Case law

Day v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Division of the Board of Probation & Parole

153 S.W.3d 350 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2005

State ex rel. Dierberg v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Charles County

869 S.W.2d 865 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1994

This provision has been interpreted to allow the circuit court to hear and consider additional evidence only when there is an allegation of procedural irregularities or unfairness by the zoning board. State v. … Respondent BZA cites Eubanks v. Board of Adjustment, 768 S.W.2d 624 (Mo.App.1989) as authority.

Citizens for Safe Waste Management v. St. Louis County Air Pollution Control Appeal Board

896 S.W.2d 643 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1995

Louis County Air Pollution Appeal Board (Appeal Board), some individual members of that board, the county’s program manager for air pollution, and Halls Ferry Investments, Inc. (Operator). … Rich v. Rich, 871 S.W.2d 618 (Mo.App.1994); Paris v. Director of Revenue, 858 S.W.2d 829 (Mo. App.1993); State v. Eyberg, 671 S.W.2d 26 (Mo.App.1984).

Union Center Redevelopment Corp. v. St. Louis Preservation Board of Planning & Urban Design

75 S.W.3d 784 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2002

See, Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 832 S.W.2d 330, 331 (Mo.App. E.D. 1992) and Zwick v. Board of Adjustment of City of Ladue, 857 S.W.2d 325, 327 (Mo. App. E.D.1993). … Caldwell v. McGahan, 894 S.W.2d 237, 240 (Mo.App. E.D.1995).

Lichte v. Heidlage

536 S.W.2d 898 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1976

V, Sec. 22; Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Assn. v. Board of Adjustment, 425 S.W.2d 929, 936 (Mo. banc 1968); Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjust. of Kansas City, 434 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Mo.App.1968), and Brown v. … Board of Public Utilities v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 145 La. 308 , 82 So. 280, 285 (1919); Wright v. De Fatta, 129 So.2d 614, 619 (La.App.1961); Boyd v. Donelon, 193 So.2d 291, 297 (La.App.1966), and Frankel v. C.

Keesee v. Meadow Heights R-II School District

865 S.W.2d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1993

Nevels v. Board of Education, 822 S.W.2d 898, 900 [3] (Mo.App.E.D.1991); Cochran v. Board of Education, 815 S.W.2d 55, 59 (Mo.App.E.D.1991). We defer to the board’s determination of credibility of witnesses. … Borgers, 806 S.W.2d 724, 730 [7] (Mo.App.E.D.1991); Eagleburger v. Emerson Electric Co., 794 S.W.2d 210, 221 [5] (Mo.App.S.D.1990); Brown v. New Plaza Pontiac Co., 719 S.W.2d 468, 474 [6] (Mo.App.W.D.1986).

Rousey v. Wood

57 Mo. App. 650 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1894

State v. Searcy, 39 Mo. App. 393 ; State v. Searcy, 46 Mo. App. 421 ; In re Rothwell, 44 Mo. App. 219 ; State v. Mackin, 51 Mo. App. 307 ; White v. Brown, 48 Mo. App. 113 ; State ex rel. v. Matherby, 45 Mo. 16 . … Zimmerman v. Snowdon, 88 Mo. 218 ; Railroad v. Leeright, 113 Mo. 660 ; Cory v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 282 ; Railroad v. Young, 96 Mo. 39 .

Perseverance Common School District No. 90 v. Honey

367 S.W.2d 243 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1963

the County Board; that thereafter the County Board refused and failed to alter, change, or revise said “Seventh Plan” but instead resubmitted such original plan to the State Board; that the State Board was offered no opportunity … See National Refining Co. v. Cox, 227 Mo.App. 778 , 57 S.W.2d 778 ; Albers Commission Co. v. Spencer, 205 Mo. 105, 113 , 103 S.W. 523, 524 , 11 L.R.A.,N.S., 1003; Id., 236 Mo. 608 , 139 S.W. 321 ; Brown v.

Thompson v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

244 S.W.3d 180 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2007

During the course of this appeal, State Board of Registration For The Healing Arts v. William D. … See Dorman v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 62 S.W.3d 446, 448 (Mo.App.2001).

Webb v. Strobach

143 Mo. App. 459 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1910

[National Bank v. Williams, 46 Mo. 17 ; Miner v. Tilley, 54 Mo. App. 627 ; State ex rel. v. Stuckey, 78 Mo. App. 533 .] … See also Brown v. Central Bermudez Co. (Ind.), 69 N. E. 150 . While in the cases cited, the question was raised after the improvement was made, such fact would in no wise change the rule of interpretation of the law.

Harris v. Missouri Department of Conservation

755 S.W.2d 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1988

The dismissal *728 of federal suit was upheld in Brown Harris II v. … Roth v. State Highway Commission, 688 S.W.2d 775, 777 (Mo.App.1984) quoting Hamer v. State Highway Commission, 304 S.W.2d 869, 871 (Mo.1957).

Willman v. Phelps

631 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1982

Buder v. Stocke, 121 S.W.2d at 857 ; National Board of Christian Women’s Board of Missions of Christian Church of the United States v. Fry, 293 Mo. 399 , 239 S.W. 519, 523 (1922); Lamkin v. … Emery v. Brown Shoe Co., 287 S.W.2d 761, 766-67 (Mo.1956); Shaffer v. Hines, 573 S.W.2d 420, 422 (Mo.App.1978).

Jordan v. Willens

937 S.W.2d 291 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1996

Jordan appealed the citations to the Property Maintenance Appeals Board, and attended a hearing conducted by the Board on June 8, 1989. One day after the hearing, anticipating an unfavorable ruling by the Board, Mr. … Fischer v. Browne, 586 S.W.2d 738, 736 (Mo.App.1979). In the present case, the parties agree that a five-year statute of limitations applies to each of Mr. Jordan’s claims.

Erath & Flynn v. R. K. Allen & Son

55 Mo. App. 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1893

Co. v. Railroad, 127 Ind. 250 ; Barker v. Buell, 35 Ind. 297 ; Colter v. Frese, 45 Ind. 96 . … Griswold v. Railroad, 18 Mo. App. 52 ; Brown v. Railroad, 36 Mo. App. 458 ; Tewksbury v. Bronson, 4 N. W. Rep. 749 ; Jones on Liens, secs. 1493, 1494.

Soward v. Mahan

926 S.W.2d 138 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 1996

In an action such as this, we review the findings and conclusions of the board of education, an administrative agency, rather than the circuit court. Johnson v. … Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 141-42 (Mo.App.1984). As such,, review by the circuit court is generally limited to the record as compiled before the administrative tribunal. Shadow Lake of Noel v.

Petet v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services

32 S.W.3d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2000

Brown v. Stangler, 954 S.W.2d 707, 708 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). … Hadel v. Board of Educ. of School District of Springfield, R-12, 990 S.W.2d 107, 111 (Mo.App. S.D.1999).

State ex rel. Board of Regents of Southwest Missouri State University v. Bonacker

765 S.W.2d 341 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1989

The Board’s position is supported by Frohoff v. … Milham v. Rickhoff 633 S.W.2d 733 (Mo. banc 1982), a mandamus action arising from a suit against the Board of Curators of the University of Missouri and other defendants, the Supreme Court of Missouri, citing Todd v.

Harless v. Southwest Missouri Electric Railway Co.

123 Mo. App. 22 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1907

[Connell v. Western Union Tel. Co., 116 Mo. 34 ; Trigg v. Railway, 71 Mo. 117 .] … [Smith v. Railway, 122 Mo. App. 85 , 97 S. W. 1007 ; Glover v. Railway, — Mo. App. —; Hickey v. Welch, 91 Mo. App. 1 ; Spry v. Railway, 73 Mo. App. 203 .]

Page v. Green

686 S.W.2d 528 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1985

Bradshaw v. Brown Shoe Co., 660 S.W.2d 390, 392 (Mo.App.1983). However, where the facts on which the decision should turn are not in dispute the award that should be entered becomes a matter of law. Iker-man v. … Brown v. Mid-Central Fish Co., 641 S.W.2d 785, 787 (Mo.App.1982). See also Phillips v. Air Reduction Sales Co., 337 Mo. 587 , 85 S.W.2d 551 (1935); McCue v. Studebaker Automotive Sales, 389 S.W.2d 408 (Mo.

American Sash & Door Co. v. Stein

231 Mo. App. 221 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1936

[Curtin-Clark Hardware Co. v. Churchill, supra; Winslow Bros. Co. v. McCully Stone Co., supra; Ward v. Nolde, supra; Allen Estate Assn. v. Fred Boeke & Son, supra; Masterson v. … [Curtin-Clark Hardware Co. v. Churchill, supra; Masterson v. Roberts, supra; Allen Estate v. Fred Boeke & Son, supra.] 8.