Nelson v. Grice, 411 S.W.2d 117, 126 (Mo.1967); Obermeyer v. Hentschel, 389 S.W.2d 203, 206 [3] (Mo.1965); Stouse v. Stouse, 270 S.W.2d 822, 826 [1] (Mo.1954).

Williams v. Jones

562 S.W.2d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1978

Brown’s request for suspension. F. … Board of Regents of State College v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Royal Casualty Co. v. Puller

194 Mo. App. 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1916

[See Furniture, etc., Co. v. Crawford, 127 Mo. l. c. 364, 30 S. W. 163 ; Brown Const. Co. v. Construction Co., 150 Mo. App. l. c. 513, 514, 131 S. W. 134 ; Van Noy v. Ins. Co., 168 Mo. App. 287 , 153 S. W. 1090 .] … [Van Noy v. Ins. Co., supra, l. c. 295, 296.]

Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City v. Ivanhoe Neighborhood Council

316 S.W.3d 418 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 2010

Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. … Comm’n v. Rantz, 43 S.W.3d 436, 440 (Mo.App.

Ford Leasing Development Co. v. City of Ellisville

718 S.W.2d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1986

Brown v. Gambrel, 358 Mo. 192 , 213 S.W.2d 931, 935 (1948). In the present case Bud Anderson was granted a conditional use permit for an AMC Jeep Dealership. … Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Frontenac, 672 S.W.2d 147, 151 (Mo.App.1984).

Heether v. City of Huntsville

121 Mo. App. 495 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1906

[Beauvais v. St. Louis, 169 Mo. 503 ; Chilton v. St. Joseph, 143 Mo. 192 ; Loewer v. Sedalia, 77 Mo. 431 ; Snow v. Provincetown, 120 Mass. 580 ; Barton v. Springfield, 110 Mass. 131 .] … [Wilson v. Board of Education, 63 Mo. 140 ; Buesching v. Gaslight Co., 73 Mo. 231 ; Brown v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 310 .] Complaint is made of the refusal of defendant’s instructions 14 and 15.

In Re Marriage of D. M. S.

648 S.W.2d 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1983

Brown v. Brown, 537 S.W.2d 434, 437-38 (Mo.App.1976). Here, as to the modification of the amount of child support for A_, we find no evidence of such abuse. … Lodahl v. Papenberg, 277 S.W.2d 548, 550-51 (Mo.1955). See Federbush v. Mark Twain Parkway Bank, 575 S.W.2d 829 (Mo.App.1978). See also Gardine v.

Moore v. State Tax Commission

862 S.W.2d 407 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1993

Brown Group, Inc. v. Admin. Hearing Com’n, 649 S.W.2d 874, 881 (Mo. banc 1983). … Because the hearings provided by the Commission on appeals taken from decisions of the Board of Equalization (the “Board”) are de novo, Koplar v.

Brougham v. City of Normandy

812 S.W.2d 919 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1991

In Garrity v. … Brown v. City of North Kansas City, 779 S.W.2d 596, 597-98 (Mo.App.1989).

Rousey v. Wood

63 Mo. App. 460 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1895

State ex rel. v. Weatherly, 45 Mo. 17 ; Snoddy v. Pettis Co., 45 Mo. 361 ; State ex rel. v. Young, 84 Mo. 90 ; Riggin v. O’Brien, 34 Mo. App. 613 ; State v. Searcy, 39 Mo. App. 393 ; State v. Searcy, 46 Mo. … App. 219 ; State v. Mackin, 51 Mo. App. 307 ; White v. Brown, 48 Mo. App. 113 .

Farmer's Bank of Antonia v. Kostman

577 S.W.2d 915 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1979

Peck Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189 , 105 S.W.2d 909, 911 [3] (banc 1937); Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 51.02 (4th ed. 1973). … State Banking Board, supra, l.c. 24, 26; Central Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board, supra, l.c. 181[1].

Gamble v. Browning

379 S.W.3d 194 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2012

Gamble v. Browning, 277 S.W.3d 723, 728 (Mo.App. W.D.2008). … Gamble originally named members of the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners as additional defendants. He dismissed his claims against them while the case was on appeal for the first time. .

City of St. Louis ex rel. Duff v. Karr

85 Mo. App. 608 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1900

In the case of the City of Topeka v. … Merchant v. Bothwell, 60 Mo. App. 341 ; Woolridge v. Rentschler, 62 Mo. App. 591 ; Mayor v. Opel, 49 Mo. 190 ; Brown v. Harris, 52 Mo. 306 ; State to use v. O’Neil, 151 Mo. 67 ; St. L. & S. F. R. R. Co. v.

Denson v. State

31 S.W.3d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2000

See State v. … State v. Jennings, 778 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Mo.App.1989). Although the Missouri Supreme Court rejected this rationale in State v.

Paul v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.

87 Mo. App. 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1901

Eyerman v. Cemetery Ass’n, 61 Mo. 489 ; Davis v. Brown, 67 Mo. 313 ; Yeats v. Ballentine, 56 Mo. 530 . … See Libhart v. Wood, 1 Watts & Serg. (Pa.) 265; Sea v. Carpenter, 16 Ohio 412 ; Vennum v. Gregory, 21 Iowa 326 ; Sumner v. Reicheniche, 9 Kan. 320 ; Porters v. Silvers, 35 Ind. 295 ; Fordyce v. Pepper, 16 Fed.

Foremost Insurance Co. v. Public Service Commission

985 S.W.2d 793 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1998

Muth v. Board of Regents of Southwest Missouri State Univ., 887 S.W.2d 744, 751 (Mo. App. S.D.1994). … Rustici v. Weidemeyer, 673 S.W.2d 762, 772 (Mo. banc 1984) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982)); Browning by Browning v. White, 940 S.W.2d 914, 924 (Mo.App.

State ex rel. Watson v. Harper

11 Mo. App. 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1881

v. … There never- *303 was a valid lien in this case, for the same reason that there never was a valid tax bill in Brown v.

Tyler v. Whitehead

583 S.W.2d 240 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1979

Shapiro v. Columbia Union Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 576 S.W.2d 310, 316 (Mo. banc 1978). To the same effect, see Brown v. Chastain, 416 F.2d 1012, 1014 (5th Cir. 1969); Young v. … Board of Ed. of Fremont County School District, RE-3, 416 F.Supp. 1139, 1140-1141 (D.C.Colo.1976); Bennun v. Board of Governors of Rutgers, 413 F.Supp. 1274, 1278-9 (D.C.N.J.1976); New Times, Inc., v.