Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.70s

  • Mathews v. B AND K FOODS, INC.

    332 S.W.3d 273 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2011

    Brown, and by testimony of Claimant herself. … To support her position, Claimant relies on Kennett Board of Public Works v. Shipman, 15 S.W.3d 792 (Mo.App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Members of the Board of Education of Everton R-III School District v. Members of the Board of Education of Greenfield R-IV School District

    572 S.W.2d 899 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1978

    No. 11 v. Snider, 470 S.W.2d 805, 809 (Mo.App.1971). In State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Hough v. … In an earlier chapter of Eckley, England v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pape v. Reither

    918 S.W.2d 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

    See Roberson v. … Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 154 (Mo.1969); Matyska at 700 . It is equally clear that these statements assert facts rather than opinions.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. Barker

    755 S.W.2d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1988

    that the Circuit Court of Christian County was determined to be a permissible venue in which a discharged employee of the City of Springfield could file a petition for review of the decision of the Springfield Personnel Board … City of Springfield v. Crouch, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State, ex rel. Cooperative Ass'n No. 86 of Aurora v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Aurora

    977 S.W.2d 79 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1998

    Gibson v. Gibson-Cato, 941 S.W.2d 868, 870-71 [1] (Mo.App. S.D.1997); Porter v. Emerson Electric Co., 895 S.W.2d 155, 160-61 (Mo.App. S.D.1995); Brown v. … for [Board’s] decision.” 8 Co-op candidly acknowledges the holding in Ogawa v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Langston v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    575 S.W.3d 744 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Molly Kruse v. Jonathan R. Karlen

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2024

    Brown v. Johnson, 925 S.W.2d 456 (Mo. … Bugg, 242 S.W.3d at 734 (internal quotation omitted); see also Brown Tr. of Eugene D. Brown Trusts Created by Tr. Agreement Dated February 27, 1989 v. Brown, 648 S.W.3d 55, 64 (Mo. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dillen v. Remley

    327 S.W.2d 931 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1959

    White v. Sievers, 359 Mo. 145 , 221 S.W.2d 118, 123 ; Douglas v. Thompson, Mo., 286 S.W.2d 833, 834 . … Hull v. Baumann, 345 Mo. 159 , 131 S.W.2d 721, 725 ; State ex rel. and to Use of George B. Peck & Co. v. Brown, 340 Mo. 1189 , 105 S.W.2d 909, 911 ; State ex rel. Jones v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. CX Roberson, Inc.

    122 S.W.3d 624 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2003

    CX Roberson, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Carrie Johnson and Brown Bogan, after a jury trial in which Johnson was awarded $400,000.00 in damages for injury and damages suffered in an August 24, 1999 automobile

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Managers of a Part of Peppertree Square, Section No. 1 v. Ricketts

    701 S.W.2d 767 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1985

    Respondents cite Matz v. … Gieselmann v. Stegeman, 470 S.W.2d 522, 525 [5] (Mo.1971). There was no abuse of discretion here. The trial court’s order assessing costs against the Board is affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. Conley

    760 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1988

    City of Springfield, Missouri, through the Board of Public Utilities v. Boone Electric Cooperative, a Rural Electric Cooperative. … Dunphy v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Industrial Comm. of Mo.

    240 Mo. App. 1022 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1949

    Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation et al., 56 A.2d 587 ; Brown et al. v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board (Md.), 55 A.2d 696 ; Steamship Trade Ass'n. of Baltimore et al. v. Davis et al., 57 A.2d 818 . … The same issue was raised in Brown v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Industrial Commission of Mo

    223 S.W.2d 835 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1949

    Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Commission et al., 136 N.J. L. 372, 56 A.2d 587 ; Brown et al. v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board, Md., 55 A.2d 696 ; Steamship Trade Ass'n of Baltimore et al. v. … The same issue was raised in Brown v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Norman v. Willis

    402 S.W.2d 46 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1966

    See Nelson v. Browning, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 873 , Cure v. City of Jefferson, Mo., 380 S.W.2d 305 , Oakley v. Duerbeck Co., Mo., 366 S.W.2d 430 , and Cooper v. Finke, Mo., 376 S.W.2d 225 . … See Sipes v. Vaca, Mo., 397 S.W.2d 658 , Ford Motor Company v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 , Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 , and Ostrofsky v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Citizens Bank of Senath v. Douglass

    178 Mo. App. 664 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1913

    [See Van Meter v. Poole, Nelson v. Brown, supra.] … [See Van Meter v. Poole; Nelson v. Brown, supra.]

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Harris

    228 Mo. App. 469 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1934

    [Tinsley et al. v. Savage, 50 Mo. 141 ; Sheedy v. Second National Bank, 62 Mo. 17 ; Norman v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co., 141 S. W. 618 , 237 Mo. 576 .] … [Peoples Savings Bank v. Hoppe, 111 S. W. 1190 , 132 Mo. App. 449 ; Fenton v. Block, 10 Mo. App. 536 .] The issues between garnishee and plaintiff are tried as are ordinary issues between a plaintiff and defendant.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cutts v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

    548 S.W.3d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 2018

    PER CURIAM: *452 Rodney Cutts appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment and entering judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. … He further contends that he was denied meaningful parole consideration when the Board did not disclose to him, and based its decision on, inaccurate adverse information in his parole file.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. Graham

    48 Mo. App. 638 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1892

    That view was affirmed in Ellington v. Moore, 17 Mo. 424 , and again in Chariton Co. v. … The plaintiff’s own evidence shows that, during the month of November, the defendant boarded with one Mrs. Brown in the city ■of St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stephens v. St. Louis County Board of Education, Special School District of St. Louis

    263 S.W.3d 807 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Capitol Insurance Co. v. Hoodco, Inc.

    125 S.W.3d 859 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2003

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.