Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.42s

  • Board of Education ex rel. Philip Carey Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

    155 Mo. App. 109 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1911

    Co. v. Gordon, 173 Mo. 139 , 73 S. W. 155 ; Lawrence v. Shreve, 26 Mo. 492 ; McLean v. Stuve, 15 Mo. App. 317, 320 .] … Pub Co. v. Gordon, 173 Mo. 139 , 73 S. W. 155 ; McLean v. Stuve, 15 Mo. App. 317, 321 .]

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Donworth

    127 Mo. App. 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1907

    Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 , 18 S. W. 781 . … -Gen. v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. 443 .] In Smith v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Curtis v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Professional Landscape Architects

    534 S.W.3d 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 2017

    Curtis cites Bird v. … Under Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 744 S.W.2d 524, 538-39 (Mo. App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ky. Bd. of Med. Licensure v. Strauss

    558 S.W.3d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2018

    Shawnee Telecom Res., Inc. v. Brown, 354 S.W.3d 542 (Ky. 2011). … in fact the case held the opposite); "dicta found in Rapier v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Hedrick

    224 S.W.2d 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1949

    Crimes, Sec. 701; State v. Wade, 147 Mo. 73 , 47 S.W. 1070 ; State v. Harmon, 106 Mo. 635 , loc. cit. 657, 18 S.W. 128 ; State v. Chandler, 132 Mo. 155 , 33 S.W. 798 , 799, 53 Am. St.Rep. 483; and State v. … Browning, Mo.App., 217 S.W.2d 719 , charged more than one offense, and many of the cases now cited by appellant were considered in the Browning case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Weatherby Lake Improvement Company, INC v. City of Weatherby Lake Board of Zoning Adjustment

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2024

    V, section 18). … This Court considered a similar situation to the case before us in Gannett Outdoor Company of Kansas City v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Jackson County, 943 S.W.2d 359 (Mo. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wehrman v. Liberty Petroleum Company

    382 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1964

    Brown was the manager of the corporate defendant’s station, which implied some general powers. Heinold v. Muntz T. V. Inc., Mo., 262 S.W.2d 32, 36 . … Brown v. Sloan’s Moving & Storage Co., Mo., 296 S.W.2d 20 ; Raymond, Missouri Instructions, Vol. 2, p. 207, Sec. 4101.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • David Dwyer v. Kansas City Missouri School District

    451 S.W.3d 704 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2014

    The duties associated with that process are more akin to the duties discussed in Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983). … Brown v. Hamid, 856 S.W.2d 51, 55 (Mo. banc 1993). The circuit court has broad discretion to admit or exclude evidence, and we will not reverse its ruling absent an abuse of discretion. Id. at 56.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services

    978 S.W.2d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1998

    Doe Run Co. v. Brown, 918 S.W.2d 303, 306 (Mo.App.1996)). The meaning of the phrase “de novo judicial review” is at issue in the instant case. … Although no cases exist directly on point, we are aware of Brown v. Stangler, 954 S.W.2d 707 (Mo.App.1997).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Dierberg v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Charles County

    869 S.W.2d 865 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1994

    This provision has been interpreted to allow the circuit court to hear and consider additional evidence only when there is an allegation of procedural irregularities or unfairness by the zoning board. State v. … Respondent BZA cites Eubanks v. Board of Adjustment, 768 S.W.2d 624 (Mo.App.1989) as authority.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Campbell v. Police Commissioners

    14 Mo. App. 297 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1883

    Attorney-General v. Brown, 1 Wis. 513 ; Hartranft's Appeal, 85 Pa. St. 433. Hence, in The State v. … The State ex rel. v. Cohen, 13 S. C. 201; Devall v. Taylor, 1 Cheaves, 5; The People ex rel. v. Board of Police, 6 Abb. Pr. 162 ; The People ex rel. v. Cholwell, 6 Abb. Pr. 151; Owens v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Plodzien v. Whaley

    610 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1980

    Louis Board of Police Commissioners (Board). The Board dismissed appellant Walter Plodzien from the St. … Edmonds, supra, 407-408 [5-8], Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-782 [2-6] (Mo. banc 1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • School District No. 46 v. Stewartsville School District

    232 Mo. App. 631 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1937

    As in State ex rel. v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374 , the real error, if error, asked to be corrected in the petition of Ivie to the County Court is in fact not an erroneous assessment, but in fact, is an erroneous taxation. … Under the authority of State ex rel. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tarrant v. Tarrant

    156 Mo. App. 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1911

    [Richards v. Richards, supra. Brown v. Brown, 38 Arkansas 324; McGill v. McGill, 19 Fla. 341 .] II. … [Gillinwaters v. Gillinwaters, supra; Neff v. Neff, supra.] III.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners

    714 S.W.2d 873 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1986

    See Barnes Hospital v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights, 661 S.W.2d 534 (Mo. banc 1983); St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights, supra; St. Louis County v. … Louis County Board of Election Commissioners v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights, 668 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.App.1984). . Ms. Houston did not intervene in this case.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Vinita Park Ex Rel. Board of Directors v. Girls Sheltercare, Inc.

    664 S.W.2d 256 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1984

    A similar ordinance was at issue in Group House of Port Washington, Inc. v. Board of Zoning and Appeals of Town of North Hempstead, 45 N.Y.2d 266 , 408 N.Y.S.2d 377 , 380 N.E.2d 207 (1978). … Louis Union Trust Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • The St. Louis Police Leadership Organization v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2015

    of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 15 v. … See Derrick, Inc. v. Quigless, 408 S.W.3d 323, 326 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). No reason exists why the City was not provided notice and an opportunity to defend, both here and in the circuit court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCrainey v. Kansas City Missouri School District

    337 S.W.3d 746 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2011

    See Brown v. Lanrich, Inc., 950 S.W.2d 235 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). … However, the court in Brown cited no authority supporting its decision, and furthermore, its decision contradicts older Missouri ease law that has not been overruled. See, e.g., Stith v. St Louis Pub. Serv.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Reorganized School District R-2 of Newton County v. Robinson

    276 S.W.2d 235 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1955

    Keitel v. Harris, 353 Mo. 1043 , 186 S.W.2d 31, 33 (2)], the reported opinions reflect frequent references to such board as “a judicial tribunal” [State ex rel. School Dist. No. 1 v. … to the clerks of the interested districts [Brown & Moore v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Bank of Houston v. Kirkman

    156 Mo. App. 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1911

    Brown and Alfred H. … deed of trust of Brown’s was paid and. cancelled without Brown having any knowledge of defendants’ contract with Cummings.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.