Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.98s

  • Placzek v. Division of Employment Security

    49 S.W.3d 717 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2001

    Kennett Board Of Public Works v. Shipman, 15 S.W.3d 792, 795 (Mo.App. S.D.2000). … Mitchell v. Division of Employment Security, 922 S.W.2d 425, 427 (Mo.App. S.D.1996). A standard of reasonableness as applied to the average person is used. Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jefferson City Apothecary, LLC d/b/a Jefferson City Apothecary and Uldis Pironis, R.Ph. v. Missouri Board of Pharmacy

    499 S.W.3d 321 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2016

    See Angelos v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 90 S.W.3d 189, 193 (Mo. App. S.D. 2002) (citing Kraus v. Dir. of Revenue, 935 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo. App. W.D. 1996). See also Schrewe v. … State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts v. Brown, 121 S.W.3d 234, 236 (Mo. banc 2003).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kilmer v. Browning

    806 S.W.2d 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1991

    During the winter months the crawl space was closed with a board. Defendant Browning testified that the crawl space was not part of the premises rented to a tenant and she would not expect them to go under the house. … Although as defendant Browning suggests, a landlord is not an insurer of the premises, Thompson v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Shepherd ex rel. Shepherd v. St. Louis County Board of Education

    542 S.W.2d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 11, 1976

    Rock Road Frontage, Inc. v. … Ott v. United States Board of Parole, 324 F.Supp. 1034, 1037 [4] (W.D.Mo.1971).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Maplewood Baptist Church

    409 S.W.2d 247 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1966

    Claude Brown, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the church, executed the note and deed of trust on behalf of the church and Brown, Kellogg and Mrs. … General Refractories Co. v. Howard, 328 Mo. 1139 , 44 S.W.2d 65, 66 (2); Wolz v. Venard, 253 Mo. 67, 82 , 161 S.W. 760, 764 ; Williamson v. Brown, 195 Mo. 313, 332 , 93 S.W. 791, 796 ; Snider v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. McCloud

    522 S.W.2d 631 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1975

    He then stated that Carson “got a board,” and that all he did “was try to defend” himself. … State v. Goodman, supra; State v. Crossman, 464 S.W.2d 36 (Mo.1971); State v. Bazadier, 362 S.W.2d 603 (Mo.1962); State v. Brown, 245 S.W.2d 866 (Mo.1952). The judgment is affirmed. SMITH, C. J., and NORWIN D.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Carapella

    246 S.W.2d 513 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 1952

    Williams v. Williams, 240 Mo.App. 336 , 205 S.W.2d 949 . … Williams v. Williams, supra.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Tegeler v. Kansas City

    95 Mo. App. 162 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1902

    The measure of damages is the compensation for the loss - actually sustained prior to the suit, by reason of the nuisance. ’ ’ Citing, Carson v. Springfield, 53 Mo. 289 ; Pinney v. Berry, 61 Mo. App. 359 ; *166 Brown v. … Railway, 45 Mo. 221 ; Van Hoosier v. Railway, 70 Mo. 145 ; Dickson v. Railroad, 71 Mo. 575 ; Benson v. Railway, 78 Mo. 504 ; Brown v. Railway, 80 Mo. 457 ; Smith v. Railway, 98 Mo. 20 ; Bielman v. Railway, 50 Mo.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Sander v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Creve Coeur

    60 S.W.3d 14 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2001

    For this appeal, we review Board’s findings and conclusions, instead of those issued by the circuit court. State ex rel. Teefey v. … In ascertaining whether substantial evidence exists to support Board’s decision, we view the evidence, and reasonable inferences from the evidence, in the light most favorable to Board’s decision. Id; Behrens v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of St. John

    230 S.W.3d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2007

    Brown v. Shaw, 129 S.W.3d 372 , 374 n. 2 (Mo. banc 2004). … Delay v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 174 S.W.3d 662, 664 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). 2 . Appellant did not move for expedited review of the appeal.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • V. S. DiCarlo General Contractors, Inc. v. Kansas City Area Transportation Authority

    564 S.W.2d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1978

    Myers v. … In Personal Finance Co. of Missouri v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Members of the Board of Education of Everton R-III School District v. Members of the Board of Education of Greenfield R-IV School District

    572 S.W.2d 899 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1978

    No. 11 v. Snider, 470 S.W.2d 805, 809 (Mo.App.1971). In State ex inf. Dalton ex rel. Hough v. … In an earlier chapter of Eckley, England v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. Elwood Grain Co.

    153 Mo. App. 458 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1911

    Bowen v. Lazalere, 44 Mo. 385 ; Hyatt v. Wolfe, 22 Mo. App. l. c. 201. … [Maine Bank v. Smith, 18 Me. 100 ; Whitwell v. Johnson, 17 Mass. 451 ; Bank v. Brown, 22 Me. 295 .] Such usage and custom may be shown to modify the general law merchant as applicable to such bank. [Bank v. L.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Johns

    507 S.W.2d 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1974

    Appel v. … See also Miller v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, 120 N.J.Law 172 , 198 A. 848 (1938); and Commonwealth v. King, 54 Mass. 115, 119 (1847). Brown, et al. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Springfield ex rel. Board of Public Utilities v. Barker

    755 S.W.2d 731 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1988

    that the Circuit Court of Christian County was determined to be a permissible venue in which a discharged employee of the City of Springfield could file a petition for review of the decision of the Springfield Personnel Board … City of Springfield v. Crouch, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Payton v. City of Riverside

    640 S.W.2d 137 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1982

    At a regular Board meeting August 19,1980, the Board adopted Ordinance 80-22. … Mackey v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pape v. Reither

    918 S.W.2d 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

    See Roberson v. … Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 154 (Mo.1969); Matyska at 700 . It is equally clear that these statements assert facts rather than opinions.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • St. Louis Teachers Union, Local 420 ex rel. Franklin v. Board of Education

    921 S.W.2d 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1996

    Louis Teachers Union, Local 420, AFT, AFL-CIO and Sandra Cothran, class representative on behalf of the employees of the Board of Education of the City of St. … Louis (Board), appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court in a declaratory judgment action against the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eikenberry v. St. Louis Transit Co.

    103 Mo. App. 442 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1904

    Doss v. Railroad, 59 Mo. 27 ; Swigert v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 475 ; Leslie v. Railroad, 88 Mo. 51 ; Clotworthy v. Railroad, 80 Mo. 221 ; Straus v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 185 ; Weber v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 194 ; Filer v. … Cicero & Proviso Street Railway Co. v. Meixner, 31 L. R. A. ( 160 Ill. 320 ) 331; Brown v. Seattle City R. R. Co., 16 Wash. 465 ; Morrison v. Railroad, 130 N. Y. 166 ; Omaha Street Railway Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Lane v. Logan Grain Co.

    105 Mo. App. 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1904

    Crawford v. Spencer, 92 Mo. 498 ; Scott v. Brown, 54 Mo. App. 606 ; Pearce v. Rice, 142 U. S. 28 ; Miles v. An *219 drews, 40 Ill. App. 155 ; Whiteside v. Hunt, 97 Ind. 191 ; First Nat'l Bank v. … Oskaloosa Packing Co., 66 Iowa 41 ; Billingslea v. Smith, 77 Ind. 504 ; Mohr v. Meiser, 47 Minn. 228 ; Rudolph v. Winters, 7 Neb. 125 ; Flagg v. Baldwin, 38 N. J. Eq. 219; West v. Wright, 86 Hun 436 ; Pickering v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.